Когда-нибудь тут будут не только репосты и я чета буду делать сам🤣🤣🤣
❤13custom 547422281705669016810💘4🎉1

Channel
@ruciwold
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
356subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001594735554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruciwold |
| Created | 4 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruciwold |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 356 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 352 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 350 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 349 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 347 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 348 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 348 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
314 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474222817056690168 | 114 | 36.3% | |
| ❤ | 103 | 32.8% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 10.5% | |
| 😭 | 16 | 5.10% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 4.14% | |
| custom 5971895289122920602 | 10 | 3.18% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 2.87% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 1.91% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 1.27% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.27% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.318% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.318% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ruciwold. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда-нибудь тут будут не только репосты и я чета буду делать сам🤣🤣🤣
❤13custom 547422281705669016810💘4🎉1
Подумалось мне, что можно неудачные дубли не удалять, а пилить доп контент в тгк 😁 Как вам идея? Деку дал зелёный свет 😡 А завтра принесу бэки с нового фотоса!
custom 547422281705669016812❤11💘3custom 59718952891229206021
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Фест прошёл так, что я не увидела ни одно выступление, конец 🙂 Но было очень весело! 🥳🥳🥳 💚 Деку ❤️ Ястреб 💛 Анастасия 💙 Официально, как на бэйдже, ЕКАТЕРИНА 💜 Шикарная Сева
custom 547422281705669016814❤5💋3💘1
Друзья!!! Купите мэрчик, пожалуйста, или я умру голодной смертью🤣 Подробнее можно узнать тут - https://t.me/munmun_ie Есть возможность передать на акамару (Москва) в это вс/пересыл Ещё можете заглянуть на моё авито - там не только костюмы и рассмотрю торг (там почти везде включен % авито)👉👈
❤14custom 54742228170566901686🥰4💘1
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 547422281705669016813❤8😍6custom 59718952891229206022🥰1
🌟Сегодня у Деку-Деку ДР и в честь этого на покекать…🌟 (есть еще более ранние варианты, но там совсем файлы смерти, ахаха. Были ещё разные версии, но…) Следующие коспики на Деку будут через 6 лет, чтобы укладываться в статистику.
❤15custom 547422281705669016811🔥9🥰2💋1custom 59718952891229206021
🎉Наступает время чистить галерею, поэтому попощу сюда всякого прошлогоднего…🎉 С теплотой вспоминаю этот фотос, несмотря на все сложности. И большое спасибо Наташе, которая подбила меня на Гинро и даже парик сделала, птмшт теперь считаю этого бро одним из своих самых удачных образов, хд. Бтв, можете заглянуть сюда и поставить луцк/посмотреть, какие мы красивые, хд
❤15custom 54742228170566901689🥰7🔥4
✨Я ухожу из косплея, но обязательств перед другими у меня ещё на два года, поэтому…✨ 🌟Вкидываю небольшой спойлер к следующей съемке🌟 Возможно, кто-то помнит удаленный закос год назад, так вот… И, если кому-то интересно, что происходит все это время: с конца прошлого года случилось сильное выгорание к коспику. С начала года у меня началась успешная карьера витубера (за 6 коротких стримов 150 сабов, йоу), рисоваки-ме…
custom 547422281705669016830😭16🥰14😱4custom 59718952891229206024👍1
⬆️Я сделал, кстати🫦 Подпишитесь/купите, пж… там ещё приколы будут!
❤10custom 54742228170566901685🥰3custom 59718952891229206021
💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 💥2,7 сантиметра ярости на блестящем акриле💥 Всего 💥💥💥💥 и ты станешь обладателем Великого Взрывоубийственного Бога Динамита🫦 💥Если хотите забрать микроба - он ждёт вас в лс сообщества💥 *итоговый цвет подвески золотой. Цена указана без учета доставки
❤12custom 54742228170566901684🥰2custom 59718952891229206021
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ruciwold. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ruciwold named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пельменный сомелье | Лорд Злыдень” (@ruciwold), 356 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruciwold.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.