Channel
قِصٌصٌ،دٌٍّْيٌٍِْآِْٰثٌٍْْٰةٌِْٓ،سٍْٓكٍْٓسٍْٓيٍْٓةٍْٰ،فِّيِّدِيِّوِهِآتّ،كٌٌٌُِٓحٍْٰاٌٌٍٰٰبٌٍْٰٰٓد،مصريه
@rq_zn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,069subscribers
+3,119 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002195007618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rq_zn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rq_zn |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 6,069 | -837 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 6,906 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 6,917 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:43 | 6,912 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 6,924 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 6,928 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 6,928 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 6,935 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 6,930 | +3,985 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,945 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 2,950 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@F8FFl · 1,241,390
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 15 August 2026
@F3BBF · 96,019
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قِصٌصٌ،دٌٍّْيٌٍِْآِْٰثٌٍْْٰةٌِْٓ،سٍْٓكٍْٓسٍْٓيٍْٓةٍْٰ،فِّيِّدِيِّوِهِآتّ،كٌٌٌُِٓحٍْٰاٌٌٍٰٰبٌٍْٰٰٓد،مصريه” (@rq_zn), 6,069 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rq_zn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.