Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 192–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:18
192
-1
10 Sept 2026, 15:19
193
-1
31 Aug 2026, 20:44
194
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:47
195
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:06
195
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
89.4%
👍
2
3.03%
🤬
2
3.03%
⚡
1
1.52%
👏
1
1.52%
🔥
1
1.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚢⚡️ 100.000€. 1.700 personas garantizamos autosuficiencia a la UCI pediátrica.
Hemos llegado a un hito que hace unas semanas parecía imposible. Gracias a vosotras y vosotros, la energía solar está más cerca del Hospital Pediátrico Juan Manuel Márquez.
Pero el Astral no para. Y la solidaridad tampoco.
Queremos llegar a los 125.000€ porque creemos que podemos ampliar el impacto de lo que llevamos a bordo. En los próx…
¡APOYA LA MISIÓN!
Cuba atraviesa la crisis más grave de su historia reciente. Sin luz.
Completamente bloqueados por Estados Unidos y sin petróleo.
Nosotros navegamos hasta allí. Tú decides si llegamos.
🎯 Meta: 100.000€
Cada euro cuenta. Cada donación importa. Estamos muy cerca.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DYjgYnYiAQ9/?igsh=OGQyaDhzbm91dHVv
Willy Toledo apoya la misión Rumbo a Cuba junto a @openarms_fund .
Vamos a llevar paneles solares al Hospital Pediátrico de La Habana.
Necesitamos el máximo apoyo económico para que el éxito de la misión sea total.
Súmate en rumboacuba.org
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYZL0MeoRnt/?igsh=ZWpjcHcyNWt2NW83
NOS NIEGAN PUERTO EN VALÈNCIA
Hoy teníamos que zarpar de Barcelona hacia València pero las entidades portuarias no nos han dado puerto. Es decir, no nos deja atracar en el puerto de València. Ahora mismo estamos buscando alternativas. Hacemos un llamamiento a la sociedad civil y a las organizaciones sociales —especialmente del País Valencià— para denunciar este impedimento a la solidaridad internacional.
No pararán…
🔆🤝 Acto de presentación: “Energía que cuida derechos” 🚢
En Ecooo, junto a *Open Arms* , lanzamos la campaña *“Energía que cuida derechos”* , que une energía y solidaridad internacional, en apoyo a la *Flotilla Rumbo a Cuba* para llevar paneles solares al *Hospital Infantil Juan Manuel Márquez en La Habana.*
Te invitamos al acto de presentación con:
👤 *Óscar Camps* , presidente de Open Arms.
👤 *Ayme Román* , a…
🌊🇨🇺 Cap a Cuba salpa de Barcelona!
Aquest cap de setmana 9 i 10 de maig, el veler Astral d'@openarms deixa el Moll de la Fusta rumb a l'Havana amb una missió humanitària tangible: portar panells fotovoltaics per garantir l'autosuficiència energètica de la unitat de cures intensives de l'Hospital Pediàtric Juan Manuel Márquez.
Una acció directa contra el bloqueig econòmic que ofega Cuba –endurit el gener de 2026 per…
🇨🇺 DEMÀ A VALÈNCIA
T'esperem este dimecres 29 en
Ca Revolta, ajuda'ns amb la teua solidaritat a trencar el bloqueig.
Cuba no està sola! ✊🏼
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rumboacuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rumboacuba named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@openarms_fund named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rumbo a Cuba” (@rumboacuba), 192 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rumboacuba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.