Channel
@safefoodmatters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001814652121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @safefoodmatters |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/safefoodmatters |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 24 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 23 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇨🇦 Should Canada be raising the bar on food safety—or lowering it? In this clip from Mary Lou’s interview with Keith Wiley of “The EcoCentric Radio Show,” she points out that Canada is choosing to align more closely with the U.S. and Australia on pesticide standards instead of following countries like France, which has taken a stronger stance to protect its food supply. Canada should be leading on food safety—not l…
⚠️ STOP SCROLLING. If you’re still in disbelief that glyphosate is harmful to your health, you need to watch this. Here’s your proof. Watch the full interview only on CHDTV: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/glyphosate-injury-miracle--how-to-do-a-safety-study/
😡1
🇨🇦 Federal Cabinet Gives Itself Power to Sidestep Regulations, Including on #Pesticides Mary Lou McDonald spoke with Keith Wiley on "The Ecocentric Radio Show” about the government’s new powers to sidestep regulations, including those affecting pesticides and environmental protections. They also discuss Safe Food Matters' ongoing #glyphosate litigation. Read more: https://safefoodmatters.org/2026/07/10/federal-cab…
⚖️ 🇨🇦 Glyphosate Lawsuit Is Still Alive Since 2017, Safe Food Matters has been challenging Health Canada’s renewal of glyphosate for pre-harvest use—and as President Mary Lou McDonald says, “It’s still alive.” A court date is expected this summer, so stay tuned for updates as this important case moves forward! Full interview: 🔗 https://safefoodmatters.org/2026/07/10/federal-cabinet-gives-itself-power-to-sidestep-r…
Photo, posted without a caption
Bill C-30 is now law. Safe Food Matters President Mary Lou McDonald explains why the legislation represents a significant shift in Canada’s approach to democracy and pesticides. Bill C-30 was rushed through Parliament as budget legislation despite containing major pesticide policy changes. The bill grants Cabinet sweeping powers to overrule scientific findings of harm, raising concerns about transparency, accountab…
Public health organizations call on federal government to stop weakening pesticide safeguards Omnibus legislation is ramming through Bills C-30 and C-31, which take away legal protections against pesticide risks...all in the name of undefined "economic security." Contact your MPs https://www.cpha.ca/pesticides #pesticides #Canada #safefoodmatters
☠️🇨🇦 Why Does Canada Keep Toxic Pesticides on the Market? An eye-opening OpEd by Bruce Lanphear explores how pesticide regulation works in Canada — and why some chemicals linked to health and environmental concerns remain in use. Read more: 🔗https://safefoodmatters.org/2026/05/31/how-canada-keeps-toxic-pesticides-on-the-market/ . . . #Pesticides #FoodSafety #EnvironmentalHealth #SafeFoodMatters
🚨If a pesticide is known to cause harm, is it OK to keep it on the market? New amendments buried in Bills C-30 and C-31 would give politicians the power to trump scientific findings of risk and also eliminate current mandatory scientific reviews and public input. Safe Food Matters is joining organizations across Canada 🇨🇦 in calling for these changes to be removed. Read more: 🔗 https://safefoodmatters.org/2026/05…
👍1
🇨🇦 Proposed Changes to Canada’s Pesticide Laws Bills C-30 and C-31 would make significant changes to Canada’s pesticide regulatory system. Bill C-30 would allow Politicians to override science-based pesticide decisions, while Bill C-31 would remove mandatory cyclical safety reviews and associated public input. Together, these changes weaken both scientific and democratic accountability in Canada, and favour pestici…
😡1
HEALTH CANADA 🇨🇦 POWER GRAB Weakens Public Check on Pesticides and PFAS Health Canada wants Canadians to just trust them on pesticide approvals—here’s SFM President Mary Lou McDonald explaining why we don’t. 🔗 https://safefoodmatters.org/2026/02/12/legal-challenge-filed-over-federal-approval-of-pfas-pesticide/ . . . #Pesticides #PFAS #HealthCanada #SafeFoodMatters #Canada
Happy healthy #MothersDay from #SafeFoodMatters 🍓🧀🥂 #ChooseOrganic #GlyphosateFree
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @safefoodmatters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Safe Food Matters” (@safefoodmatters), 24 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safefoodmatters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.