Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РОМАНОВ | CS2

Channel

РОМАНОВ | CS2

@romanovcs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

56,927subscribers

+7,905 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002528674499
TypeChannel
Username@romanovcs
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romanovcs

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

48,95156,92752,9397 August 2026 — 49,022 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,022 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,979 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,954 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,951 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,005 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,224 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,290 subscribers16 August 2026 — 49,333 subscribers17 August 2026 — 49,352 subscribers18 August 2026 — 49,340 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,333 subscribers20 August 2026 — 49,272 subscribers21 August 2026 — 49,256 subscribers23 August 2026 — 49,237 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,904 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,379 subscribers26 August 2026 — 52,170 subscribers27 August 2026 — 53,464 subscribers28 August 2026 — 53,155 subscribers29 August 2026 — 53,051 subscribers30 August 2026 — 52,945 subscribers31 August 2026 — 52,839 subscribers1 September 2026 — 52,643 subscribers2 September 2026 — 52,513 subscribers4 September 2026 — 52,388 subscribers6 September 2026 — 54,932 subscribers10 September 2026 — 56,927 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 33 days, net +7,905. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,755–58,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:3956,927+1,995
6 Sept 2026, 18:2054,932+2,544
4 Sept 2026, 07:3952,388-125
2 Sept 2026, 23:0552,513-130
1 Sept 2026, 20:4652,643-196
31 Aug 2026, 23:2952,839-106
30 Aug 2026, 22:0652,945-106
29 Aug 2026, 19:3653,051-104
28 Aug 2026, 21:2553,155-309
27 Aug 2026, 20:4553,464+1,294
26 Aug 2026, 17:3552,170+1,791
25 Aug 2026, 17:2450,379+475
24 Aug 2026, 19:3649,904+667
23 Aug 2026, 07:2349,237-19
21 Aug 2026, 20:1849,256-16
20 Aug 2026, 18:2249,272-61
19 Aug 2026, 15:4349,333-7
18 Aug 2026, 13:2449,340-12
17 Aug 2026, 12:3649,352+19
16 Aug 2026, 03:2849,333first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 56,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held25 (3 June 202624 August 2026)
Views total20,730
Reactions total520
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,465 reactions across 25 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,80464.4%
❤‍🔥6508.71%
🔥5407.23%
😭2783.72%
👍1872.51%
🥰1201.61%
🙏1151.54%
💘1081.45%
🤣540.723%
🤮510.683%
🤯460.616%
🖕450.603%
🆒430.576%
🍌410.549%
😁380.509%
🤩360.482%
🎉320.429%
😢320.429%
💊260.348%
💋260.348%
23 further kinds1932.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
235
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 25 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
39
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romanovcs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈6,530 views375 reactions3 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

✨ РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 12 ЛУЧШИХ НОЖЕЙ✨ 🔗 Условия: 〰️ Подписка на ROMANOV 🔠 Подписка на СТРИМЫ 〰️ Подписка на EXTRIM 〰️ Подписка на GIZMO 〰️ Подписка на HELLSTON 〰️Нажать кнопку "Участвовать" ниже ✅ 1 МЕСТО ★ Нож-бабочка | Легенды (Романов) ★ Штык-нож M9 | Кровавая паутина (Экстрим) ★ Керамбит | Ультрафиолет (Хеллстон) ★ Коготь | Зуб тигра (Гизмо) ✅ 2 МЕСТО ★ Штык-нож | Кровавая паутина (Романов)

297🥰36❤‍🔥27🍌7🔥5👍2😎1

17 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈14,200 views145 reactions8 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Ой занесло, ой занесло меня, занесло меняяяяяяяя https://youtu.be/XZMJbAShqoI https://youtu.be/XZMJbAShqoI https://youtu.be/XZMJbAShqoI В течении пары дней пару новостей будет интересных 🤫

108🫡17🐳11❤‍🔥7🌭2

10 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈19,400 views633 reactions18 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

