Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for у нас уже любовь

Channel

у нас уже любовь

@s_slyubovyu

Not marked by Telegram, checked 26 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

630subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002246941736
TypeChannel
Username@s_slyubovyu
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/s_slyubovyu

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

63063663325 August 2026 — 636 subscribers26 August 2026 — 635 subscribers2 September 2026 — 633 subscribers12 September 2026 — 634 subscribers25 September 2026 — 630 subscribers25 August 202625 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 629–637 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 04:16630-4
12 Sept 2026, 00:19634+1
2 Sept 2026, 18:02633-2
26 Aug 2026, 10:02635-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:30636first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤28972.8%
💔10827.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s_slyubovyu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2024 to 4 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC793 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @mentalhiiPhoto

Адаптация к стрессу Казалось бы, от стресса нужно избавляться, но правда в том, что стресс — это форма адаптации. Когда жизнь меняется быстрее, чем мы успеваем перестраиваться, психика напрягается. Это не слабость. Это попытка догнать реальность. Адаптация к стрессу — это не про железные нервы. Это про гибкость. Что делает нас устойчивее? 🔹 Принятие факта напряжения Чем сильнее мы боремся с самим фактом «мне тяж…

21 Feb 2026, 16:28 UTC608 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @mentalhii

Дыхательная практика Эндрю Вейла: 4–7–8. Быстрый способ, чтобы успокоиться 🧘🏼 Дыхательная техника 4-7-8 помогает снизить тревожность, быстрее заснуть и восстановить внутренний баланс всего за пару минут. 1. Сделайте спокойный выдох через рот. 2. Вдохните через нос на 4 секунды. 3. Задержите дыхание на 7 секунд. 4. Медленно выдохните через рот на 8 секунд. Повторите цикл 4 раза. Важно: выдох должен быть длиннее вд…

❤2

20 Feb 2026, 15:46 UTC582 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @mentalhiiPhoto

Стресс и его влияние на организм 🍃 Задумываемся ли мы о том, как стресс влияет на наш организм и какими могут быть последствия? Когда мы сталкиваемся с опасностью, мозг активирует систему «бей или беги». В кровь выбрасываются гормоны стресса — адреналин и кортизол, после чего: — учащается пульс; — повышается давление; — усиливается приток крови к мышцам; — повышается уровень сахара в крови. Кратковременный стресс …

❤2

19 Feb 2026, 07:20 UTC425 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026

дорогая, у каждой бури в твоей жизни одна цель: укрепить то, что непрочно.

💔3❤2

18 Feb 2026, 17:31 UTC417 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @mentalhii

Помните: забота о себе — это не роскошь, а настройка души. Чем внимательнее мы прислушиваемся к своим струнам, тем чище и глубже наша музыка.

❤3

18 Feb 2026, 16:42 UTC435 views6 reactionsread 25 August 2026

психология не способна исцелить. это знание, которое даёт понимание сути происходящих процессов. только любовь обладает могуществом даровать человеку здоровье. только любовь.

❤6

18 Feb 2026, 16:39 UTC495 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @mentalhiiPhoto

Психология — это струны души ✨ Психология — это наука о душе, о том, как мы думаем, чувствуем, переживаем и взаимодействуем с миром. Она помогает понять, почему мы реагируем на одни ситуации спокойно, а другие заставляют нас испытывать тревогу. Каждый из нас — как музыкальный инструмент. Наши мысли, эмоции, воспоминания — это струны, каждая из которых может звучать гармонично или дребезжать. Психология учит нас с…

❤4

18 Feb 2026, 16:39 UTC515 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

мой новый канал 🫂 https://t.me/mentalhii

❤3

29 Mar 2025, 17:53 UTC≈4,030 views41 reactionsread 25 August 2026

чтобы никогда не ошибаться с выбором, нужно каждый раз выбирать себя.

❤35💔6

21 Mar 2025, 15:32 UTC≈3,590 views29 reactions1 Starread 25 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤21💔8

15 Mar 2025, 17:20 UTC≈4,130 views20 reactionsread 25 August 2026

не воспринимай критику от того, чьим советом ты бы не воспользовался.

❤17💔3

12 Jan 2025, 17:04 UTC≈4,830 views39 reactionsread 25 August 2026

настоящая любовь — это не когда твое сердце бьется сильнее, а когда оно находит покой рядом с тем, кого выбрало.

❤36💔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @s_slyubovyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

эмоциональные всплески
@vsplessski · 49,210
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
M
@mno_mno1 · 25,567
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 46,300
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
lumsml
@lumsmII · 21,628
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“у нас уже любовь” (@s_slyubovyu), 630 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_slyubovyu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.