Channel
@rusradfem2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,864subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001375978485 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rusradfem2 |
| Created | 9 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rusradfem2 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 1,864 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 1,861 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 1,850 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 1,855 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,854 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 1,857 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 1,854 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,858 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 1,859 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 1,864 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 1,863 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 1,865 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,865 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
202 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 54 | 26.7% | |
| 🤣 | 49 | 24.3% | |
| ✍ | 27 | 13.4% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 12.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 8.42% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 4.95% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#радфем_vs_патриархат Анон трансы это фетиш потому что эээм на всех артах тпарни небольшого роста и вообще я лучше знаю что ты за экраном девочка которая про трансов только в твиттере слышала Адм.: Минимальное отличие рандомного подростка — мамкиного квирфоба-нетолерашки — от терф. Они всё меньше различаются между собой.
🐳10😁1
#rusradfem_филиал_подписчика Анон-1 В очередной раз хочется поднять тему того, насколько же блять упорно вестоиды игнорируют очевидный факт, что самая токсичная часть трансфобии возникает именно из ненависти к мужчинам и маскулинности. Далеко не факт однако, что самая значимая с точки зрения материального вреда (но определенно больше чем нихуя), и можно в принципе дохуя спорить о том, насколько стоит её учитывать п…
❤9⚡2✍1
#rusradfem_вам_показалось От старшего админа. В Питере есть такой писатель Дмитрий Григорьев, бывший хиппи, с которым у меня много общих знакомых, и кое-кто из них подтвердил: история с лесбиянкой из автобиографической книги Григорьева "Господин ветер" не выдумана. Книга вышла в начале 2000-х, а речь там идёт о 90-х. В одном из эпизодов герой-автостопщик останавливается у приятелей-неформалов, они отдыхают, но внеза…
❤8😢3
#rusradfem_вам_показалось Анон На холиварке аноны пытаются доказать радфемкам, что женский остров не равно полная безопасность и вечное сияние чистого разума: "Просто, вот, представим, условная Модина [ранее известная в ролевых и квир-кругах мошенница, сидит в колонии, кинула на деньги много женщин — адм.], которая в курсе тусы и тусовочных заморочек, включая феминизм, вместе с несколькими своими подружками из коло…
🌚12❤2
#rusradfem_терфокун Про Песата. Анон-1 Песацкий — какой-то рисовальщик бары, то есть гей-картинок для мужчин. Писал, как его угнетают трансы, которые домогаются цис-геев. Но это точно не яойщица под мужскими местоимениями? А то вспомнил, как в ПМГ набегала терфка под видом гея, которому не нравятся транс-мужчины... Анон-2 Он странные вещи пишет. https://x.com/andrey_pesatsky/status/1975317226954867067 Никто не н…
🌚23
#rusradfem_терфокун Анон Некий терфокун Андрей Песацкий (Песат) написал трансфобный твит, ну и, конечно, там радфемки набежали в поддержку. Мужикам "как бы" не место в радфеме, но... есть много "но". — Прислано через @Radfem_bot
🌚19
#rusradfem_их_борьба Анон Бедняжки, у них своего флага нет. Адм.: Ого, борщ с зеленью. — Прислано через @Radfem_bot
🤣49🥱2
#радфем_vs_патриархат Прислал анон. Терфки форсят Стоунтосса — правого гомофоба, как обычно. — И моё последнее желание — стать женщиной. — Ладно. — Ничего не произошло?! — Поправочка! Транс-женщины — это женщины! — Прислано через @Radfem_bot
✍26😁6🤡3👍2
#rusradfem_пятиминутка_знаний #забугорщина Анон Джилл Фостер - Рофлинг на минималках. Ещё одна ебанашка светит своей тупостью (при этом проецируя её на других, конечно же), лезет в чужие трусы без спроса, репостит фейки и таких же, как она, и по классике - откровенно лжёт. Последний случай с "Мисс Звёздочкой" действительно имел место быть, но её уволили из-за игнорирования протокола безопасности (отдала ребенка взр…
❤🔥17❤7
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rusradfem2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русский радфем - Бессмысленный и Беспощадный” (@rusradfem2), 1,864 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusradfem2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.