29 measurements spanning 33 days, net -119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,301–32,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 08:17
32,360
+21
5 Sept 2026, 02:16
32,339
-7
3 Sept 2026, 05:58
32,346
-3
2 Sept 2026, 01:48
32,349
+21
1 Sept 2026, 03:19
32,328
+4
31 Aug 2026, 02:44
32,324
-23
29 Aug 2026, 23:33
32,347
-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:05
32,354
+28
27 Aug 2026, 19:25
32,326
-22
25 Aug 2026, 19:13
32,348
-22
24 Aug 2026, 16:08
32,370
-23
22 Aug 2026, 20:46
32,393
+13
21 Aug 2026, 11:25
32,380
+16
20 Aug 2026, 14:08
32,364
+3
19 Aug 2026, 17:06
32,361
-8
18 Aug 2026, 13:53
32,369
-15
17 Aug 2026, 10:17
32,384
-15
15 Aug 2026, 19:56
32,399
-9
14 Aug 2026, 07:04
32,408
-21
12 Aug 2026, 22:14
32,429
first reading
Engagement
195 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.36%
avg views ÷ 32,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,030
167 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.638%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
167
of 195 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 163 of 167 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
195 (5 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
505,832
Reactions total
3,171
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 01:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,400
Videos
≈2,730
Links
≈3,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24m 19s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,806 reactions across 185 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,381
36.3%
custom 5424776099823363879
1,228
32.3%
👍
298
7.83%
❤🔥
248
6.52%
🔥
225
5.91%
💘
60
1.58%
😢
46
1.21%
🏆
45
1.18%
🙏
35
0.92%
💯
32
0.841%
😍
26
0.683%
🤩
25
0.657%
👏
22
0.578%
👌
21
0.552%
😁
16
0.42%
⚡
14
0.368%
👎
11
0.289%
🤔
9
0.236%
😨
7
0.184%
🥰
7
0.184%
15 further kinds
50
1.31%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 191 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,838 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 195 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russian_sambo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 195 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 РОЗЫГРЫШ ЭКИПИРОВКИ ДЛЯ САМБО ОТ ESKHATA СОВМЕСТНО С ВСЕРОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИЕЙ САМБО
🎁Дарим: Куртку для самбо ESKHATA+ шорты для самбо ESKHATA
Условия простые:
✅ Подпишись на 👉 https://t.me/eskhatasport
✅ Быть подписчиком 👉 https://t.me/russian_sambo
✅ Нажми кнопку «УЧАСТВУЮ»
📅 Розыгрыш проходит с 8 по 14 сентября.
🏆 Итоги подведём 15 сентября.
Победителя определим среди участников, выполнивших условия розыг…
🔴 ПРАВИЛА САМБО 🔴
⌚ Судьям запрещено использовать часы, браслеты и любые предметы на поясе во время работы на ковре. Это также связано с требованиями безопасности.
Подари свой голос САМБО ⭐️ ВФС
MAX | ВК
🇷🇺 Россия начинает международный сезон
12-13 сентября в Бразилии пройдёт Чемпионат мира по пляжному самбо.
На турнир выйдет сборная России. Наши спортсмены будут выступать под российским флагом и гимном.
В первый день, 12 сентября, борьба пройдёт в восьми весовых категориях:
Мужчины: 58 кг, 71 кг, 88 кг, 88+ кг
Женщины: 50 кг, 59 кг, 72 кг, 72+ кг.
13 сентября состоится командный турнир.
12-13 сентября | Бразилия…
🥋 9 побед из 10! Российские самбисты триумфально выступили на турнире «Дух Кочевника» в Чите!
6️⃣ сентября в Чите состоялся международный турнир Лиги боевого самбо «Дух Кочевника». На арене сошлись сильнейшие бойцы из России, Китая, Казахстана и Бразилии!
🔥Наши спортсмены продемонстрировали высочайшее мастерство, одержав9️⃣ побед:
🥇Дмитрий Никитин
🥇Алеся Медведева
🥇Полина Александров
🥇Магомед Магомедов
🥇Магомед Гас…
🏵️ Самбо в ГТО | Почему техника важнее силы?
В самбо принято говорить: хорошая техника всегда побеждает грубую силу.
Это правило особенно заметно во время выполнения нормативов ГТО.
Даже физически подготовленный человек может получить незачет, если выполняет элемент неправильно. Поэтому на тренировках внимание уделяется каждой детали движения.
🥋 Осваивайте технику постепенно – и результат обязательно придет.
По…
Время самбо на нашем канале 💪
Лига боевого самбо на ваших экранах 🥋👊
Трансляция на Матч! Боец 📺
Матч! Боец в телеграм | МАХ
custom 54247760998233638799❤8🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @russian_sambo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@russian_sambo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 22 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⭐️ На турнире спортсмен может выиграть несколько встреч подряд. Что обязательно остаётся неизменным?
Весовая категория81%
Соперник3%
Страна соперника9%
Цвет формы7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Федерация САМБО Свердловской области @sambo_so · 3,711#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Федерация Дзюдо России @rus_judo · 40,709 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Всероссийская федерация самбо(ru.wikipedia.org) “…[https://vk.com/sambo_federation Официальное сообщество ВКонтакте]
* [https://t.me/russian_sambo Официальный канал в Телеграме]
{{rq|
{{значимость|дата=2013-01-23}}…” read 23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Всероссийская Федерация Самбо” (@russian_sambo), 32,360 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_sambo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
