Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وُجوم .

Channel

وُجوم .

@s77ytt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,561subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381585611
TypeChannel
Username@s77ytt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/s77ytt

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5611,5811,57128 August 2026 — 1,580 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,579 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,577 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,572 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,563 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,561 subscribers28 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,558–1,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:361,561-2
13 Sept 2026, 16:151,563-9
9 Sept 2026, 10:221,572-5
4 Sept 2026, 01:401,577-2
1 Sept 2026, 01:061,579-2
29 Aug 2026, 04:041,581+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:451,580first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.50%
avg views ÷ 1,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 May 202623 August 2026)
Views total39
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 00:26 UTC39 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏تشرح الأمر ألف مرة، ولكنهم لا ينتبهون إلا في المرة التي تُقرر فيها الصمت.

14 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC78 viewsread 28 August 2026

«لا يهُمني أن أكونَ الصفحةُ الأولى، بل أن أكونَ .. المقطع الذي تتذكر الكتاب كلّه لأجله»

23 Jul 2026, 00:37 UTC148 viewsread 28 August 2026

ذهبت أعمارنا في بيئة مريضة، نستهلك فيها أعصابنا لإصلاح ما لم نكسره، ونُبرر ما لا ينبغي تبريرهم، كبرنا ونحن نتعلم كيف ننجو لا كيف نعيش، حتى اكتشفنا أن أثقل الخسارات ليست ما فقدناه من سنوات، بل ما فقدناه من أنفسنا ونحن نحاول التأقلم مع ما لا يشبهنا.

23 Jul 2026, 00:15 UTC150 viewsread 28 August 2026

وأيُّ درسٍ ترفض تعلُّمه سوف يتكرر حتى تتعلمُّه.

9 May 2026, 17:13 UTC382 viewsread 28 August 2026

يعُز على الإنسان أن يمشي سبلًا لا يرغبها ولكنها الحياة.

9 May 2026, 17:13 UTC358 viewsread 28 August 2026

Some closeness is more harmful to the soul than separation.

9 May 2026, 17:13 UTC334 viewsread 28 August 2026

"كل من أُصيب في غير قلبه، مُعافى". ‏- محمود درويش.

9 May 2026, 17:11 UTC311 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏”إنّنا ندفعُ ثمن نُبلنا أكثر من ثمن الأخطاء الَّتي نرتكبها.“

9 May 2026, 17:11 UTC267 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏"أسوأ ما تقدمه لتهوين مصاب شخص ما هو سرد مأساة أفظع من مأساته."

9 May 2026, 17:09 UTC275 viewsread 28 August 2026

كيف يتم اقناع الغصن المكسور أن الريح قد اعتذر؟

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @s77ytt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هَمَســــات مُــحِــبّ ☺
@Beautif_mohab · 44,026
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
عائلتي حياتي
@ameheate · 30,616
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وُجوم .” (@s77ytt), 1,561 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s77ytt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.