Channel
@sad_creator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,851subscribers
-636 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001978633532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sad_creator |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sad_creator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 5,851 | -167 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 6,018 | -131 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 6,149 | -100 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 6,249 | -88 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 6,337 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 6,365 | -31 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 6,396 | -23 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 6,419 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 6,450 | -34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 6,484 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 6,487 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 6,487 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
657 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 267 | 40.6% | |
| 😱 | 170 | 25.9% | |
| 👀 | 150 | 22.8% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 4.11% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 3.04% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Every single xAI co-founder is now gone. Not one left. The remaining two co-founders, Manuel Kroiss and Ross Nordeen, have left as well, meaning all 11 original builders who started xAI with Elon Musk have exited in under 3 years. This comes amid layoffs, restructuring and Musk openly admitting the company "wasn’t built right" and needs rebuilding. The company was recently acquired by Musk’s SpaceX, bringing SpaceX…
👍13😱12🔥9
🚨 Bhutan is dumping Bitcoin… again. Another 519 BTC ($37M) just moved, which is a part of a larger trend that has already seen $100M+ sold this year and reserves drop from 13,000 BTC to nearly 4,400. A country that once bet its future on Bitcoin is now steadily trimming exposure. So what’s really going on here... Is smart money taking profits and a sovereign state de-risking after massive gains? Or is it a quiet ex…
👀15👍14😱12
🚨 Will Ethereum crash to $1.2K next? Analysts are warning ETH could drop another 40% if key levels break with weak demand, whale distribution, and macro fear all stacking against it. The same pattern already triggered 45-48% crashes twice before… and now it's forming again. So what is really going on here? Is this just another bear trap (ETH always looks dead before a major rally) or is Ethereum losing strength ind…
👍13
6 straight months of losses for Bitcoin… worst period since 2018. >> BTC is on the edge of a historic breakdown. The BTC price action touches $65K to start the week as traders expect a copycat bear flag breakdown. >> Iran headlines dominate the macro mood amid rumors of a US ground invasion. March could go either way for Bitcoin as it sits on the edge of its first six-month losing streak since 2018. >> Whales have…
👍11😱11
🇺🇸David Sacks just left the White House. The CLARITY Act is still stalled. The stablecoin bill is unfinished. The strategic Bitcoin reserve hasn’t been funded. The crypto council never happened. And the 100-day promise on market structure legislation is forgotten. This is the person the entire crypto industry celebrated as their man inside the most powerful office on earth. The industry donated, lobbied, and cheered…
👀15👍14
Crypto donations exceeded $1B in 2024. And in Africa, the infrastructure built with that money is quietly failing. Nobody wants to talk about that. 👇Here is the pattern: Charity token launch or NFT drop generates buzz and goes viral -> capital flows and optimism peaks -> then the launch window closes, and nothing is left behind except a transaction hash and broken infrastructure that nobody was funded to maintain. …
👀15👍13
A federal judge just blocked the Trump administration’s attempt to blacklist Anthropic, calling the move likely retaliatory and legally shaky. The Pentagon labeled an American AI company a “national security risk” because Anthropic refused to let its AI be used for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. The court basically said: you can’t punish a company for disagreeing with government policy. Some people said…
🎉14👍14😁13
🔥 OPENAI JUST KILLED “EROTIC MODE,” AND PEOPLE ARE MAD (OR ARE THEY?) OpenAI hyped an "adult mode" for ChatGPT… Then suddenly pulled the plug "indefinitely." Why? - employees felt uncomfortable - investors pushed back - concerns about mental health, safety, and minors Sounds responsible… right? Or is it something else? It looks like AI companies want to decide what humans are allowed to explore. OpenAI keeps launc…
👍12😱11
BREAKING HISTORY OR BREAKING NORMS? 🇺🇸💵 President Donald Trump is now the first sitting U.S. president in 165 years to put his signature on American paper currency, breaking a tradition where only the Treasury Secretary & Treasurer’s autographs appeared on banknotes. 👉 According to the Treasury, this is to celebrate the USA’s 250th anniversary and symbolize strength & economic pride. But let’s be honest, this smel…
👀15👍13
If you still think AI is impartial… think again. Wikipedia has been systematically “poisoned” by pro‑Iran edits, and that because LLMs pull heavily from Wikipedia, those models are now spitting out propaganda shaped by geopolitical agendas, not truth. 👀📉 Meanwhile, AI agents are being used to waste scammers’ time for hours on end but the real story is underneath: what does it mean for trust in AI when the data backb…
😱14👍13
Is Bitcoin's biggest weakness… about to become Ethereum's biggest bull case? A growing narrative says Bitcoin is falling behind on quantum resistance, while Ethereum is actively building a post-quantum roadmap. Some are even warning that Bitcoin's core cryptography could become obsolete, and devs are too slow or unwilling to adapt. The Bitcoin community is split on how to deal with it, with some advocating for upgr…
😱13👍12❤10
Bitcoin is beating gold during the Iran war… but is it actually a safe haven? During the Iran conflict, BTC outperformed gold and even rallied at times, yet every escalation still triggered selloffs and risk-off behavior. Before the Iran war, Bitcoin spent months trading sideways while gold rallied to record levels. At the time, gold was seen as the go-to safe haven. Inflation concerns remained persistent and geopo…
👀15👍14❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sad_creator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sad Creator” (@sad_creator), 5,851 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sad_creator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.