Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 深圳狼友公开资源

Channel

深圳狼友公开资源

@s88888w

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

32,844subscribers

-984 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686536583
TypeChannel
Username@s88888w
Description上榜管理员 @SaoNonwbot 深圳交流群 https://t.me/mmwmb
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/s88888w

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,84434,03833,4417 August 2026 — 33,828 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,766 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,754 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,739 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,755 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,844 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,879 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,038 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,859 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,833 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,802 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,856 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,948 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,862 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,911 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,947 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,856 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,928 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,895 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,825 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,789 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,821 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,791 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,742 subscribers4 September 2026 — 33,757 subscribers6 September 2026 — 33,732 subscribers10 September 2026 — 33,478 subscribers12 September 2026 — 33,184 subscribers14 September 2026 — 33,000 subscribers15 September 2026 — 32,941 subscribers17 September 2026 — 32,844 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -984. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,665–34,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:2132,844-97
15 Sept 2026, 16:2132,941-59
14 Sept 2026, 03:3733,000-184
12 Sept 2026, 09:3733,184-294
10 Sept 2026, 05:2133,478-254
6 Sept 2026, 22:0033,732-25
4 Sept 2026, 05:4133,757+15
2 Sept 2026, 22:2933,742-49
1 Sept 2026, 20:2533,791-30
31 Aug 2026, 23:2733,821+32
30 Aug 2026, 23:2433,789-36
29 Aug 2026, 22:1433,825-70
28 Aug 2026, 22:4533,895-32
28 Aug 2026, 00:3233,927-1
27 Aug 2026, 02:5433,928+72
26 Aug 2026, 02:4433,856-91
25 Aug 2026, 04:5433,947+36
24 Aug 2026, 01:3833,911+49
22 Aug 2026, 09:1233,862-86
20 Aug 2026, 23:3333,948first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.98%
avg views ÷ 32,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.019%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held22 (24 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total22,937
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
62
Videos
2
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1090.9%
👍19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 07:47 UTC57 viewsread 20 September 2026

🚇广州资源 🚇佛山资源 🚇中山资源 🚇惠州资源 🚇东莞资源 🚇珠海资源 🚇江门资源 🌎其他城市资源

19 Sept 2026, 10:15 UTC997 viewsread 20 September 2026
Photo

💞樱花の湯·日式裸身风俗 #泡泡浴 #会所 置身于氤氲水汽中🚿,伴着轻柔的和风音乐,🎀让细腻的泡沫包裹全身,独家传承日式泡泡浴技艺🪭,纯口啤服务,私密性很好,温柔细腻的手法带来极致放松体验。柔滑的泡沫轻抚每一寸肌肤,搭配日式传统按摩🎎,舒缓压力,唤醒身体的每一处感官。👍 🌸浪漫之旅A:798元/70分钟 情景环境音乐妙手轻抚欢迎礼, 水润潮汐日式泡泡浴+全身舒压按摩,鸳鸯戏水指尖爱抚+迷音诱惑,感官抚触沉浸式精油SPA,全裸身火山热石抓龙筋释放 🌺深情花欲B:998元/100分钟 浪漫之旅基础上增加深度沉浸式泡泡浴互动,胸推臀推身心漫游,极致性感丝足挑逗,冰火酥麻脱敏训练,龟责&边缘控制三起三落,胸/手/足多重释放,*前列腺高潮(不同体质情欲探索) 📌店铺地址:#龙岗 #南山 #福田 #龙华 因服务消耗精力每日名额有限,请提前预约,感受身心合一的极致享受!💖 频道 @szlsppy 联系 @yhztppy 双向可联系 @rsls

18 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,350 views1 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

咪咪专业Cos主题SPA✨ 【满意度TOP1🔝/深圳地区人气店家】 ------------------------------ #至尊95口爆服务内容(水会-会所 📱A套餐95:预约价格550-598 (70分钟内 口一次手一) 📱B套餐96:预约价格750-788 (70分钟内 口爆两次) 📱C套餐97:预约价格998 (双飞80分钟口爆两次) 📱D套餐97:预约价格998 (双钟120分钟口爆两次) 以上套餐包涵磨棒体验 ------------------------------ #极品94推油或丝足(水会-会所) 📱预约价格398-498 📱服务同上 最后手打 或丝足 (70分钟可出水两次不另收费) ------------------------------ #深圳全区全套98(工作室) 📱全套提供客室价格600起 📱外出上门全套价格800起 ------------------------------ 诚信做人

