Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Royal Samples 🎁 наборы косметики, которые любят

Channel

Royal Samples 🎁 наборы косметики, которые любят

@royalsamples

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,437subscribers

-235 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071797437
TypeChannel
Username@royalsamples
Description💝Упаковали и отправили более 1 000 000 косметических наборов 🛍Скидки до 80%, акции и конкурсы 🎁 Заказ наборов на сайте https://royalsamplesbox.ru по вопросам сотрудничества [email protected] https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b553231bca1d7fe172f0e4
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/royalsamples

Growth

11,43711,67211,554.56 August 2026 — 11,672 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,669 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,657 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,652 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,640 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,619 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,609 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,593 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,574 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,537 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,528 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,513 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,494 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,482 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,462 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,458 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,447 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,440 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,437 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,402–11,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:0511,437-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:2611,440-7
28 Aug 2026, 03:4511,447-11
27 Aug 2026, 02:0211,458-4
25 Aug 2026, 23:4211,462-20
24 Aug 2026, 21:2811,482-12
23 Aug 2026, 08:3911,494-19
21 Aug 2026, 19:2511,513-8
20 Aug 2026, 16:4311,521-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:0711,528-9
18 Aug 2026, 16:5711,537-6
17 Aug 2026, 15:5511,543-31
16 Aug 2026, 06:3711,574-19
14 Aug 2026, 16:3511,593-16
13 Aug 2026, 10:2511,609-10
12 Aug 2026, 13:2711,619-8
11 Aug 2026, 10:0311,627-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:5511,640-12
9 Aug 2026, 07:5411,652-5
8 Aug 2026, 04:3411,657first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.95%
avg views ÷ 11,437 subscribers
Avg views / post
566
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held39 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total21,524
Reactions total1,150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,150
Videos
790
Links
2,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 45s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,150 reactions across 38 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
67758.9%
🎉978.43%
👍958.26%
🥰917.91%
🤩786.78%
🔥574.96%
😁342.96%
👏211.83%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
752
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
548
over 37 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdWx81h14 August 20264 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC246 views25 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

🌧️ За окном дождь, а дома – новый набор от Royal Samples. И будто сразу стало теплее, тише и уютнее. Иногда для нужного настроения достаточно порадовать себя. 📱 RS в MAX #royal_samples #набор_косметики

15👍7🎉3

27 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC320 views18 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🤩4🎉2🥰2

27 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC347 views25 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

☀️ Солнце, ветер, кондиционеры и перепады температуры — коже каждый день есть с чем справляться. В новом обзоре собрали три средства Uriage для понятной рутины защиты и восстановления: ультралёгкий Bariésun SPF 50+ в travel-формате, Cica-Daily восстанавливающий гель-крем и Cica-Daily крем-концентрат со сменным блоком 💛 Минимум лишнего – максимум комфорта для кожи. Ссылка на статью vk.ru/@royalsamples-zaschita-i-vo

14👍8🎉3

27 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC345 views37 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Мы знаем точно, зачем Канье приезжает в Россию :) Это же очевидно!

😁248🤩5

26 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC404 views24 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

✨ Каждый день – маленький повод попробовать что-то новое и порадовать себя набором косметики. А ещё это прекрасный способ без лишних слов сказать близкому человеку: «Я тебя люблю» — красиво, заботливо и от души. 📱 RS в MAX: https://max.ru/royalsamples #royal_samples #набор_косметики

20🎉2🤩2

26 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC384 views24 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

💄 Матовые помады снова в игре В новом обзоре — помада Profashion Matte от PASTEL COSMETICS в оттенках 551 и 574 и жидкая помада Matte Chic Liquid от Faberlic ✨ Разбираемся, чем отличаются текстуры, какой оттенок выбрать на каждый день и как носить матовые губы легко, современно и без ощущения «слишком». Прочитать 👈🏻 #royal_samples #набор_косметики #статьявк

21🤩2🎉1

25 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC420 views32 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🫧 Жирный блеск, неровный рельеф и ощущение, что коже не хватает свежести? В новом обзоре – два средства для продуманной рутины: сыворотка против жирного блеска DE_CODE и энзимная пудра Malinka от The U. Рассказываем, как встроить их в уход и почему сегодня ставка — на деликатность, а не на агрессивное очищение. Ссылка на статью vk.ru/@royalsamples-chistaya-rabota-dva-buti-sredstva-dlya-kozhi-bez-lishnego-bl 👈🏻 📱 R

29🎉2👍1

25 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC422 views25 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

✨Иногда любимая уходовая рутина – это почти терапия. Тёплый душ, любимые баночки, маска – и ты будто возвращаешься к себе. Мысли становятся тише, настроение мягче, а всё сложное уже не кажется таким страшным. Маленькое напоминание: заботиться о себе можно просто потому, что тебе это нужно! 🙏🏻 📱 RS в MAX: https://max.ru/royalsamples #royal_samples #набор_косметики

17🥰6👍2

24 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC452 views25 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🧴 Когда хочется SPF 50+, ровный тон и минимум баночек на лице – смотрим в сторону тонирующего солнцезащитного флюида Avène SPF 50+: высокая защита, лёгкая текстура и эффект «моя кожа, только лучше». Рассказываем, что у него внутри и почему такой формат особенно удобен летом в нашей статье 📱 RS в MAX: https://max.ru/royalsamples #royal_samples #набор_косметики #статья_вк

👍157🤩3

24 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC445 views21 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Такие анпакинги мы любим!💞 Приятного просмотра, остались вопросы – пишите! 📱 RS в MAX: https://max.ru/royalsamples #royal_samples #набор_косметики

17👍2🤩2

24 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC493 views30 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

📦 Небольшое важное обновление по отправке заказов. Сейчас мы отправляем заказы 2 раза в неделю! Поэтому, если оформили заказ и он не отправился на следующий день – не переживайте: он уже ждёт ближайшей отправки ✨ Пожалуйста, учитывайте этот момент при оформлении, особенно если заказ нужен к определённой дате. Спасибо, что выбираете нас и ждёте свои посылки красоты! 🫰🏻

23🎉5🤩2

23 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC548 views27 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Кожа стала тусклой, рельеф неровный, а привычного ухода будто уже мало? 😕 В новой статье разбираемся, зачем коже гликолевая кислота, как работает Eden Glycolic Acid 7% и почему с кислотами правило «больше — лучше» точно не работает. Читайте и сохраняйте, если давно хотели подружиться с кислотным уходом ✨ Ссылка на статью 👈🏻 📱 RS в MAX: https://max.ru/royalsamples #royal_samples #набор_косметики #статья_вк

24👏2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @royalsamples. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 459,060 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Royal Samples 🎁 наборы косметики, которые любят” (@royalsamples), 11,437 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royalsamples.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.