Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 39 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,019–12,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 04:18
12,064
-8
11 Sept 2026, 13:37
12,072
+3
5 Sept 2026, 16:42
12,069
+37
3 Sept 2026, 17:01
12,032
+6
2 Sept 2026, 10:05
12,026
-3
1 Sept 2026, 09:15
12,029
-6
31 Aug 2026, 09:25
12,035
-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:45
12,036
-4
29 Aug 2026, 07:43
12,040
-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:05
12,044
-1
26 Aug 2026, 08:43
12,045
-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:12
12,047
-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:08
12,049
-4
21 Aug 2026, 06:03
12,053
+1
19 Aug 2026, 10:13
12,052
+9
18 Aug 2026, 11:27
12,043
+4
17 Aug 2026, 14:17
12,039
+2
16 Aug 2026, 08:13
12,037
-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:28
12,038
-9
13 Aug 2026, 17:35
12,047
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 12,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,000
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.879%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
39 (19 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
76,070
Reactions total
613
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 02s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,557 reactions across 36 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
699
44.9%
❤
227
14.6%
😱
170
10.9%
👍
102
6.55%
😢
70
4.50%
🤬
67
4.30%
👎
46
2.95%
😨
31
1.99%
🔥
25
1.61%
😡
24
1.54%
❤🔥
20
1.28%
👀
20
1.28%
🤔
15
0.963%
🤯
15
0.963%
😐
6
0.385%
😭
5
0.321%
💔
4
0.257%
👏
3
0.193%
😁
3
0.193%
💋
2
0.128%
2 further kinds
3
0.193%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,557 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
12.8%
5 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
5
posts carrying an erid · 5 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,540
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,600
over 34 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvEQogE
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2VtzqwNmmDC
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
2VtzqwRt1Co
1
17 August 2026
17 August 2026
2VtzqwVKzGj
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
2VtzqxDovU3
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🍽 До 10 сентября в мебельной фабрике "Мастерская Кухонь"
скидки до 60% на все кухни на заказ!
Получите бесплатный дизайн-проект и рассчитайте стоимость с максимальной скидкой по ссылке👈
⚡️ Цены от 60 000 за целую кухню
⚡️ Собственное производство
⚡️ Рассрочка 0%
🎁 Посудомоечная машина в подарок!
Подпишитесь на их каналы, чтобы не потерять:
👉 Макс
👉 Телеграмм
Реклама: ООО "Мебельная Компания", ИНН 9725165084 erid:…
#нам пишут
Пропала кошка, Ксюша. В деревне Паново, Рузского округа.
Кошка белого окраса, местами серого "напыления" в особенности на мородочке, ушах и кончике хвоста. Глаза небесно голубые, в "кучу". На шее ошейник выцветающего оранжевого цвета с черной полоской. Характер добрый, но может не даваться в руки, не отзывается на кличку, а так же не идти на еду. Общительная.
Ушла 31.08 с участка в 11 утра и пропала, поиск…
#Нам пишут
Найден кот, возле деревни Артюхино.
Кастрирован, сломана лапа (вывернута), старый сросшийся перелом.
Может его ищут
+79800209596 Ольга
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
#нам пишут
Уважаемые односельчане, и все неравнодушные, я прошу дать огласку моей истории, Ночью 29.08.2026 года, в д.Березкино, Владимир, который является вет врачом ( по адресу пос. Дорохово, СНТ Надежда, д90) зашёл к нам на участок, увёл из вольера нашу собаку по кличке Берта, посадил ее в машину и увёз в деревню Лыщиково, где просто выкинул ее на дороге. Утром мы обнаружили пропажу собаки, подняли камеры, на кото…
Потерялась кошечка, зовут Кроша, 24 августа ночью в КП Руза резорт, деревня Акулово
Трехцветная кошечка, ухоженная и очень адаптирована к людям, из приметного: ОШЕЙНИК ОЛИВКОВОГО ЦВЕТА
Вознаграждение, если кошка будет найдена - 20 000 рублей
Очень ждём её дома, буду признательно за любую информацию
Тг: @bybsik_05
Номер телефона: 89162285613 Юлия
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
❗️❗️Найдена собака❗️❗️
Немецкая овчарка, девочка, молодая
Очень ласковая и добрая
Найдена в деревне Еськино
Если Вы узнали свою собаку позвоните по номеру +79037111202
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
#нам пишут
Ищу хозяев потеряшки. Или кто-то хочет взять себе. Кот, чистый, ухоженный, проверенный в ветклинике в Рузе. Сейчас он в Старониколаево на передержке. Месяц назад его видели в Нестерово. Или может кто-то знает его хозяев. Прошу откликнуться. Звонить писать 89253700574
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
#взято из чата
❗️ПРОПАЛА СОБАКА❗️ НЕСТЕРОВО
В деревне Нестерово пропала собака по кличке Лайя, порода-лайка.
📞 Телефон для связи:
+7 (926) 700-15-12
Если вы видели Лайю или знаете, где она находится, пожалуйста, сообщите нам. Будем благодарны за любую информацию!
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
#нам пишут
Здравствуйте! Нужна огласка!!! Кто-то выбросил огромное количество декоративных крыс, помогите пожалуйста
Рузский муниципальный округ
Московская область
https://yandex.ru/maps?whatshere%5Bpoint%5D=36.458179684322374%2C55.83893233977881&whatshere%5Bzoom%5D=15.073455&ll=36.458179684322374%2C55.83893233939458&z=15.073455&si=vktkq5rxdr8kt1q9454hr2p1gw
@ruzadistrict - новости Рузского района
⚡️В Москве начался суд по новому уголовному делу основателя агрохолдинга «Русское молоко»
Василия Бойко-Великого обвиняют в растрате средств банка «Кредит Экспресс» путем выдачи фиктивных кредитов. Вменяемый ущерб - 48 миллионов рублей. Вместе с Бойко перед Фемидой предстали еще семь человек. Это уже второй процесс о хищениях в данном финансовом учреждении. В октябре 2023 года одиозного предпринимателя приговорили к…
#нам пишут
Добрый вечер, разместите, пожалуйста, объявление о пропаже собаки, в канале Рузского района, спасибо!
Волоколамск, деревня Гусенево. 89173948930
Луна пропала сегодня ночью в Волоколамске, Московской области, деревня Гусенево. Прошло уже больше 11 часов, нам хозяевам сообщили только сейчас.
ГДЕ ВИДЕЛИ В ПОСЛЕДНИЙ РАЗ.
Была замечена сперва у магазина СНТ Импульс, далее побежала через поле и деревню Гусенево…
🙏50❤3😭3
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @ruzadistrict. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ruzadistrict edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новости Рузского района” (@ruzadistrict), 12,064 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruzadistrict.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.