1

15 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈2,680 views0 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

#深圳会所 #深圳按摩SPA #深圳抓龙筋 深圳独家【全新体验】半裸♥️顶级SPA +热石私享沉浸式抓龙筋,“细腻深处直达云顶之上,余音袅袅身心共振享受非凡” 纯口碑,不偷一分钟,时间内无限次释放:胸推,臀疗,龟头责边缘控制,强制高潮,脱敏疗法,三起三落,体验不一样的爽感,头皮酥麻虐恋求饶的感觉,反复高潮,长达5-10分钟。 【私享A课】体验价700/80分钟 【私享B课】体验价900/90分钟 可胸、可手、可足多重释放 位置:#南山 #福田 #宝安 #龙华 #罗湖 ​私聊: @sznsmmspa 频道:@qypdb 🐧QQ:3760728326

12 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC≈3,660 views1 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

艺名: #菲菲三通 地址:#罗湖区 茶费:#500/p 800/p三通加米可以无套,每个月都体验 私聊:@feifeier68666 频道:https://t.me/feifei5551

👍1

11 Sept 2026, 07:53 UTC≈3,980 viewsread 20 September 2026
Photo

【艺名】:#仙小野 【地址】: #南山区 【联系】: @rkyvimga 【频道】:https://t.me/+2oMNy0ESmbphN2Q1

10 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 19 September 2026

. 👇下面各城市互推资源👇 1.个人老师免费推广 2.白嫖卷、优惠券,红包各种活动等你

9 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC≈4,340 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

我这里是个人工作室 环境舒适干净,用品一客一用一消毒。本人素质高,擅长专业日式半裸抓龙筋和前列腺按摩,能给您带来身体的深度放松和欢愉感。正规理疗,激情互动,,哥哥们可加名片咨询哦🥰😊 联系: @xiao1787801 QQ: 2329588774 #深圳SPA

1

9 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC403 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

深圳|🔥TOP级私享抓龙筋体验 前列腺高潮体验过没?非常爽!!! 半裸调情+深度脱敏不限次嗨放SPA,体验不一样的爽感,爽到灵魂出窍,长达5-10分钟 沉浸式放松 · 全程深度释放节奏掌控张弛有度,感官逐步放大,让你在极致舒适中不断突破临界点,一次体验,多重感受重新定义你的放松方式。 玩法十足满足你所有的幻想。不追短期热度,只求长期价值 QQ:2960749896 预约☎️:@szliaoyuSPA 频道:https://t.me/szlhrispa 初探: 699/80分钟 沉浸: 998/100分钟 位置:#深圳南山 #福田 #罗湖 #宝安

28 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,460 views0 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

📱📱9️⃣5️⃣📱📱 海选基地 🤣5️⃣6️⃣8️⃣全裸口一60分钟📱 🤣7️⃣5️⃣8️⃣全裸口二80分钟📱 🤣1️⃣0️⃣8️⃣8️⃣双飞 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 无需会员丶无需定金丶现场海选 免费留宿丶免费停车丶避雷首选 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 🔎🔎🔎🔎📱📱📱📱 ⚠️出于安全考虑只接待有预约的 ⚠️本店没预约没有95项目 📱📱📱📱 @chenchen9495 电话预约😂 19974841225 双向机器人😳 @szhs9995bot 频道分享 https://t.me/shzenzh995 #深圳会所 #95口爆 #十年老店 #全裸 #高清无码 #深喉口爆

15 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈5,010 viewsread 9 September 2026

✅全国低中高端外围✅ https://t.me/vuvvvvvvvvv

14 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC≈5,490 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

😝🤩😜🤪 【艺名】: #貂蝉学妹 【地址】: #南山区 【联系】: @Jenniferchun 【频道】: https://t.me/jennifergett

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @s88888w. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@s88888w edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 September 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“深圳狼友公开资源” (@s88888w), 32,844 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s88888w.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.