Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Deul

Channel

Deul

@rottensalt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003142364897
TypeChannel
Username@rottensalt
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rottensalt

Growth

94121107.511 August 2026 — 96 subscribers11 August 2026 — 96 subscribers19 August 2026 — 95 subscribers26 August 2026 — 94 subscribers1 September 2026 — 121 subscribers11 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 20:28121+27
26 Aug 2026, 11:1394-1
19 Aug 2026, 08:4495-1
11 Aug 2026, 08:0196no change
11 Aug 2026, 07:4796first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

373 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓10829.0%
custom 54516170985077903184712.6%
custom 5285069648432227199318.31%
custom 5314447830327274596266.97%
🍌256.70%
🌭246.43%
custom 5307904726824693446225.90%
custom 5215190375907499040215.63%
custom 5285402104670739975184.83%
custom 5454012418948634907184.83%
😭82.14%
custom 521545150991909463371.88%
custom 528507070499418135041.07%
custom 540924093682579035341.07%
custom 545397212786042761930.804%
custom 545630194575504725230.804%
custom 520195774487724812110.268%
custom 524913116169060540010.268%
custom 544749507236492294910.268%
🎉10.268%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC56 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Just doing some shi

custom 52850696484322271998custom 54540124189486349076custom 54563019457550472523custom 54539721278604276192custom 52019577448772481211custom 52491311616906054001custom 54474950723649229491

1 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC87 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ой нет опять оно

custom 52854021046707399758custom 52154515099190946336custom 54092409368257903534custom 52850696484322271992custom 54540124189486349071

30 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC95 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ркбята кого рисовать подскажите у меня нет идей

custom 545401241894863490711custom 52850696484322271996custom 52850707049941813504custom 52854021046707399753🎉1custom 52154515099190946331custom 54539721278604276191

29 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC105 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

I don't like it скетч был лучше

custom 528506964843222719915custom 52854021046707399757🍌3🍓2🌭1

27 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC151 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Лабно вот лучше psina ❤️

🍓16custom 54516170985077903187🌭6🍌3

27 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC143 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Неизлечимо

🍓10custom 54516170985077903186🌭5🍌2

20 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC176 views37 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ларпить не забываем ребята

custom 545161709850779031816🌭8🍓8🍌4custom 53144478303272745961

16 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC180 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Да бля почему без надписи

custom 53144478303272745968custom 54516170985077903181

16 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC198 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 531444783032727459611🍓5custom 54516170985077903183

11 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC191 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кстати очень даже хуево

custom 545161709850779031814🍓8custom 53144478303272745966🌭1🍌1

8 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC216 views40 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓22🍌8custom 53079047268246934467custom 52151903759074990403

6 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC192 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😔😔

🍓12custom 52151903759074990407custom 53079047268246934465😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rottensalt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Deul” (@rottensalt), 121 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rottensalt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.