Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سعید مبشر

Channel

سعید مبشر

@saeid_mobasher_71

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,588subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001488279944
TypeChannel
Username@saeid_mobasher_71
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/saeid_mobasher_71

Growth

1,5411,5921,566.56 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,541 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,571 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,573 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,575 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,576 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,578 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,581 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,584 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,592 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,588 subscribers1,5886 August 202611 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,533–1,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:411,588-4
5 Sept 2026, 18:201,592+8
1 Sept 2026, 13:351,584+3
29 Aug 2026, 18:261,581+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:361,578+2
23 Aug 2026, 10:281,576+1
19 Aug 2026, 18:111,575+2
16 Aug 2026, 15:431,573+2
12 Aug 2026, 20:341,571+30
9 Aug 2026, 21:511,541-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:041,546+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:021,545first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 02s
Average length
2m 24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dbv3ROtC1YM/?igsh=MTB1MW5hd2htajM2cA== شعرخوانی تازه در اینستاگرام. لطفا تماشا کنید و با لایک و کامنت و شیر حمایت کنید.❤️ @saeid_mobasher_71

7 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC271 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

که من به سوی تو می‌آمدم گروه گروه #سعید_مبشر @saeid_mobasher_71

7 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

صدا چه خاصیتی داشت در تکلم تو؟ #سعید_مبشر @saeid_mobasher_71

6 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

اینو چون چند نفر پرسیدن بگم. اول بگم محتواش چیه "بیان و بدیع" جلسه‌ی اول: آشنایی جلسه‌ی دوم: تعریف شعر و بیان و بدیع جلسه‌ی سوم: تشبیه ۱ جلسه‌ی چهارم: تشبیه ۲ جلسه‌ی پنجم: مجاز ۱ جلسه‌ی ششم: مجاز ۲ جلسه‌ی هفتم: کنایه جلسه‌ی هشتم: بدیع ۱ جلسه‌ی نهم: بدیع ۲ (آرایه‌‌های لفظی) جلسه‌ی دهم: بدیع ۳ (آرایه‌های معنوی) .... "درباره‌ی شعر" جلسه‌ی اول: کلیات بحث جلسه‌ی دوم: رابطه‌ی عین و ذهن جلسه‌ی سوم: فرم جلسه‌ی چهارم:

6 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026

دوستان یک نکته‌ای بگم. البته شاید قضاوت شم به تکبر و این‌چیزها. ولی واقعا در فارسی‌نویس‌های ایرانی معاصر تئوری قوی‌ای درباره‌ی شعر وجود نداره. الان ممکنه اسم اساتید بزرگواری به ذهنتون بیاد که شهرتش چارگوشه‌ی ایران رو گرفته. بله این‌ها مشهورن و قابل احترام. اما واقعا تئوری شخصی و جدی مبتنی بر چهارچوب فلسفی و علمی ندارند.

6 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بوطیقا رو تونستیم اون موقع ضبط کنیم تقریبا.

6 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026

. جالبه که کتاب اول رو کامل و قسمتی از کتاب دوم رو با برخی از دوستان همین کانال خواندیم. متاسفانه استقبال خیلی کمه وگرنه هر چهار کتاب رو دوست دارم بارها دوره کنم با علاقه‌مندان.

6 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC124 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بوطیقای ارسطو. نقد قوه حکم کانت. زایش تراژدی نیچه. سرآغاز کار هنری هایدگر. این سه‌کتاب بهتون می‌گه.(توصیه نمیشه چون کتابای تخصصی‌ان)

6 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC151 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

. چیزی به عنوان مسیر شعر امروز برام مهم نیست. تک و تک آدم‌های جدی و واقعی برام مهم‌ان. و اگر بپرسید آن تک و توک آدم‌های جدی غزل رو پیش بردن؟ می‌گم بله. هنر چیزی نیست که اکثریت بتونه پیش ببرنش. تک نابغه‌ها فقط مهمن.

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC155 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بداهه یعنی چی؟ خب همون رو جدی بنویسید. و اینکه منتظر شعر موندن مثل منتظر پول موندنه. پول خودش به حساب واریز نمیشه. تلاش و وقت گذاشتن.

6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC162 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

اگر در ابتدا و میانه‌ی شعر گفتنید خیلی بخونید. همه رو بخونید. تاریخ ادبیات فارسی رو خوب بخونید. بهترنشدن طبیعیه ولی خوب نیست.

6 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC160 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

من راز شعرها را می‌دانم. باید هزارساعت نشست و گفت و شنید. از شعرگفتن گاهی بیشتر از شعر برای من لذت بخشه.

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @saeid_mobasher_71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سعید مبشر” (@saeid_mobasher_71), 1,588 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saeid_mobasher_71.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.