3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 10:20
132
+98
2 Sept 2026, 00:47
34
+15
1 Sept 2026, 18:15
19
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
84.1%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
20 (21 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
1,887
Reactions total
118
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
66
43.7%
🔥
60
39.7%
👍
18
11.9%
👏
3
1.99%
🫡
3
1.99%
❤🔥
1
0.662%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я вот иногда думаю: ведь чтобы заставить себя бежать 710 километров, должна быть очень веская причина.
Потому что просто ради спортивного результата я бы, наверное,не стал.
Можно поставить себе цель пробежать 100 километров. 200. Можно проверить себя,доказать себе, что ты можешь.
Но 710 !?
Мне кажется, на такой дистанции в какой-то момент спортивная мотивация закончится. И останется только ответ на вопрос:ради че…
До старта осталось совсем немного.
И сейчас у меня примерно такое ощущение, что вроде бы ещё не бежим, но уже всё вокруг про наш забег.
С утра — тренировка.
Потом работа.
Потом какие-то согласования, звонки, покупки, ещё что-нибудь.
Сейчас согласовываем точки старта и финиша.
Параллельно закупаем всякие мелочи для самого забега и машины сопровождения. Чем ближе старт, тем длиннее становится список того, что "об…
Когда мы только начинали организацию забега, мне казалось, что самое сложное — пробежать 710 километров.
Сейчас понимаю: сам бег - только часть задачи.
Первое - тренировки.
Таких объёмов я раньше не бегал. Одно дело - обычная тренировка. Совсем другое - когда тебе нужно за один день пробежать 60–70 километров.
Первые разы организм спрашивает: “А мы точно решили это делать?”
И тут я неожиданно для себя осознал, н…
RUN710 / Две столицы. Одна цель. pinned «Навигация по забегу “Две столицы - одна цель!” Всё самое важное в одном посте. 5 сентября мы стартуем с Дворцовой площади в Санкт-Петербурге и отправляемся в Москву. 710 километров за 10 дней. Мы бежим, чтобы собрать 1,5 млн рублей на протез для Руслана…»
Навигация по забегу “Две столицы - одна цель!”
Всё самое важное в одном посте.
5 сентября мы стартуем с Дворцовой площади в Санкт-Петербурге и отправляемся в Москву.
710 километров за 10 дней.
Мы бежим, чтобы собрать 1,5 млн рублей на протез для Руслана Авзалова и помочь ему вернуться к активной жизни и выйти на старт своего первого марафона.
Здесь собрали всё, что вам может понадобиться ⬇️⬇️⬇️
КОГДА И ГДЕ
📍 Ст…
Когда я понял, что для подготовки к 710 километрам мне нужен не просто тренер, а человек с реальным опытом сверхдлинных дистанций, я начал спрашивать совета у друзей-бегунов.
Первой позвонил Анастасии Шариповой — чемпионке России по суточному бегу. Мы давно знакомы, поэтому я полностью доверял её мнению.
И Настя сказала:
«Тебе нужен Ильдар. Никто не сможет помочь тебе лучше».
Так я позвонил Ильдару Камалетдинову.
М…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @run710. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RUN710 / Две столицы. Одна цель.” (@run710), 132 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/run710.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.