Channel
@ryitzar_fred
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
200subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002610710830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ryitzar_fred |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ryitzar_fred |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 200 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 201 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 201 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,380 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🗿 | 165 | 12.0% | |
| 🤩 | 158 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 130 | 9.42% | |
| 🆒 | 113 | 8.19% | |
| 🎉 | 104 | 7.54% | |
| 🥰 | 103 | 7.46% | |
| 👏 | 94 | 6.81% | |
| 🍾 | 91 | 6.59% | |
| 🐳 | 90 | 6.52% | |
| 🔥 | 89 | 6.45% | |
| 💯 | 83 | 6.01% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 4.57% | |
| 🍓 | 54 | 3.91% | |
| 🌭 | 43 | 3.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍️Атлетик вышли со своими вариантами кого подписать на левого защитника, если не Холла. Из главных целей - Давид Раум и Хуан Миранда. Второстепенные варианты - Квентин Мерлин и Эль Хаджи Малик Диуф. За Раума и Миранду лайк (особенно за второго (возраст)), за Диуф диз, Мерлин соу-соу.
👍35🍾16❤14🔥14🤩14🎉11
✍️The Swedish Rumble: Cколько может потратить «Юнайтед» в рамках правил FFP? Я делал такие посты на основе данных из отчётов «Юнайтед», которые собрал. Но давайте оценим это на основе внешних источников. Valuball оценивает, что стоимость состава «Юнайтед» составляет 56%, что на 14% ниже порога в 70%. Следовательно — «Юнайтед» может увеличить стоимость состава на 14%/56%=25%. То есть расходы можно увеличить на четв…
🤩49🆒10🌭6🥰5🍓4🗿2
💬Джек Флетчер не имеет никакого смысла. Помимо того, что у Туайтса потенциала больше, для Джека просто нет позиции. Он по природе десятка. Но смешно то, что он так необходим первой команде (зачем-то), что его выпускают правым вингером. Почему он должен в иерархии быть выше остальных, если для него даже нет позиции? Потому что у него физика лучше, чем у того же Туайтса? В таком случае, план развития игроков академии …
🌭32🗿13👏10🍓9🥰8🆒8
💬Джек Флетчер не имеет никакого смысла. Помимо того, что у Туайтса потенциала больше
👏35🍓8👍8🤩8🐳6🍾5
Если мы настолько думаем насчёт техники в полузащите вместо классических полузащитников, то какие проблемы туда поставить Мартинеза? С ним команда автоматически становится на голову сильнее в плане контроля игры, да так, что ни один другой полузащитник команды не даст такого уровня.
🗿42🥰12🍓9🎉9💯6🐳4
Только попробуйте возразить
🔥42🤩8❤7👏7🗿7🆒7
Туайтс и Джей Джей не готовы, но благо у нас есть Флетчеры. https://t.me/manutd_one/72779
👍16🆒9🍓7💯7🔥6🗿6
? https://t.me/LSR_RM/83500
🆒45❤10🔥9🐳8🌭5💯4
Photo, posted without a caption
🍾40🎉8👏8❤7🥰7🗿6
💬Думаю, "МЮ" всё равно пойдёт за ЛЗ, и из-за ценника это будет не Холл. За весь год, моё внимание привлекли лишь 3 игрока, это Арсен Куасси,Самуэль Даль и Пеп Чаваррия, который теперь в "Челси". Рынок фулбеков не очень насыщен чем-то по настоящему интересным.
💯40👏17🍾8🤩8❤4🆒3
Всем подъездом надеемся, что после того, как Винисиус подписал контракт с "Реалом", "Арсенал" пойдёт за Рэшфордом
🥰44🤩13🎉9👍9💯7🔥5
Сборная Испании 2012 Манчестер Юнайтед идёт за треблом
🎉35🗿12🍾11🍓10🤩6🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ryitzar_fred. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рыцарь Фред AFFGOLD | Егор Белянин p_stavki” (@ryitzar_fred), 200 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryitzar_fred.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.