Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "° مـلاذ الــروح °"™

Channel

"° مـلاذ الــروح °"™

@s_h_s_h_3

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,574subscribers

+78 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001202044706
TypeChannel
Username@s_h_s_h_3
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/s_h_s_h_3

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,04211,57411,3088 August 2026 — 11,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,491 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,474 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,403 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,356 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,345 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,315 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,273 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,304 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,334 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,284 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,257 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,229 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,211 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,194 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,171 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,173 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,152 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,117 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,060 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,042 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,091 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,171 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,182 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,518 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,574 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,962–11,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:1811,574+56
16 Sept 2026, 00:4211,518+336
14 Sept 2026, 07:0211,182+11
12 Sept 2026, 16:5911,171+80
10 Sept 2026, 15:3911,091+49
7 Sept 2026, 13:4111,042-18
4 Sept 2026, 13:1811,060-57
1 Sept 2026, 21:4811,117-35
31 Aug 2026, 20:5711,152-21
30 Aug 2026, 22:3711,173+2
30 Aug 2026, 00:1311,171-23
28 Aug 2026, 21:4711,194-17
27 Aug 2026, 21:0911,211-11
26 Aug 2026, 20:2411,222-7
25 Aug 2026, 18:0911,229-28
24 Aug 2026, 17:0511,257-27
23 Aug 2026, 00:0811,284-50
21 Aug 2026, 11:3411,334+30
20 Aug 2026, 11:3211,304+31
19 Aug 2026, 14:5611,273first reading

Engagement

746 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.253%
avg views ÷ 11,574 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.3
158 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
159
of 746 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 158 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held746 (8 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total4,622
Reactions total105
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 72 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12827.1%
🕊6614.0%
❤‍🔥469.75%
🔥428.90%
👏388.05%
🤣336.99%
👍296.14%
🤔183.81%
🍓153.18%
💯132.75%
⚡112.33%
💔71.48%
👀61.27%
😇40.847%
😍30.636%
😐30.636%
😴30.636%
🤩30.636%
🙈20.424%
🙏10.212%
1 further kind10.212%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 746 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 746 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5,608
across the posts below
Posts paid on
49
of 743 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1,520
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s_h_s_h_3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 746 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 01:12 UTC4 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fl_3t

اول شخص يجيب 🍋🍋🍋ولا 🍇🍇🍇ولا 777 ياخذ دب

Signed ︎«ت̤̮ـ.؛ـع̤̮ز̤̮ي̤̮» ︎︎

3 Sept 2026, 01:02 UTC2 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fl_3t

اول شخص يجيب 777 ياخذ 30نجمه رسوم نجمه فقط

Signed ︎«ت̤̮ـ.؛ـع̤̮ز̤̮ي̤̮» ︎︎

3 Sept 2026, 00:49 UTC4 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IUU_ho

تعلن قناة ساد عن مسابقه بسطه بدون نجوم لـ2مراكز المركز الاول 1.مقتنى عصاء المركز الثاني 100نجمه صوت مميز=صوتين صوت عادي =صوت الشروط وهمي رشق تكرار طرد على طول للمشاركه. @IUU_h

Signed ︎︎

3 Sept 2026, 00:41 UTC2 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fl_3t

اول شخص يجيب 777 ياخذ 30نجمه رسوم نجمه فقط

Signed ︎«ت̤̮ـ.؛ـع̤̮ز̤̮ي̤̮» ︎︎

3 Sept 2026, 00:40 UTC3 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @C_33_cc

اول شخص يجيب 777 ياخذ 50 نجمه رسوم 2

Signed "ᵉᶦ''𓆩ه‍تلࢪ𓆪

2 Sept 2026, 20:44 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اشوف التفاعل اذا في مطانيخ بنزل المقتني الفراوله من حط نجوم 😁 كفو

🕊2👏1🔥1

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

2 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC31 views6 reactions50 Starsread 3 September 2026

