https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4GcEkt9 Новое видео 🍧
❤1

Channel
@s1lvab0oks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
205subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001981022972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @s1lvab0oks |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/s1lvab0oks |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 205 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 204 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 179 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 172 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 170 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 170 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
121 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 52.9% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 9.92% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 9.92% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.61% | |
| custom 5298921038220902512 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| custom 5413752658236299783 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.826% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4GcEkt9 Новое видео 🍧
❤1
Дочитала сегодня Лабиринт Смерти (забавно, что названия последних двух книг решили перевести наобум), мне дико нравится, уже есть желание перечитать всю серию ахрхпох Последнее пророчество встретило пиздецом жестью с самого начала, но я заинтригована очень В пд обалденная динамика, при этом главы длинные -не ощущается, что книги всего на 300-400 страниц. Этого не хватает МСЭ - мне иногда кажется, что Гаглоев вдохно…
❤8❤🔥2💘2
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4CUQmuk Новое видео 🪼
💘3👍1
сначала "а что плохого в том, что щерба на свою ~10к аудиторию рекламирует использование генеративного ии?" а потом при введении в поисковик пинтереста "часодеи" иишного слопа больше, чем настоящего искусства, псевдо-авторы открыто эксплуатируют труд художников без их разрешения и нагло наёбывают ненасмотренных людей, отказываясь лепить штамп "сгенерировано искусственным интеллектом" туда, где он действительно заме…
❤8❤🔥2💘1
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4apvBen Новая часть инсты персонажей МСЭ вышла! Думаю скоро делать эти инстаграмы и по другим вселенным - если вам интересно, конечно же)
❤6💘3
Тут в часокф снова затронули тему этой недо «художницы», и я решила наконец-то сказать что-то Не хотела по причине того, что я всё-таки не художник, но, честно, меня эта тема с ии в часофд и в целом в творчестве настолько злит, что я уже задумываюсь снять разговорное видео где просто несколько минут подряд буду крыть матом всё вот это Если кратко: видите её работы - в блок нах и никак не взаимодействуйте с контенто…
❤🔥5❤4💋3💘1
Предлогаю всем художницам фд проинформировать свою аудиторию, по поводу этой ии-художницы ( https://t.me/chasodei_cf/6204 ). Просто половина её аудитории даже не знают, что она создаёт свои "арты" путём прогона чужих рисунков через ии #тейк@chasodei_cf | отправить тейк
❤3
А мы вообще-то делали коллаб с Корликс... откладывали дорисовку сто лет Нортон и Лисса молодые🌷
❤8
2700 в тик токе, ура!🥳 И да, у меня внезапно вернулось старое оформление профиля..
❤9custom 54137526582362997834🔥2
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4BPxUJc Новое видео 🥳
custom 52989210382209025124
Вчера дочитала наконец-таки Проклятье Титана, на удивление, она пошла в разы быстрее предыдущих, я могла ее закончить намного раньше Наверное, пока что одна из любимых частей серии, она такая динамичная, при этом очень хорошо раскрывает и новых героев, и старых, и антагонистов, и богов, короче, всё везде и сразу Да и драмы завезли, что надо (но блин плакать было не прикольно спасибо) Ну я уже скачала следующую час…
❤12❤🔥3💘2
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4Nn8Q42 Новое видео (наконец-то снова контент по перси джексону)
🥰8
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @s1lvab0oks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“silva на книжном 💌” (@s1lvab0oks), 205 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s1lvab0oks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.