Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [🌑] Cookie Run Kingdom / OvenBreak / OvenSmash / Tower of Adventures / Witch Castle / Crumble

Channel

[🌑] Cookie Run Kingdom / OvenBreak / OvenSmash / Tower of Adventures / Witch Castle / Crumble

@run_cookie_run

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

28,434subscribers

-500 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437315566
TypeChannel
Username@run_cookie_run
Description🍪 Кукиран каналы: @cookiemap 🛁 Наш чат: @run_cookie 🍙 По каналу: t.me/cookiemap_direct?direct 🗳 По рекламе: @add_manager_tg Правила: https://telegra.ph/RCR-09-09-2 👉 Предложка: @run_cookie_run_bot Донат: donatov.net https://telega.in/c/run_cookie
Created9 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/run_cookie_run

Growth

28,43428,93428,6846 August 2026 — 28,934 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,920 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,889 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,869 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,855 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,833 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,802 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,798 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,793 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,754 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,734 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,715 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,685 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,668 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,631 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,603 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,584 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,559 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,568 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,543 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,509 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,458 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,434 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -500. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,359–29,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 00:5828,434-24
1 Sept 2026, 01:3628,458-34
30 Aug 2026, 21:5228,492-17
30 Aug 2026, 00:0528,509-15
29 Aug 2026, 02:2628,524-19
28 Aug 2026, 03:2328,543-25
26 Aug 2026, 23:5428,568+9
25 Aug 2026, 21:4728,559-25
24 Aug 2026, 18:5828,584-19
23 Aug 2026, 04:0328,603-28
21 Aug 2026, 12:4528,631-37
20 Aug 2026, 14:2328,668-17
19 Aug 2026, 12:2928,685-30
18 Aug 2026, 11:4328,715-19
17 Aug 2026, 12:4628,734-24
16 Aug 2026, 07:2428,758+4
14 Aug 2026, 18:3828,754-39
13 Aug 2026, 07:3628,793-5
12 Aug 2026, 10:1728,798-4
11 Aug 2026, 13:2328,802first reading

Engagement

165 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 28,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
164 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
165
of 165 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held165 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total586,361
Reactions total17,718
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,300
Videos
2,410
Links
4,940

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
33m 24s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,718 reactions across 164 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,22957.7%
🔥2,19212.4%
❤‍🔥7994.51%
💋6693.78%
🍓5993.38%
💔5132.90%
5102.88%
😭5082.87%
😱3171.79%
2771.56%
😨1630.92%
😐1480.835%
🤯1360.768%
🎉1140.643%
🌭1090.615%
🙏1060.598%
🥰910.514%
👍510.288%
😡490.277%
🤩380.214%
9 further kinds1000.564%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 164 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 164 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @run_cookie_run. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 165 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.606%
1 of 165 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,430
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,620
over 163 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJxKop5111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC811 views62 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🍪🍪🍪 Предложка | Донат Автор | #ТикТок@run_cookie_run

50❤‍🔥5🎉3🍓1💋1😡1🙏1

1 Sept 2026, 20:19 UTC≈2,220 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Braverse | Друзья из Платтер Сити пришли поиграть!🍹 Сейчас Сентябрь, но неужели всё ещё ТАК жарко?!🥵 Спаситесь от жары и ПРОЛОЖИТЕ себе путь через #CookieRunTCG с самыми крутыми Печеньками из Платтер Сити! 🔥 💥 Промо-набор Кубка Короны Печи №12 📅Запуск 12 октября Предложка | Донат #Новости@run_cookie_run

🔥3411❤‍🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 20:07 UTC≈2,300 views127 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Kingdom | «Мистер. Когда я за рулём, тормоза не нужны». 🏎️💨 #PulpoCookie — это сплошной газ, постоянно! 🐙 Донат | Предложка #Арты@run_cookie_run

80🥰2814🍓2🔥2💋1

1 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC≈2,180 views96 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#OvenSmash | ПОВ: Настолько милый миротворец, что забываешь о самом Кубке Короны Печи. 👼 Предложка | Донат #Арты@run_cookie_run

84💋7🍓5

1 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈5,200 views122 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Crumble | Cookie Run: Crumble заработал 11млн$+ заняв 15 место в топе игр, переплюнув намного Cookie Run: Kingdom. Что это, уходит эпоха кингдома? Тот же Classic за первый свой месяц заработал 5млн$+ что также в два и более раза больше кингдома. Интересный поворот событий. Сообщество по крамблу: t.me/crun_crumble Видео взято у: cookiecervo (x) Предложка | Донат Автор | #Разное@run_cookie_run

🎉7718🤯17😱62🔥1😭1

1 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,210 views173 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🍪🍪🍪🍪 Предложка | Донат Автор | #ТикТок@run_cookie_run

12631🍓8❤‍🔥61🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈3,570 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#OvenBreak | Возвращение в Деревню Якгва: Жуткие истории – Глава 1 🗡️👻 В деревне Якгва начинается еще одна жуткая история! 💥 Примите участие в событии прямо сейчас, чтобы разобраться в странных явлениях! 🙌✨ Предложка | Донат #Новости@run_cookie_run

💋4813🔥51🍓1

31 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,470 views189 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Kingdom | «При правильном использовании три на самом деле стабильнее, чем два». 🖤❤️💛 Фанарт от: @GiraffeNecc Донат | Предложка #Арты@run_cookie_run

💋12347❤‍🔥13🍓31👍1🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈3,250 views56 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Classic | 🏆Эпизод Испытание Печенья🍪 Бегайте с Печеньем, которое выпало в каждом Эпизоде! ✨ Выполняйте задания, чтобы получить сладкие награды! 🎁 Бегите~ Бегите~!! 🏃‍♀️💨 Предложка | Донат #Разное@run_cookie_run

💋41🔥9🍓411

31 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,710 views172 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🌍🍪 Предложка | Донат Автор | #ТикТок@run_cookie_run

144💋16🍓921

30 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈4,190 views66 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Classic | Только в течение ограниченного времени! Доступно только во время Чхусока 🍁 🦊Кумихо Куки 🔮Фокс бид ☁️ Винди 🍃 Ребел куки Получите специальные костюмы в честь Чхусока для Кумихо Куки и Куки-Повстанца в магазине! ✨ (⚠️ Фокс бид и Винди нельзя вывести через инкубатор питомцев) Вперед, побежали~ побежали~!! 🏃‍♀️💨 Предложка | Донат #Разное@run_cookie_run

57🔥53❤‍🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈4,310 views253 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Kingdom | Не уходи никуда, беги со мной до конца своей жизни. Клин: #Трасттк Предложка | Донат #Разное@run_cookie_run

🔥157😭6624❤‍🔥31💔1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @run_cookie_run. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@run_cookie_run edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,879 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[🌑] Cookie Run Kingdom / OvenBreak / OvenSmash / Tower of Adventures / Witch Castle / Crumble” (@run_cookie_run), 28,434 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/run_cookie_run.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.