Les gars : Golden Cross qui arrive sur BTC dans les prochains jours…. on décrypte tout ça ensemble comme d’hab en analyse DONNEZ UN MAX DE FORCE https://youtu.be/plTd4ibl6ik?si=5NAKo8rj8IwVCcrl
❤159🔥32👏15🗿1😁1

Channel
@roroivx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56,252subscribers
-256 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001666546345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roroivx |
| Description | Voici mon journal de bord, où je partage mon quotidien dans la crypto Pour me contacter @textroro Mon insta : instagram.com/roroelguapo/ Le média : Investx.fr 🔞🎓 mes services sont à but éducatif. Pas de conseil en investissement. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roroivx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 56,252 | -28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 56,280 | -32 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:12 | 56,312 | +32 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:06 | 56,280 | +27 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 56,253 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 56,250 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 56,255 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 56,247 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 56,253 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 56,252 | +53 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 56,199 | -19 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 56,218 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 56,240 | -48 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 56,288 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 56,299 | -18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 56,317 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 56,330 | -30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 56,360 | -27 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 56,387 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 56,401 | first reading |
155 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (29 July 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 655,483 |
| Reactions total | 39,199 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44,180 reactions across 155 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32,293 | 73.1% | |
| 🔥 | 5,364 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 2,975 | 6.73% | |
| 😁 | 1,266 | 2.87% | |
| 🤯 | 639 | 1.45% | |
| 😱 | 537 | 1.22% | |
| 🎉 | 402 | 0.91% | |
| 🤩 | 391 | 0.885% | |
| 🗿 | 196 | 0.444% | |
| 🥰 | 117 | 0.265% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 155 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roroivx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 155 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Les gars : Golden Cross qui arrive sur BTC dans les prochains jours…. on décrypte tout ça ensemble comme d’hab en analyse DONNEZ UN MAX DE FORCE https://youtu.be/plTd4ibl6ik?si=5NAKo8rj8IwVCcrl
❤159🔥32👏15🗿1😁1
Dès que j'ai un token liquide avec un fort potentiel je le partage dans le groupe Spot. J'évite volontairement de partager des tokens peu liquides parce que je sais qu'à la seconde où j'envoie le message, il y aura beaucoup d'achats d'un coup et on risquerait tous d'acheter à un prix qui n'est pas le bon. Comptez sur moi d'autres projets arrivent dans le groupe Spot d'ici peu 👀
❤359🔥44👏25🥰7🎉5
Aucune raison de panic sell tôt ou tard CZ nous fera du CZ et il aura sûrement son moment. Comme BNB ça arrive souvent tard dans un bullrun. Mais malheureusement ça ne sera sûrement pas le token fort de ce bullrun
❤208👏36🔥6
Donc concrètement. Si vous n'en avez pas je ne pense pas qu'il faut en racheter. Si vous en avez et que vous avez acheté entre 0,95 et 1,15 dollar, ce qui doit être le prix d'entrée de pas mal de monde ici, quand ça remonte vers ces niveaux c'est peut-être plus intéressant de se désexposer même avec une petite perte. Mieux vaut un token corrélé au marché qu'un token manipulé qui dort. Je ne dis pas qu'il faut tout ve…
❤201👏27😁6🔥4
Mais il y a moins d'ambition on en entend beaucoup moins parler et on doit être honnête et se dire que c’est quand même moins bien que Lighter. C'est pour ça que Lighter a explosé et pas lui. Plus de potentiel long terme surtout avec la Robinhood Chain derrière.
❤190🔥28👏9
Le projet reste bien soyons honnêtes. Le DEX est top, l'application est belle ils ont bien mis à jour. Côté tokenomics ils ont même fait du bon boulot : les unlocks mensuels ont été réduits de 97%, le cliff des tokens de la team a été repoussé à septembre 2027 et 99% des frais quotidiens de la plateforme rachètent du ASTER redistribué aux stakers. Sur le papier c'est propre.
❤197🔥26👏10
J'ai acheté LIT avec l'argent de mes Aster. lit est passé de 0.90 à 3$. Ensuite j'ai racheté le même nombre de tokens Aster qui n'avait absolument pas bougé, il avait même baissé.
❤195👏25🔥7
HYPE va très certainement passer les 100 dollars et Aster n'aura toujours pas bougé ou clairement très peu. La CFTC fait tout pour autoriser les perp DEX, ça aurait dû lui profiter. Mais il ne joue pas dans ce marché-là. Il n'est pas corrélé à cette narrative contrairement à LIT et HYPE.
❤200👏22🔥6
Les gars petit point sur Aster ça faisait longtemps. Vous avez vu que le token remonte un peu c'est pas trop tôt. J'en parle plus depuis un moment et depuis l'ouverture du groupe spot je ne vous l'ai jamais fait acheter, même sur les plus bas. La raison est simple : il fait partie de la CZ mafia et il bouge comme un stablecoin depuis des mois. Comme le BNB en fait. C'est bien parce que ça ne descend jamais ultra ba…
❤206👏27🔥7
Les gagnants des concours commentaires des 3 dernières vidéos 50$ par personne donc là je donne 750$💰 BITCOIN objectif 83 000$ mais je garde du CASH (voici pourquoi) Tim.mli008, JackLefèvres, simonhouart5358, AdrienLegaut, loucoudray1728 MON SCENARIO SUR BITCOIN D'ICI FIN D'ANNEE (préparez vous) Bouloxito_269, theflystorm2.035, Sliqer, steve-barberis, ethane_banient Si le Bitcoin passe sous ce prix, c'est terminé…
❤212👏54🔥22😁9🗿2
Je fais un point demain dessus, vous voulez ?
❤507🔥144😁4
Enfin il se réveille c’est pas trop tôt
❤343🔥64😁16🤩2🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @roroivx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roro Vevo - Journal Crypto” (@roroivx), 56,252 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roroivx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.