Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сакральный Сэмпл

Channel

Сакральный Сэмпл

@sacredsample

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

58subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002517467566
TypeChannel
Username@sacredsample
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sacredsample

Growth

575857.59 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers16 August 2026 — 58 subscribers9 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:0658+1
10 Aug 2026, 07:0057no change
9 Aug 2026, 09:1657first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 51m
Average length
22m 12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2543.9%
814.0%
👾712.3%
custom 545869434132313605358.77%
custom 584611845605477953258.77%
47.02%
🗿35.26%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Всем привет! Сегодня хочу рассказать о своих впечатлениях от использования двух синтов от компании Behringer - Spice и Edge. Оба являются репликами Moog Subharmonicon и Moog DFAM соответственно. До оригинальных Moog мне пока добраться не довелось, так что сравнивать с ними не смогу. Это скорее взгляд на сами инструменты без оглядки на оригиналы. Итак, начнем с Edge. Это клон легендарного Moog DFAM (Drummer From Anot

2custom 58461184560547795322

27 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Крутая связка для техно, управление на кончиках пальцах

2custom 54586943413231360532

22 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC50 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну все, я залип совсем в эти две коробочки. На днях напишу о своих впечатлениях. Пока очень интересно 🧐🤓

🔥7👾2custom 54586943413231360531

6 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Уже наверно недели две периодически слушаю и смотрю этот волшебный импровизационный лайв/джем и каждый раз кайфую как в первый. Король импровизации Marc Rebillet в компании легендарного Flying Lotus и Reggie Watts. Флайло, конечно тут как-то слабенько себя проявил, как по мне, но удовольствие невероятное от этой записи.

1custom 58461184560547795321

6 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC49 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/0J8G9qNT7gQ?si=obsPqqDQuPIJjzLV

18 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Сегодня у нас в гостях великий и ужасный Deluge от Synthstrom. Я столько слышал об этом грувбоксе и хорошего и плохого. Если честно, претензий слышал словно бы больше, чем положительных отзывов. Что сформировало мое предвзятое мнение по поводу данного девайса. И вот свершилось - мы встретились. И мои первые впечатление крайне положительные! Во первых, что удивило это очень приятное качество звука и пресетов. Все та

🔥52custom 58461184560547795321

10 Jun 2026, 16:39 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня довелось покрутить пульсар от сомы. В двух словах - залипательная штука. По ощущениям сходу не хватает патчей в комплекте, чтобы в полную силу экспериментировать. В будущем еще покручу и поделюсь впечатлениями

2👾2custom 54586943413231360531

2 Jun 2026, 20:22 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Учавствовал в electro - челлендже в кордсах.

🔥6custom 58461184560547795321

23 May 2026, 22:06 UTC63 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мой старенький сэмплер чего только не повидал, где только не был. И в самых андеграундных местах Москвы, на лесных фестивалях, на улице города. Всем владельцам электронов известна главная болячка девайсов - софт тач покрытие на кнопках. Я уже года два гоняю с облезлыми липкими кнопками, да еще и пыль под экраном - кошмар, одним словом. И вот волею судьбы нашел на полке на работе плату от дигитакта с браком и свежим

🔥53👾3🗿1custom 54586943413231360531

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sacredsample. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сакральный Сэмпл” (@sacredsample), 58 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sacredsample.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.