Channel
@rrekl
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,742subscribers
-665 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001096999828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rrekl |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rrekl |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 27,742 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:00 | 27,751 | -19 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 27,770 | -13 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 27,783 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 27,800 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 27,807 | -31 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 27,838 | -26 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 27,864 | -62 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 27,926 | -73 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 27,999 | -89 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 28,088 | -92 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 28,180 | -28 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 28,208 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 28,230 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 28,240 | -41 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 28,281 | -21 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 28,302 | -34 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 28,336 | -34 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 28,370 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:13 | 28,387 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 13 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (13 January 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rrekl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 January 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مرحبًا يا صديقي ، إنه منتصف الليل وإن هذا الوقت صعب ، ولا أخفي عليك فإن الروح تائهة والوضع يزداد سوءًا ولا شغف يتحرك ولا ضوء يكسر العتمة ، والوحدة تحاصرني أينما كنت ، والحرب مستمرة بداخلي كنار لا تريد أن تنطفئ ، وإني أُكابر وأسرفت في التظاهر ، لكني لست بخير .
أعتقد أن قدرتي على تكوين العلاقات إنتهت نوعاً ما ، واستمراري في محادثة واحدة لمدة عشرة دقائق تعد معجزة .
ثم تعود فارغاً لست متاكداً من أي شيء لا تكترث لشيء لا ترغب بشيء لا تريد حتى التحدث ترخي يدك من كل شيء تهدأ تنطفئ تستلم ربما لا أدري ماذا يسمى هذا الشعور بالتحديد لا أدري إذا مازال هناك شعور حتى أم أن الفراغ وصل إلى الروح هذه المرة
مازلت أعاني من نوبات الحزن التي تأتي بلا سبب وبلا موعد ما زلت أعاني من تفكيري الزائد الذي يرُهقني مازلت أعاني من قلبي الذي يؤلمني دائماً مازلت أعاني من الوحدة المفرطة بالرغم من أن حولي الكثير ومازلت أتقن الصمت والكتمان على رغم الحرائق التي أشعر بها
ستعيش مرحلة من حياتك تكون فيها أكثر هدوءًا ، تتظاهر بعدم الفهم ، تتخطى مسألة العتب رغم وجاهته، لن تتصيد الهفوات، تتصالح مع ذاتك وتبتعد عن المقارنات والتقليد وتكون ذائقةً مستقلة ، ستكون هي مرحلة النضج العقلي ولا علاقة لها بالعمر بل بالتجارب
"أسوأ نومة ينامها الإنسان هي أول نومة ينامها بعد فقده لمن يحب، حينما يغمض عينيه بعد بكاء طويل تنتهي به طاقته، ثم يستيقظ وهو لا يعلم كيف نام ويظن أن كل شيء كان حلماً مخيفاً ثم يكتشف أنه لم يكن كذلك وأن الحلم في الواقع حقيقة."
الخامسة صباحاً ولم أنم بعد ! وأفكر باخترع جملة غير " صباح الخير " لأقولها أنا والصامدون أمثالي . نخبركم بها أننا شهدنا على الليل كله . وأننا أكرمنا تفاصيله وأننا ودعنا القمر حتى عتبة السماء واستقبلنا الشمس منذ أن بان ضلها أننا حرسنا الظلام والنور دون استراحه وشعرنا بهمسات أحلامكم الناعمه ليلاً وسمعنا ضجيج محاولاتكم في تحقيقها نهاراً ولم تفلت أذننا أنات المتألمين الملتحفين بسواد الليل ولا من أعيننا دموعهم اعتنينا بأكو…
التعمق بي مُتعب جداً ، فأنا لا أجيدُ التصنع ولا أجيدُ سوى إفلات من أراد الرحيل ، قلبي مليء بالغموض ويتلبسهُ الكبرياء .
ولكنني بعد كل تلك المحاولات خسرتك ومنذُ ذلك اليوم وأنا أعيش وكأني متأخر عن الحياة أضحك أحيانًا ولكن قلبي لا يشاركني وأتظاهر بأني بخير بينما داخلي يمتلئ بصوت الغياب كان يكفيني أن تبقي فقط لكنك رحلت وتركتني أواجهُ وحدي كل الأشياء التي كانت تُصبح سهلة بوجودك رحلتي وكلي أمل أن أرى طيفك من جديد .
ما زلت أصاب بنوبات حزن مفاجئة لأنني تذوقت الفراق أكثر من مرة ، غادرت صديقاً أو غادرني ، هجرت حبيباً أو تركني ، سرق الموت عزيزاً على غفلة أو راقبته يغادر حتى رحل ، كل الفقد مُر ، كل الفقد في قلبي لا يمر : أنا وللأسف تعيش العلاقات في صدري وقلبي حتى بعد انتهائها ، كل شخص رحل من حياتي أخذ برفقته جزءاً من روحي لا يعود مهما حاولت أو بكيت
كُنت أود إخبارك بأن الجميع قد خذلني إلا أنت .. ولكنك خذلتني قبل أن أخبرك .. ربما لم يكن شيئاً مهماً لك لكنهُ كان قلبي.
عزيزي . . ماذا يمكنني أن أقول لك ؟ الأمور لا تمضي على ما يرام أبداً أنني أكثر حزنًا وضجراً مما أستطيع أن أصفه لك ولم أعد أعرف في أي نقطة أنا .
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @rrekl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“: خذلانِ 々 .” (@rrekl), 27,742 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrekl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.