Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RoyaleXAU

Channel

RoyaleXAU

@royalexau

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

12,599subscribers

+8,865 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003004018400
TypeChannel
Username@royalexau
Description📊 Free Ea bot message @royaleceo for free bot 📈 79 ai bots majority vote bot Precision entries 🚀 Trade with data, not emotions 🌐 https://vigco.co/la-com-inv/QQwXS85l
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/royalexau

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

16,300 average views per post against 13,147 subscribers — an engagement rate of 124.2%. Across the 6,391 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.54% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.81%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured19 of 37 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled310,320
Mature posts only126.2% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,147 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,391 channels · p10 0.671% · p25 2.54% · p50 6.81% · p75 14.4% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort99.797th percentile · 18.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.223% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,30414,6948,9997 August 2026 — 3,734 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,726 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,676 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,667 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,617 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,608 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,561 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,545 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,523 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,500 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,442 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,382 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,352 subscribers27 September 2026 — 3,304 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,776 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,176 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,144 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,285 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,837 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,829 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,561 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,948 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,694 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,448 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,730 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,849 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,854 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,147 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,599 subscribers12,5997 August 20266 November 2026
29 measurements spanning 91 days, net +8,865. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,596–16,403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 06:4912,599-548
5 Nov 2026, 09:1613,147-707
4 Nov 2026, 11:1913,854+3,005
3 Nov 2026, 13:3710,849-881
2 Nov 2026, 10:0811,730-1,718
1 Nov 2026, 11:2113,448-1,246
31 Oct 2026, 12:5614,694+2,746
30 Oct 2026, 10:1011,948+4,387
27 Oct 2026, 02:277,561-268
24 Oct 2026, 11:347,829-8
21 Oct 2026, 14:047,837+1,552
18 Oct 2026, 17:156,285+141
15 Oct 2026, 07:166,144-32
12 Oct 2026, 16:046,176+400
5 Oct 2026, 16:545,776+2,472
27 Sept 2026, 17:213,304-48
15 Sept 2026, 14:183,352-30
12 Sept 2026, 05:013,382-60
7 Sept 2026, 12:373,442-58
2 Sept 2026, 22:073,500first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
128.1%
avg views ÷ 12,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,100
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
39
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held57 (6 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total338,860
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 07:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
316
Videos
67
Links
185

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 04:55 UTC≈15,000 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

V49 Completed Bot Version out now Free bot @royaleceo to get started

5 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC≈11,500 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://spreadcomparison.com/ We utilize Vantage Markets for trading gold, a brokerage known for its low spread fees, to obtain our complimentary trading bot. It is recommended to select this provider, as alternative brokers typically impose substantially higher fees.

5 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈16,000 viewsread 6 November 2026

Free bot How to get bot for free with the cheapest broker spread fees for trading referral sign up https://spreadcomparison.com/ Complimentary Free Full Licensed Automated Trading Free Bot Access Tutorial Access to the premium MQL5 Automated Trading Suite, which utilizes a 24/5 trading bot driven by 79 market analysis algorithms, is available at no cost. Procedure to Secure Complimentary Access: 1. New Vantage M…

4 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTCviews —

RoyaleXAU pinned «Free bot How to get bot for free with cheapest broker spread fees for trading referral sign up https://spreadcomparison.com/ Complimentary Free Full Licensed Automated Trading Free Bot Access Tutorial Access to the premium MQL5 Automated Trading Suite,…»

4 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTC≈13,300 viewsread 6 November 2026

Free bot How to get bot for free with cheapest broker spread fees for trading referral sign up https://spreadcomparison.com/ Complimentary Free Full Licensed Automated Trading Free Bot Access Tutorial Access to the premium MQL5 Automated Trading Suite, which utilizes a 24/5 trading bot driven by 79 market analysis algorithms, is available at no cost. Procedure to Secure Complimentary Access: 1. New Vantage Marke…

4 Nov 2026, 00:47 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 6 November 2026
File

Nice way to start the day 4 wins in a row so far

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @royalexau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RoyaleXAU” (@royalexau), 12,599 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royalexau.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.