Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for рузик🥟🥟 рест

Channel

рузик🥟🥟 рест

@ruzicqq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

436subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814053181
TypeChannel
Username@ruzicqq
Created6 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ruzicqq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4264364316 August 2026 — 427 subscribers6 August 2026 — 427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 430 subscribers21 August 2026 — 426 subscribers28 August 2026 — 430 subscribers12 September 2026 — 436 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 425–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:17436+6
28 Aug 2026, 16:57430+4
21 Aug 2026, 03:12426-4
13 Aug 2026, 03:56430+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:30427no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:20427first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

218 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4822.0%
custom 52265097192664140423717.0%
custom 54719607909258448333616.5%
🍓3114.2%
❤‍🔥219.63%
custom 6089396085283887679198.72%
custom 5379968144838254695115.05%
🐳94.13%
custom 537284994950971284762.75%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mrkyw67Photo

ойой к #WSN_FEST 🩸 #шкрябушки

🍓7

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC84 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

мне необходима эта дружба.

❤‍🔥9

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC86 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

вообще,я очень надеюсь что в новом сериале гп будет дружьа между близнецами и ли джорданом

custom 54719607909258448338custom 52265097192664140425🍓2custom 60893960852838876792

6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC85 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

клянусь он был бы лютым бро близнецов уизли и ли

💘8🍓2

6 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC126 views66 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

оставлю как скетч,потому что эээыыыьььбб гарри поттер вуенг анимаг #wooyoung

custom 522650971926641404229custom 547196079092584483316💘14❤‍🔥2custom 53728499495097128472🍓1custom 53799681448382546951custom 60893960852838876791

5 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC126 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @aestnextdoorPhoto

ᅠ ᅠ #sungho #art ⸰ֺ⭑˖ ࣪ ִֶָ ᅠ ִֶָ . ָ࣪ tarte aux pommes? ᅠ

custom 60893960852838876795🐳1

5 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC94 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ariniarthzzzPhoto

#yunho

custom 537996814483825469510❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC142 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dranik_lohPhoto

Сборная солянка всяких невыложенных приколюх разной степени давности🥺

🍓9custom 60893960852838876798❤‍🔥4custom 53728499495097128473🐳1

3 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC137 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yassuragiiPhoto

‘постоянно, день за днем, я снова и снова возвращалась в лес. летние дни пролетали за играми в горах. и даже простые мелочи приносили уйму радости’ #yeosang #ateez

🐳6custom 60893960852838876793custom 52265097192664140422custom 53728499495097128471

1 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC148 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я только что проснулась,всем спасибо за репосты

💘20🍓7❤‍🔥5🐳1custom 52265097192664140421

1 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC176 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

для милой шоты!

custom 547196079092584483312💘6🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ruzicqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рузик🥟🥟 рест” (@ruzicqq), 436 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruzicqq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.