Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Этот ваш Чернышев

Channel

Этот ваш Чернышев

@romchernyshev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

631subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001236902309
TypeChannel
Username@romchernyshev
Created21 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romchernyshev

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

604631617.56 August 2026 — 617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 617 subscribers19 August 2026 — 614 subscribers26 August 2026 — 611 subscribers2 September 2026 — 604 subscribers11 September 2026 — 631 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 600–635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 10:40631+27
2 Sept 2026, 13:14604-7
26 Aug 2026, 02:04611-3
19 Aug 2026, 10:18614-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:34617no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:50617first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

324 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17854.9%
👍6520.1%
💯4012.3%
257.72%
😱51.54%
🤝41.23%
👏30.926%
🤗20.617%
🔥10.309%
😢10.309%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 324 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дякую шо хоч так перенос зробили, а не трішки інакше

😁7

6 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC93 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Треба взять на озброєння. Лотоси правда в нас сейгод не вродили, але думаю можна замінити лопухом. Листям ревеня. Або виїденою половинкою кавуна.

😁9🤝4

3 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC133 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сказать чому це маніпуляція, розрахована на емоційних і тупих, як часто буває в УП? Тому що 12% збігів це ні про що, чесно кажучи. Навіть в ідеальній дисертації знайдеться кілька відсотків збігів. Бо система враховує будь-які банальні фрази. У нього ж, очевидно, щось юридичне по темі дисеру, а там ті 12 відсотків цілком можуть становити цитати із законів та іншого. "Зокрема, стаття 20 КПК встановлює, що…" і тд. Я

16👍9👏3😁2

3 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC125 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

До попереднього посту (чи поста): Неможна посилати нахуй діючого військового, або ж ветерана - що одне й те саме. Навіть я такого не роблю, коли попадається ветеран-порохобот, наприклад. Найбільш жорстке що я таким відповідав, якщо вони захищаючи сивочолого на мене матюкались в коментах, це "Не ганьбіть форму подібною лексикою, шановний". І то навіть цього писати не треба було - просто мовчки банити, якщо вже ту мач

👍171

3 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC117 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ніколов-Нідворов. І збоку бантік. І посередині гвоздік. І хто його роздіває, той сльози проліває)

😁10

2 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC145 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мої красунчики з "Оболоні" розпочали для себе новий сезон в УПЛ програвши на виїзді "Епіцентру". В мене є питання до призначення пенальті, з якого забивали перший гол, але коли підсумковий рахунок 0:3, то вже немає принципового значення. Перший тайм був рівний, і навіть моменти "Оболоні" були гострішими. Другий тайм повністю за "Епіцентром". До речі, щиро радію за Кам'янець-Подільский, бо цього сезону їхня команда б

👍9

1 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC171 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Жил-был активный реформатор Михаил. Он приложений нам немало напилил. Он всех нейронке обучал, врагам "старлинки" отключал, за это всё одни копейки получал. Но вдруг в июле его трошечки "того". Тады всю правду мы узнали про него. Что он в политику хотел, контракты делать не умел, и на амбициях конкретно обнаглел.

😁15👍84

1 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC161 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всіх вітаю з початком кінця літа. Хай день буде добрим, а ніч спокійною

😁9👍52😢1

31 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC221 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💥😒Бля, ну тільки заснув, чесно! От шо вони там не в курсі які в мене проблеми зі сном? Не завжди. Періодами. Якраз зараз період такий. Повчаса як заснув - і одразу вибухи. Я ж тепер очей не зліплю до ранку, йопрст. Можна якось совість мать? Як казав мій друг Йозеф Швейк: "Куди ж ви, ідіоти, стріляєте?! Тут же люди!".

💯15🤗2

31 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC182 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нарешті вирішений ізвєчний спор. Ну я в цій махії завжди був на боці яйця, якшо чесно.

😁12💯3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romchernyshev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Этот ваш Чернышев” (@romchernyshev), 631 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romchernyshev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.