Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Русская радиология - Цориев Андрей Эльдарович

Channel

Русская радиология - Цориев Андрей Эльдарович

@russrad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,178subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199929949
TypeChannel
Username@russrad
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/russrad

Growth

12,13812,18212,1607 August 2026 — 12,138 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,138 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,144 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,147 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,149 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,156 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,157 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,161 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,163 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,160 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,166 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,167 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,168 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,167 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,168 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,169 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,171 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,174 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,182 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,178 subscribers12,1787 August 20267 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 31 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,131–12,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 00:3612,178-4
4 Sept 2026, 12:4112,182+8
3 Sept 2026, 00:4812,174+3
1 Sept 2026, 22:0312,171+2
31 Aug 2026, 20:0812,169+1
30 Aug 2026, 21:5912,168+1
30 Aug 2026, 01:0412,167-1
29 Aug 2026, 03:3412,168+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:2712,167+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:5212,166+6
25 Aug 2026, 05:3712,160-3
24 Aug 2026, 04:1312,163+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:0712,161+4
20 Aug 2026, 23:1612,157-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:0412,160+3
14 Aug 2026, 04:0812,157+1
12 Aug 2026, 21:0312,156+1
11 Aug 2026, 22:2212,155+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:3512,154+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:3512,149first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 12,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,830
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.912%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held44 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total51,123
Reactions total422
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 22s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

685 reactions across 36 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏61289.3%
🤪7310.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 44 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russrad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC540 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Нужны ли онлайн-разборы сложных клинических случаев/вебинары и сколько могут стоить вебинары длительностью 1/2/3 часа? Отвечайте в комментариях.

👏17

2 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC647 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Помощь автору На кефир, ноотропил и блемарен

Signed Tribute

2 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC780 views10 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Спонтанное протяжённое субдуральное кровоизлияние у пациента с гранулёматозом с полиангиитом (ранее - гранулематоз Вегенера), в литературе описано 3 таких случая, всего ТРИ! И вот, Вашему вниманию предлагается четвёртый. Venning et al.15 предположили, что у некоторых пациентов с субарахноидальным кровоизлиянием и отрицательными результатами ангиографии причиной может быть скрытый васкулит центральной нервной системы

👏10

2 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC816 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Женщина, 74 года. В анамнезе карцинома яичника Т1аН0М0, 7 лет назад – лапаротомия, удаление правого яичника, Потом через 2 месяца – релапаротомия, овариэктомия справа, оментумэктомия, рецидив в малом тазу, гидронефроз справа, 5 месяцев назад – комбинированное удаление рецидивных опухолей малого таза, 2 курса ПХТ. Межпетлевой абсцесс в правой подвздошной области, который большое искушение принять за метастаз, но, во-п

👏5

31 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,410 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вот жил спокойно, невролог назначил МРТ. Сейчас будет на контроль ходить и волноваться. Мужчина 77 лет. Менингиома — самая частая случайная находка на МРТ (до 35–40% всех инциденталом). Встречается у 0,9–3,7% людей, у женщин после 65 — до 4–5%. >95% — доброкачественные, растут медленно (0–2 мм/год). Лечение требуется лишь в 1–3% случаев. В 80–90% достаточно наблюдения с МРТ-контролем. Решение о лечении зависит от

👏20

29 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,630 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Наблюдения заставляют думать, что чем более богата и сложна личная культура человека, тем менее гибко его поведение, тем меньше оно зависит от внешних обстоятельств. Человек со сложной личной культурой, если можно так выразиться, носит всю свою цивилизацию с полицией, штрафами, поощрениями и осуждениями в себе; человек же с культурой простенькой и фрагментарной легко принимает ту форму, которую ему предлагают обстоят

👏12

29 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,550 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЯ • Если поражению в периферической зоне (ПЗ) на основании данных диффузионно-взвешенного изображения (ДВИ) присвоена категория 3, выполняется дополнительная оценка этого же очага с помощью динамического контрастного усиления (ДКУ), при которой поражение с выраженным ранним и очаговым накоплением контрастного вещества повышается в итоговой оценке до PI-RADS 4. • После того как поражению на основании

👏12🤪1

29 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,490 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Женщина, 74 года, жалобы на неконкретизированные боли в животе. Люблю, когда по одной картинке классно все понятно (при этом я не утверждаю, что именно то, что видно и понятно, болит, речь идёт о точке зрения рентгенолога). В головке поджелудочной железы - расширены притоки вирсунгова протока, а тело и хвост дренируются отдельно, санториниевым протоком, который впадает в малый дуоденальный сосок отдельно от холедоха

👏18

27 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,660 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мужчинга 73 года, головокружение, в анамнезе инсульт от 19.01.26 (МРТ от 11.02.2026). Имеется неправильно-шаровидной формы геморрагическое внутримозговое скопление преимущественно с метгемоглобином (на Т1 и Т2, в основном, яркое, с тонкой, чёрной на всех последовательностях капсулой. Но по нижнему контуру какие-то неровные бахромчатые включения, при субтракции статически достоверное повышение сигнала на постконтрас

👏24

26 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Помощь автору На кефир, ноотропил и блемарен

🤪2

Signed Tribute

25 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,780 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Когда пытаетесь понять, есть в холедохе камень или нет, обязательно получите его изображение минимум на двух последовательностях в разных плоскостях, иначе сомнение не развеять. Вот, смотрите, 3Д - непонятно, кино-2Д - непонятно, аксиал TrueFISP - непонятно, фронтал HASTE - уже, вроде, убедительнее, но все равно, вдруг pseudocalculus sign? Но на HASTE сагиттале и аксиале сомнения развеваются, сто процентов камень ес

👏22

25 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,720 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Слово «экономика», например, таит в себе кое-какую правду жизни. Буквальный его перевод с древнегреческого звучит примерно как «Домострой» или «Правила домохозяйства». Помимо того, что это название отсылает нас к корням и истокам обозначаемого явления, оно может ещё и нанести болезненный пендаль многим т.н. экономистам, включая культовых: от специалистов по экономике этимология как бы велит ожидать практического умен

👏4🤪2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @russrad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTCAnonymous Poll545 voters

Все ли делают Т2*/SWI?

  1. Делаем всем68%
  2. Делаем не всем29%
  3. Не делаем: время/деньги экономим4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Poll233 voters

Актуальны будут наши курсы без выдачи документов?

  1. Да, нафиг документы77%
  2. Не, без документов стремно.24%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTCAnonymous Poll588 voters

В валике мозолистого тела слева у мужчины 49 лет

  1. Глиома с некрозом7%
  2. Кистозно-глиозные изменения после инфаркта63%
  3. Исход ДАП11%
  4. Периваскулярные пространства24%
  5. Ранний инфаркт1%
  6. Метастаз1%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Епифанов | Невролог| Все о позвоночнике
@epifanovnews · 49,058
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Медицинская Литература
@clinirec · 33,846
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 143,138
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русская радиология - Цориев Андрей Эльдарович” (@russrad), 12,178 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russrad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.