Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rrroeva

Channel

rrroeva

@rrroevart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

204subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002154289285
TypeChannel
Username@rrroevart
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrroevart

Growth

199204201.510 August 2026 — 202 subscribers10 August 2026 — 202 subscribers17 August 2026 — 201 subscribers25 August 2026 — 199 subscribers1 September 2026 — 204 subscribers10 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 15:23204+5
25 Aug 2026, 08:45199-2
17 Aug 2026, 15:58201-1
10 Aug 2026, 05:00202no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:47202first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

575 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21236.9%
custom 5290039767407274716478.17%
custom 5366256792458248239447.65%
custom 5283105267829997242386.61%
custom 5409106869421635391335.74%
❤‍🔥325.57%
custom 5292248402799644607284.87%
🍓284.87%
custom 5235564098736890654254.35%
💔254.35%
🔥203.48%
custom 5242485713412299371122.09%
custom 5382033126459454784111.91%
💯71.22%
custom 530077906254800312640.696%
🥴30.522%
custom 529431810029493501620.348%
custom 529449997068508592310.174%
custom 529643346617749516510.174%
💋10.174%
1 further kind10.174%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 575 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rrroevart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC70 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

обсуждают что-то джуси 👄

custom 528310526782999724216custom 52922484027996446075❤‍🔥4💋1🔥1custom 53007790625480031261

31 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC106 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

хоба решила заебаться над листом персонажа для нри по драгонлэнсу я вор природы потому что внезапно получила божественное благословение короче говоря игра заставила меня быть гринписовцем

14custom 52831052678299972425custom 52922484027996446074

16 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC154 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

она похожа на соню хромову

23💯7custom 53662567924582482394

4 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC184 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

этот рисунок вдохновлен тем как я ездила мыть голову к родителям и вычесывала потом свои колтуны на веранде пол часа 👀

🔥19custom 52355640987368906549custom 528310526782999724281

25 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC201 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026

друзья я закончила этот рисунок но забыла выложить и уехала в казахстан i'm sorry у нас с рисованием тревожно-избегающие отношения

23custom 52831052678299972423

10 Jun 2026, 08:16 UTC205 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

я люблю зелёный цвет🌳

26🍓8custom 52355640987368906548

29 May 2026, 09:31 UTC227 views36 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @rrroevaKPhoto

🌳🍧🌳

🍓20custom 523556409873689065465custom 53007790625480031263🤗1custom 52922484027996446071

29 May 2026, 09:31 UTC183 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

трогала траву, рисовала мост

custom 52355640987368906542

7 May 2026, 14:29 UTC260 views32 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

я рип чуваки никаких рисунков не нарисовалось меня все заебло 🥺 нашла скан скетчика для подруги внезапная небожижа да я шарю ахахах

custom 529003976740727471616custom 52424857134122993718custom 536625679245824823932custom 52943181002949350161custom 52944999706850859231custom 52964334661774951651

25 Apr 2026, 19:52 UTC220 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolossssserrorPhoto

Мы с подружками смотрели аватара седня😀

15❤‍🔥5custom 52922484027996446073custom 54091068694216353913

24 Apr 2026, 00:01 UTC235 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

я даже не фанатка аватара, но походу я теперь фанатка аватара хочу ещё нарисовать сокку..

22custom 540910686942163539110custom 52900397674072747167custom 52943181002949350161

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rrroevart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rrroeva” (@rrroevart), 204 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrroevart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.