Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,444. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,388–3,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:59
3,062
-92
13 Sept 2026, 15:19
3,154
+538
10 Sept 2026, 00:20
2,616
+392
4 Sept 2026, 16:39
2,224
-22
1 Sept 2026, 09:56
2,246
-39
29 Aug 2026, 03:13
2,285
+192
26 Aug 2026, 10:52
2,093
+380
23 Aug 2026, 14:05
1,713
+33
17 Aug 2026, 13:33
1,680
+14
14 Aug 2026, 01:28
1,666
+10
11 Aug 2026, 00:01
1,656
+37
7 Aug 2026, 16:50
1,619
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:02
1,618
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 58s
Average length
1m 59s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
52
43.0%
👍
44
36.4%
😢
15
12.4%
🕊
5
4.13%
👏
3
2.48%
👌
2
1.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«کوری» اثر ژوزه ساراماگو
کوری استعارهای از انسانی که نمیبیند
در این جلسه قرار نیست فقط داستان را مرور کنیم؛
کار ما تحلیل است: بررسی لایههای فلسفی، اخلاقی و اجتماعی رمان و پرسشهایی که ساراماگو دربارهی انسان، جامعه و معنای انسانبودن مطرح میکند.
در این نشست دربارهی این موضوعات گفتوگو خواهیم کرد:
🔹 کوری بهعنوان استعارهای از نادانی، بیتفاوتی و از دست دادن بینش اخلاقی
🔹 شکلگیری شر؛ از خشونت فردی تا فروپاشی…
لیزا جوئل در کتاب به خانه راهش نده با شخصیتپردازی قوی، پیچیدگیهای روایت و غافلگیریها خواننده را به سفری پرکشش و نفسگیر، زیر ذرهبین روانشناختی دعوت میکند.
این رمان تکاندهنده و دلهرهآور با رازهایی برملانشده و تعلیق بسیار تا اواخر داستان، علاوهبر آموزنده بودن، بار تجربههای مخاطبانش را نیز سنگینتر از قبل خواهد ساخت.
لیزا جوئل، استاد نوشتن تریلرهای روانشناختی برای شگفتزده کردن مخاطبان و طرفدارانش است.
رمانی …
از منظر نقد ادبی، فاوست اثری چندسَبکی (Hybrid) است که عناصر کلاسیکگرایی وایمار، رمانتیسم آلمان، درام فلسفی و شعر نمایشی را در هم میآمیزد.گوته با عبور از قواعد کلاسیک وحدت زمان، مکان و کنش، ساختاری اپیزودیک و نمادین خلق میکند که بیش از روایت، بر سیر تکامل اندیشه و تجربه انسان تمرکز دارد.
فاوست را میتوان برجستهترین نمونه درام فلسفی مدرن دانست؛ اثری که در آن شخصیتها صرفاً کارکرد روایی ندارند، بلکه تجسم مفاهیمی چون…
📚 اگر دنبال کتابهای کوتاه برای شروع آشنایی با آثار خولیو کورتاسار هستید، این مجموعهها انتخابهای خوبیاند:
• «آزادراه جنوبی و داستانهای دیگر»
ترجمۀ احسان چادگانی | نشر خوب
• «پیجو»
ترجمۀ سحر یوسفی | نشر فرهنگ نشر نو
• «بااهمیتها و بیاهمیتها»
ترجمۀ پژمان طهرانیان | نشر اتفاق
• «امتحان نهایی»
ترجمۀ مصطفی مفیدی | نشر نیلوفر
• «آگراندیسمان و چند داستان دیگر»
ترجمۀ امید نیکفرجام | نشر چشمه
• «لِیلِی»
ترجمۀ کیومرث…
دوشنبه از ساعت هشت تا نه و نیم شب، دربارۀ شاهکار سالینجر، ناطور دشت، گپ میزنیم
و وجوه مختلف این اثر رو بررسی میکنیم.
اگر دوست دارید همراه ما باشید، برای مشاوره و ثبتنام به این آیدی پیام بدید:
@ka_adminnm
همراهی شما باعث افتخار ماست.
دربارۀ کورتاسار، نویسندهای که امر عادی را ناگهان غریب میکند
خولیو کورتاسار از آن نویسندگانی است که مرز میان واقعیت و خیال را از میان برمیدارد. در جهان او، اتفاقهای عجیب ناگهان از دل زندگی روزمره سر برمیآورند؛ بیآنکه شخصیتها یا حتی خواننده مطمئن باشند از چه لحظهای همهچیز تغییر کرده است.
سبک کورتاسار را میتوان رئالیسم شگفت، روایت تجربی و ادبیات بازیگوش نامید.
او به ساختارهای کلاسیک داستان وفادار نمیماند؛ ب…
چرا بعد از سالها، هنوز صدای هولدن کالفیلد اینقدر زنده است؟
سلینجر فقط یک شخصیت خلق نکرد؛ او صدایی آفرید که با مکثها، تکرارها، پرشهای ذهنی و زبان محاوره، مرز میان راوی و خواننده را از بین میبرد.
در این ورکشاپ، کشف میکنیم سلینجر چگونه با زبان و شیوهی روایت، یکی از ماندگارترین صداهای تاریخ ادبیات را خلق کرده است.
اگر میخواهید «ناطور دشت» را از زاویهای متفاوت و عمیقتر بخوانید، همین امروز برای ثبتنام پیام بدهی…
میشل فوکو در تاریخ جنون نشان میدهد که جنون فقط یک مسئلهی پزشکی نیست؛
بلکه مفهومی است که در طول تاریخ، با قدرت، جامعه و شیوهی نگاه ما به دیگری گره خورده است.
در ناطور دشت، با شخصیتی روبهرو هستیم که مرزهای پذیرفتهشدهی جهان اطرافش را پس میزند و همین ما را با پرسشی مهم مواجه میکند:
چه کسی حق دارد مرز میان عقل و جنون را تعیین کند؟
در ورکشاپ ناطور دشت، رمان سلینجر را از منظر اندیشهی فوکو میخوانیم.
مشاوره و ثبتن…
👍6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @safemordegan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@safemordegan named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ka_adminnm named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@safemotdegan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بزم موسیقی 🎧 @bazm_m · 26,117 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 September 2026
کتاب های دوست داشتنی من @nazaninenshaei · 30,744 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صف مردگان (داستاننویسی و نقد)” (@safemordegan), 3,062 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safemordegan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
