Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Roman Skrypin

Channel

Roman Skrypin

@romanskrypin

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,424subscribers

+268 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147510446
TypeChannel
Username@romanskrypin
Created7 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romanskrypin

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,11010,48610,2986 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,160 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,162 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,157 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,135 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,110 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,124 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,148 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,153 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,261 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,303 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,318 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,324 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,331 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,356 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,383 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,373 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,390 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,413 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,411 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,403 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,391 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,426 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,481 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,486 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,470 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,438 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,424 subscribers10,4246 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +268. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,054–10,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:1610,424-14
16 Sept 2026, 11:5710,438-32
13 Sept 2026, 00:5710,470-16
11 Sept 2026, 04:4010,486+5
8 Sept 2026, 08:0210,481+55
4 Sept 2026, 23:5610,426+35
3 Sept 2026, 10:2810,391-12
2 Sept 2026, 05:0810,403-8
1 Sept 2026, 03:0710,411-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:1410,413+23
29 Aug 2026, 23:0510,390+17
29 Aug 2026, 00:2410,373-10
27 Aug 2026, 22:0810,383+27
26 Aug 2026, 19:4710,356+25
25 Aug 2026, 16:3710,331+7
24 Aug 2026, 18:0710,324+6
23 Aug 2026, 02:5210,318+15
21 Aug 2026, 13:4710,303+42
20 Aug 2026, 10:0310,261+108
19 Aug 2026, 11:4410,153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,468 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁47432.3%
👍26618.1%
22815.5%
🔥16010.9%
🤣906.13%
❤‍🔥644.36%
🖕241.63%
😱241.63%
💯201.36%
👌191.29%
🤡161.09%
💩151.02%
🤮151.02%
😢130.886%
💔110.749%
🤔70.477%
🤗70.477%
🌚40.272%
👎40.272%
👏20.136%
4 further kinds50.341%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 09:53 UTC≈3,640 views104 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я, можливо, помиляюся. А я ніколи не помиляюся. А скажіть дєду шо він догори дригом тримає папірці. В цему випадку сміх не гріх.

🤣90🤔6🌚42🖕2

24 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC≈6,600 views98 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Я маю пояснити свою позицію. Вона проста, як не крути. А крутити й не треба. UMN та Skrypin.ua існує винятково за ваші донейти. Цей місяць - катастрофа. Ніколи, чуєте, ніколи, ми не просили ні про що. Це була якась непроголошена угода, що ви нас підтримуєте і це супер-пупер історія. Є пару варіантів. Або ви нас розлюбили. Або ми робимо відверту хуйню. З другим я не погоджуюся. А ще я вірію у вас й те що ми стягнемо ц

👍57😁15😢10🤗7🖕6🤝21

24 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC≈4,030 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁42🔥6🖕21👍1

20 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC≈4,570 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

І ще трошки про "Білого орла". Відверто за польський характер світогляд, зверхність.

😁27👍10💯71

20 Jun 2026, 18:43 UTC≈4,340 views123 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

І про "Білого орла"

😁91👌19👍6💯4👏2🤮1

19 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC≈3,300 views100 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥55😁315👍5🤡2❤‍🔥1🥴1

14 Jun 2026, 19:29 UTC≈4,340 views160 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

А це ілюстрація до етеру з Наталею Мосейчук, про моє здичавіння серед білих грибів і білочок

😁11625👍12🤮6🤡1

14 Jun 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,620 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @UMNuaPhoto

https://youtu.be/MwOBPT_Pnrw?si=LmYZEDdmqgrdPTzB

👍26🤮8🤡2😱2🖕1

8 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC≈3,920 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔥НЕ ПРОПУСТІТЬ!🔥 Друга частина SKRYPIN PODCAST зі стендапером Олегом Лузановим ВЖЕ ДОСТУПНА ДЛЯ СПОНСОРІВ КАНАЛУ SKRYPIN.UA! Поставити пам'ятник Ющенку? Хто НАСПРАВДІ почав українізацію медіапростору? Цифровізацію почав ПОРОШЕНКО? До чого саме причетний ЗЕЛЕНСЬКИЙ? Чи можливо довести ХАРАСМЕНТ? Дізнайтеся відповіді на ці питання і не тільки РАНІШЕ ЗА ІНШИХ! 👉 https://youtu.be/uJZdBuJ-_Bs👈 👉 https://youtu.be/uJZdB

15👍9🤡6

1 Jun 2026, 18:26 UTC≈3,800 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @UMNua

🔥НЕ ПРОПУСТІТЬ!🔥 SKRYPIN PODCAST із засновником Fire Point Денисом Штілерманом ВЖЕ ДОСТУПНИЙ ДЛЯ СПОНСОРІВ КАНАЛУ SKRYPIN.UA! Що спільного між українськими далекобійними дронами, балістичним щитом Європи та... островом Епштейна? Хто ЗЛИВАЄ ВІЙСЬКОВІ ТАЄМНИЦІ? Звідки у засновника компанії рОСІЙСЬКИЙ ПАСПОРТ? Про все це і не тільки дізнайтеся раніше за інших! https://youtu.be/BqJrTOS_qmI

🔥3311👍8❤‍🔥1👎1🤔1🤡1

31 May 2026, 14:59 UTC≈3,060 views124 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

69😱22👍13💩9🤡4👎3🖕2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romanskrypin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Roman Skrypin” (@romanskrypin), 10,424 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romanskrypin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.