Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for القران الكريم

Channel

القران الكريم

@rwosmn

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,116subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201397969
TypeChannel
Username@rwosmn
Descriptionكتاب الله العظيم الجليل كﻻم الله عزوجل دواء لمافي الصدور يقتل الشيطان الرجيم ويحرقة القران الكريم عﻻج من السحر والمس والعين والحسد ومردة الشياطين تم أضافة التجويد وتحفة اﻻطفال والرقية الشرعية جروب القرآن https://t.me/+w9HRacVB2Fs0OTlk للتواصل⬇ @TahggAlam
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rwosmn

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

13.9 average views per post against 8,116 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.171%. Across the 6,739 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 3.39% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.39%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 July 2026 30 August 2026)
Posts measured185 of 185 published in the window (185 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,563
Mature posts only0.255% over 107 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,116 measured 27 August 2026
Cohortb3162:ara · 6,739 channels · p10 1.35% · p25 3.39% · p50 7.39% · p75 14.5% · p90 25.5%
Position in cohort0.475th percentile · 1/43 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.036% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,0748,1168,0956 August 2026 — 8,076 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,076 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,074 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,076 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,107 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,116 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,068–8,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 21:238,116+14
25 Aug 2026, 05:288,102-5
22 Aug 2026, 10:488,107+5
19 Aug 2026, 04:588,102+10
15 Aug 2026, 19:168,092+16
12 Aug 2026, 13:368,076+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:538,074-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:008,076no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:558,076first reading

Engagement

185 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.171%
avg views ÷ 8,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.9
185 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
185
of 185 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held185 (2 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,563
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,220
Videos
10,300
Links
1,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 17m
Average length
4m 58s

Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC3 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤍 تستغفر كثيرًا ولا ترى شيئًا يتغير؟ ربما فاتك هذا المعنى…👇 http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0 🕊️ دعاءٌ نسيته… لكن الله لم ينسَه! ماذا لو كانت الإجابة أقرب مما تظن؟👇 http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0

28 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC3 viewsread 28 August 2026

💥من جواهر الشافعي : ثمان معانٍ تختصر الحكمة👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/21428 ⁉️كيفية ⚙العمل 📖بالآيات القرآنية👇سورة الملك 👇 https://t.me/chbihiilham/482608

28 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC1 viewsread 28 August 2026

💥من جواهر الشافعي : ثمان معانٍ تختصر الحكمة👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/21428 ⁉️كيفية ⚙العمل 📖بالآيات القرآنية👇سورة الملك 👇 https://t.me/chbihiilham/482608

28 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC1 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤍 تستغفر كثيرًا ولا ترى شيئًا يتغير؟ ربما فاتك هذا المعنى…👇 http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0 🕊️ دعاءٌ نسيته… لكن الله لم ينسَه! ماذا لو كانت الإجابة أقرب مما تظن؟👇 http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0

28 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC3 viewsread 28 August 2026

🔥 محتوى يومي جاهز للنشر📱📱📱 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0

28 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC2 viewsread 28 August 2026

▪️من كنوز الشافعي ثمان معانٍ تلخص الحكمة كاملة، التفاصيل في الأسفل👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/21428 📲 لمحبي الواتساب(حالات قصيرة ورسائل)👇🏻 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0 💯للدعم @Al_foursan

26 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC3 viewsread 26 August 2026

🫣 لماذا حشرت امرأة لوط مع قومه ولم يقع منها فعل فاحشثهم⁉️ https://t.me/fwayiid/19692 يا من تبحثون عن زيادةٍ في الأجر، وعن آياتٍ لا تكتفي بقراءتها بل تريد أن تعيشها وتعمل بها…حيّاكم الله معنا 🤍👇 https://t.me/juzeama/136594

26 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC3 viewsread 26 August 2026
Photo

📚 لمن أراد أن يُحسّن تلاوته دروس في التجويد ومخارج الحروف، مع شرح متن الجزرية والإجازة. http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0 🌹لروحك نصيب من وقتك كلمات، تذكيرات ومحتوى يمنح يومك لمسة مختلفة. http://t.me/addlist/8qShzgu43uxjYTE0

26 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC4 viewsread 26 August 2026

🧐 لماذا شمل العذاب زوجة لوط رغم براءتها من فعل قومه ؟ التفاصيل في هذا المقطع 👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/19692 📲 لمحبي الواتساب(حالات قصيرة ورسائل)👇🏻 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0 💯للدعم @Al_foursan

26 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC3 viewsread 26 August 2026
Photo

📱 لمحبي الواتساب🔽🔽 t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0 حالاتك تعبر عن مشاعرك😋

Showing the 12 most recent of 185 posts we hold for @rwosmn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 631,999 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“القران الكريم” (@rwosmn), 8,116 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rwosmn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.