Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ronnezkaa

Channel

ronnezkaa

@ronniwelll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003753790488
TypeChannel
Username@ronniwelll
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 19 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ronniwelll

Growth

9512310910 August 2026 — 95 subscribers10 August 2026 — 95 subscribers17 August 2026 — 98 subscribers25 August 2026 — 102 subscribers1 September 2026 — 103 subscribers11 September 2026 — 112 subscribers18 September 2026 — 123 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:17123+11
11 Sept 2026, 00:01112+9
1 Sept 2026, 20:56103+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:07102+4
17 Aug 2026, 18:2898+3
10 Aug 2026, 18:0095no change
10 Aug 2026, 17:4795first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6642.0%
custom 54742568890322209072817.8%
custom 54741400487419014551811.5%
💘148.92%
custom 531666326465283628895.73%
custom 531699339731404430995.73%
custom 531699734009402304185.10%
custom 531706153267522883053.18%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ronniwelll. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC65 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ураа ураа айко с днем рождения <3 #art #friend hehe

9💘2custom 54742568890322209072custom 54741400487419014551

4 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @trtrttkPhoto

tw suicide & partial nudity? feeling the reality that everybody leaves в комментариях файликом загружу

3 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC58 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @k1lmessPhoto

Я и моя няшность #арт #друзя #ос

custom 54742568890322209075

1 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC89 views12 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ха. #sketch показывать аксолли не буду, а то взорвется хххвххехехвххехе 🚬🚬

custom 53169973400940230418custom 53166632646528362882custom 54741400487419014552

1 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC91 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чеее дизайн аксолли? лилаксольни #sketch он реально страшный чувак

custom 547425688903222090711custom 53169933973140443092

31 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC87 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

коте

custom 54741400487419014559custom 53169933973140443091custom 53170615326752288301

31 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC80 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @k1lmessPhoto

котк #арт #glebbomj #майнфд

custom 54741400487419014556

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ronniwelll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ronnezkaa” (@ronniwelll), 123 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ronniwelll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.