Channel
@safach1k
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002436457452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safach1k |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safach1k |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 74 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 75 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 76 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 77 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 77 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
60 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5416020435328323867 | 14 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5260249633724056527 | 12 | 20.0% | |
| custom 5467897983792080934 | 5 | 8.33% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5280971768595510229 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5391032521758643185 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5368621511257125143 | 1 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5462867451807031771 | 1 | 1.67% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вот и скетчи и фулл рисунки хихи, как знал утром что надо их сфоткать где-то бридж, где то я рину рисовал, где то светофор... #скетч #скетчбук #коллаж
custom 52602496337240565272❤1custom 54160204353283238671custom 54628674518070317711custom 54678979837920809341
ВСЕМ ЗДРАСЬТЕ долгожданный коллаб с риной Я МОЛЮСЬ НА ЕЕ ПАРТ (на свой тоже), на мой взгляд у нас гармонично вышло 😽😽 повторюсь да что там ирл мы иии подписывайтесь нв рину 😸
custom 54160204353283238676custom 52602496337240565272custom 52809717685955102292custom 53910325217586431851
Здрасдвуй Дмитрий, еще раз увижу что ты спровляешь нужду на мою машину теье будет не хорошо
❤5custom 53910325217586431851
+1 еще в коллекцию #видео
custom 54160204353283238674😴2custom 52602496337240565271
+1 НОВОЕ ВИДЕО ОТ ПРОЦЕССА КОТОРОГО Я САМ ОЧЕНЕЧЕЧЕНЬ БАЛДЕЮ 💔💔💔 сохранил три серии для видео и вроде даже норм ссылкооч #видео
❤2custom 54160204353283238672😴1custom 53686215112571251431
привет с того света я тут до 17)))
custom 52602496337240565273custom 54678979837920809343
У МЕНЯ НАМЕЧАЕТСЯ ЦЕЛЫХ ДВА КОЛЛАБА 🌚
❤4
РМНУ УБЬЮ спасиба за рэпост моего прекрасного творения
❤1custom 54160204353283238671
я его потом опубликую у меня тут пиво вино шампанское бред питт #видео
❤2custom 52602496337240565271
НЕ поздравляю он дегенерат
у Леона кеннеди вчера был др.
custom 52602496337240565272custom 54678979837920809341
ещё на меня удаленный акк какой-то подписался я обоссался
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @safach1k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сафа чикчч” (@safach1k), 74 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safach1k.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.