بنزل مقتني الفراوله من يحط اكثر

👍3👏2🕊1

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

2 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC31 viewsread 3 September 2026

كان القناه مافيها روح عاد ننعشها شوي

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

2 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC32 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ننزل من يحط اكثر مقتني

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

2 Sept 2026, 20:27 UTC29 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @l_T_N_Q

المسابقة مافيها شد ومسابقة تستحق بدون نجوم تريد تشارك رسل اسمك @S_H_S7

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC32 viewsread 3 September 2026

مافي الا اني وانتي

Signed طـنآخهہ‌‏ تعزيـهہ

Showing the 12 most recent of 746 posts we hold for @s_h_s_h_3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@s_h_s_h_3 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

*مين برأيك بغار اڪثر*

  1. *البنات ❤*68%
  2. *الشباب🖤*32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 746 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

ل مغوار
@L_i_o_4 · 1,473
16 posts
"ᵉᶦ''𓆩لـ هتلࢪ𓆪
@C_33_cc · 1,827
15 posts
سبيستون
@vsaxn · 322
12 posts
. ْ𓏺َ 𝐀𝑳-𝐘𝐀f𝐄𝐈 لـ ْ𓏺 .
@y_a_f_a_22 · 1,507
10 posts
ғᴏʀ
@G_G7_G · 7,168
8 posts
»https://t.me/iuxcv
@iuxcv · 2
8 posts
لــ 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮
@pprrii2 · 3,038
7 posts
لـــ ► 𝘿 𝙄 𝙁 ◄
@Dlf2255 · 482
6 posts
لــ 𝙃𝙀𝙇𝙇𝙁𝙄𝙍𝙀..⁨~𖤓๋ࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣩࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧࣧ͜͡ ◄
@L6_d4 · 513
6 posts
لـ إرهابي
@P_Q1_W · 2,932
5 posts
غزݪاڼꨄ
@vvwux · 1,722
4 posts
لـ عبد الرحمن
@ABDH700 · 927
3 posts
لــ 𝑹𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒋​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 𝅘𝅥𝅯
@L6_d7 · 6,915
3 posts
ل تــ،عزي
@fl_3t · 1,084
3 posts
صدفه¹
@r_r_7_9 · 1,064
3 posts
𝐁𝐌𝐖
@v_e_eh · 856
3 posts
.لـ عبـــودム-
@IY_PX · 3,751
2 posts
مصاب بها
@Msi2q · 1,762
2 posts
- وَجع ثقـه .
@Al_Muzn1 · 1,023
1 post
⺌
@HBK_e4 · 672
1 post
.لـ عنـــادム-
@S_W_Rj · 179
1 post
شعور
@T_I_T12 · 1,031
1 post
L . 𝑨𝑲𝑹𝑨𝑴🚸
@T_X_71 · 468
1 post
ـ ضيـــاع.
@U_D_77 · 538
1 post
⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠بنت اليمن🇾🇪
@hdbekdr · 254
1 post
Тьма
@l1_3o · 55
1 post
لـ طـنآخهہ‌⁠
@l_T_N_Q · 458
1 post
『 العـود | 𝓐𝓵𝓞𝓾𝓭 』
@lii_i4 · 4,035
1 post
صور كانها تصويرك
@r_e_eq · 11
1 post
.
@riecci · 10
1 post
꧑ᥲ️᥉ᥲ️ℛᥲ️
@ro_t16 · 431
1 post
تـــــــــراث
@se12xs · 2,749
1 post
غيّم
@so_8t · 390
1 post
- لـ إڪس
@ukuki · 4,711
1 post
𝐁𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐊 ،
@vv_e_el · 227
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عبارات حب نرجسيه💜
@T9x_i99 · 125,443
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
همس العشاق ♥️
@cftyhjnml · 78,927
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
اللهم قلبي
@njhgrdf · 26,515
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"° مـلاذ الــروح °"™” (@s_h_s_h_3), 11,574 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_h_s_h_3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.