Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rose Gem Calls

Channel

Rose Gem Calls

@rosegemcalls

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,915subscribers

-215 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001920844730
TypeChannel
Username@rosegemcalls
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rosegemcalls

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,91510,13010,022.526 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,121 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,115 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,081 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,076 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,066 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,058 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,031 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,994 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,965 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,915 subscribers26 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 22 days, net -215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,883–10,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:169,915-50
13 Sept 2026, 05:179,965-29
9 Sept 2026, 09:429,994-37
6 Sept 2026, 00:1710,031-27
3 Sept 2026, 18:5610,058-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:1710,066-10
1 Sept 2026, 08:4910,076-5
31 Aug 2026, 09:5410,081-13
30 Aug 2026, 12:5710,094-14
29 Aug 2026, 13:4510,108-7
28 Aug 2026, 10:1810,115-6
27 Aug 2026, 08:2710,121-9
26 Aug 2026, 12:1510,130first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

661 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣47772.2%
😁7411.2%
👍385.75%
👏284.24%
263.93%
🤡101.51%
💔20.303%
🔥20.303%
😭20.303%
👎10.151%
🗿10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Feb 2025, 08:30 UTC≈5,800 views57 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

This is the greatest Valentine’s Day card I have ever seen! 😂😭

🤣379🤡6😁3👍2

12 Feb 2025, 16:28 UTC≈5,820 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Saka injured. Havertz injured. Jesus injured. Martinelli injured. Don’t worry Arsenal fans, this is where Sterling comes in❤️

🤣32👍3🔥1

11 Feb 2025, 13:20 UTC≈3,430 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Barcelona fans tonight

🤣30🤡43👍2

10 Feb 2025, 03:47 UTC≈3,300 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Liverpool fans: "We are going to win a quadruple this season." Plymouth:

🤣33😭21👍1

7 Feb 2025, 18:01 UTC≈4,010 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Van Dijk opening Twitter and seeing the tweet from Kanye🤣🤣

🤣15👍2😁2

4 Feb 2025, 14:43 UTC≈4,120 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨💣 Cristiano Ronaldo: “I had some really bad coaches”. “Some of them don't have a f*cking clue about football at all…”

🤣35👍4🗿1

3 Feb 2025, 05:45 UTC≈3,540 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Messi’s bodyguard finally lost 😭😭😭

🤣258👍6😁5🔥1

2 Feb 2025, 20:06 UTC≈3,180 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Gabriel wasn't leaving Haaland alone 😭

🤣30👍21

2 Feb 2025, 19:17 UTC≈3,180 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

It's crazy to me that Arsenal will finally finish above Man City in the Premier League table and still not win the title. 😭🤣

🤣40😁4👍1

1 Feb 2025, 11:57 UTC≈3,260 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Kylian Mbappé's worst year of his career vs. Raphinha's Ballon d'Or contender year 🤣🤣🤣

👏28🤣9😁4👍32

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rosegemcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lionel Messi Fans
@Lionel_Messi_10_Fans · 47,384
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rose Gem Calls” (@rosegemcalls), 9,915 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosegemcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.