✨РОЗЫГРЫШ НОЖА ✨ Условия : 1. Поставить лайк на новый ролик: https://youtu.be/zb3l5O_MEMs 2. Скинуть скрин под пост выше ИТОГИ ЧЕРЕЗ 48 ЧАСОВ Победители: @kurokavav

491🤣54👍35❤‍🔥12💊9😁8🐳6🔥6

10 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈17,100 views364 reactions39 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Я думаю пришло время поговорить чуть-чуть, устал уже в себе держать это. Я не знаю, замечал кто или нет, но последнее время меня очень сильно душит ютуб, даже по ласт ролику можно это увидеть, это очень сильно вгоняет в тильт, а помимо этого накладывается тильт от вечных проебов и двойной тильт уже приводит к какой-то апатии, а я не хочу делать контент на отъебись, для меня это табу, мы будем доводить ролик до идеа

282💘35👍29🖕12🔥6

10 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈12,500 views104 reactions4 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

ЛАЙКИ СОБРАЛИСЬ, МИЛЛИОН ЗАДЕПАН https://youtu.be/zb3l5O_MEMs https://youtu.be/zb3l5O_MEMs https://youtu.be/zb3l5O_MEMs

90🔥8❤‍🔥5💊1

31 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈18,400 views339 reactions6 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

✨РОЗЫГРЫШ НОЖА ✨ Условия : 1. Поставить лайк на новый ролик: https://youtu.be/qu8vLYhdr3E 2. Скинуть скрин под пост выше ИТОГИ ЧЕРЕЗ 3 ЧАСА! Победители: @kalina_22

❤‍🔥215🙏4838🖕11🤮8💔7🏆5💘3

31 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC≈16,000 views85 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

КЕЙС БАТЛ, КЕЙС БАТЛ... https://youtu.be/qu8vLYhdr3E https://youtu.be/qu8vLYhdr3E https://youtu.be/qu8vLYhdr3E Стоит дальше снимать? Могу след ролик на основе сделать

🙏5919😱4❤‍🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC≈21,900 views619 reactions29 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

✨РОЗЫГРЫШ 3 ПРОКАЧЕК ПО 20.000 ✨ Условия : 1. Поставить лайк на новый ролик: https://youtu.be/_umTqwCujw4 2. Скинуть скрин под пост выше ИТОГИ ЧЕРЕЗ 24 ЧАСОВ! Победители: @yaneMO666, @dreamkeeperc7, @BAPH4

485😭59❤‍🔥45💯10🔥8🏆6🆒5💘1

27 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC≈19,200 views114 reactions2 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

ПОШЛА ВОДА ГОРЯЧАЯ! https://youtu.be/_umTqwCujw4 https://youtu.be/_umTqwCujw4 https://youtu.be/_umTqwCujw4

❤‍🔥8518😱7🥰4

26 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC≈21,900 views184 reactions27 Starsread 25 August 2026
Video

🫀

146🔥18🤯16💘2🙏2

24 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC≈22,200 views311 reactions2 Starsread 25 August 2026
Video

СТООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООО 100 роликов на канале вот-вот случится, 100 ролик не может быть плохим, поэтому он БУДЕТ САМЫМ МАСШТАБНЫМ, ДОРОГИМ И ПРОСТО ЛУЧШИМ РОЛИКОМ 🤌 27.

259❤‍🔥26💋16💘7🔥1🖕1🤮1

20 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈27,000 views93 reactions6 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

ЭТО С 1000 РУБЛЕЙ, ЕЩЁ И НА ЛОУ ПРОЦЕНТЕ... https://youtu.be/qR2zqq88eCc https://youtu.be/qR2zqq88eCc https://youtu.be/qR2zqq88eCc Этот ролик только разминка, перед тем, что выйдет на днях... А за вчера обидно, почему то верил в Аргентину, ставил на нее, но будто бы понимал что Испания 10 из 10 выигрывает

82👍7🆒3🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @romanovcs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@romanovcs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РОМАНОВ | CS2” (@romanovcs), 56,927 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romanovcs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.