Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•

Channel

๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•

@safiiyam

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

26,495subscribers

+125 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001989976702
TypeChannel
Username@safiiyam
Descriptionะœั‹ ะบะฐะถะดั‹ะน ะฟะพัั‚ ัะพะทะดะฐั‘ะผ ั ะปัŽะฑะพะฒัŒัŽ๐Ÿ’Œ ะ ะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ: @bakhadirovnn
CreatedBetween 1 June 2023 and 31 December 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/safiiyam

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

28,000 average views per post against 26,495 subscribers โ€” an engagement rate of 105.8%. Across the 38,278 registered channels in the same cohort โ€” 10,000โ€“31,622 subscribers โ€” the middle half sit between 3.09% and 14.3%, with a median of 6.98%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 August 2026 โ€“ 26 September 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled224,180
Mature posts only105.8% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers26,495 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000 ยท 38,278 channels ยท p10 1.20% ยท p25 3.09% ยท p50 6.98% ยท p75 14.3% ยท p90 24.9%
Position in cohort99.838th percentile ยท 15.2ร— the cohort median
Uncertaintyยฑ0.114% of the figure, from Telegramโ€™s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร— away from that cohortโ€™s median โ€” above it โ€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโ€™s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

26,16726,73426,450.510 August 2026 โ€” 26,370 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 26,356 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 26,271 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 26,329 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 26,241 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 26,202 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 26,167 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 26,212 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 26,259 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 26,486 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 26,452 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 26,493 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 26,498 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 26,722 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 26,734 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 26,665 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 26,571 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 26,449 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 26,319 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 26,481 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 26,659 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 26,621 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 26,592 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 26,572 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 26,496 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 26,473 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 26,272 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 26,550 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 26,527 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 26,495 subscribers26,49510 August 202617 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 39 days, net +125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 26,082โ€“26,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:3926,495-32
15 Sept 2026, 17:3726,527-23
14 Sept 2026, 04:3926,550+278
12 Sept 2026, 09:1826,272-201
10 Sept 2026, 07:0026,473-23
7 Sept 2026, 01:2026,496-76
4 Sept 2026, 07:3726,572-20
2 Sept 2026, 20:2826,592-29
1 Sept 2026, 22:1426,621-38
1 Sept 2026, 01:0626,659+178
31 Aug 2026, 03:5726,481+162
30 Aug 2026, 05:0626,319-130
29 Aug 2026, 05:4126,449-122
28 Aug 2026, 04:2826,571-94
27 Aug 2026, 01:0926,665-69
26 Aug 2026, 02:1426,734+12
25 Aug 2026, 04:5326,722+224
24 Aug 2026, 03:3526,498+5
22 Aug 2026, 08:1426,493+41
20 Aug 2026, 19:1726,452first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
105.8%
avg views รท 26,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
28,000
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.56%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held31 (14 July 2026 โ€“ 21 September 2026)
Views total224,180
Reactions total1,255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ3,210
Videos
โ‰ˆ505
Links
โ‰ˆ16

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

4,365 reactions across 26 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค2,06747.4%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1,05224.1%
๐Ÿ”ฅ65415.0%
๐Ÿ’”59213.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 4,365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 18:39 UTCโ‰ˆ7,580 views114 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Bloom๐Ÿฅน Stories

โค68๐Ÿ”ฅ17โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ16๐Ÿ’”13

16 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTCโ‰ˆ17,600 views196 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

ะบั€ะฐัะพั‚ะฐ๐Ÿ’• Stories

โค117โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ32๐Ÿ”ฅ28๐Ÿ’”19

13 Sept 2026, 05:35 UTCโ‰ˆ23,900 views127 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ˜ Stories

โค61โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ29๐Ÿ”ฅ20๐Ÿ’”17

8 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTCโ‰ˆ29,500 views214 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

โค92โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ49๐Ÿ’”44๐Ÿ”ฅ29

2 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTCโ‰ˆ40,400 views229 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Awwww๐Ÿ˜ Stories

โค119โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ49๐Ÿ”ฅ33๐Ÿ’”28

31 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTCโ‰ˆ37,700 views181 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Sushiholic๐Ÿฅข Stories

โค80โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ45๐Ÿ’”31๐Ÿ”ฅ25

31 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTCโ‰ˆ30,600 views41 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ13โค12๐Ÿ’”8๐Ÿ”ฅ8

29 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTCโ‰ˆ36,900 views153 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’—

โค78โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ37๐Ÿ’”19๐Ÿ”ฅ19

25 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTCโ‰ˆ37,100 views160 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

ะฝะพั‡ะฝะฐั ะดะพัั‚ะฐะฒะพั‡ะบะฐ)๐Ÿ™ˆ Stories

โค72โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ38๐Ÿ”ฅ29๐Ÿ’”21

23 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTCโ‰ˆ35,700 views203 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

ะฝะฐ ะฝะพั‡ัŒ ะณะปัะดั โฃ๏ธ Stories

โค84โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ63๐Ÿ’”28๐Ÿ”ฅ28

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @safiiyam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegramโ€™s own answer, not this registerโ€™s. When this register asks Telegramโ€™s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ€” never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโ€™s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

๐‘ด๐’Š ๐’‚๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’‚๐Ÿ’—
@storiiz ยท 24,145
#1
with love, G
@belovve ยท 8,763
#2
๐“ฉ__๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐”‚๐Ÿ’™
@leylinurimm ยท 10,380
#3
๐‘จ๐’Ž๐’๐’“ ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’•๐’Š ๐Ÿค
@amor_fati_hayoti ยท 5,667
#4
ั…ะพั‡ัƒ ัะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ
@xochuskazatt ยท 16,498
#5
๐“ถ๐“ช๐“ญ๐“ฒ๐“ช๐“ผ๐“ผ'๐“ถ๐“ฒ๐“ป ๐Ÿ•Šโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ
@madiassmir ยท 11,453
#6
ะŸั€ะพัั‚ะพ
@prosto_ll7 ยท 2,372
#7
Osmona ุณู…ุงุก๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
@osmonabegim ยท 4,475
#8
Mental Think
@mental_think ยท 1,006 (as read 12 September 2026)
#9
แดส sแดแดœสŸ
@RSS023 ยท 2,703
#10
Russia | Crypto
@FCM_RU ยท 1,965
#11
ัั…ะพ ะผั‹ัะปะตะน
@exomisleyy ยท 44,148
#12
Withlovezunaโ™ฅ๏ธ
@withlovezuna ยท 1,956
#13
๐“œ๐”‚ ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฏ๐“ฎ๐Ÿ’—
@storiestash ยท 49,483
#14
ะณะพะฒะพั€ะธั‚ ัะตั€ะดั†ะต
@govoritserdce ยท 4,871
#15
talipovar
@tallipovar ยท 522
#16

Read from Telegramโ€™s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ€” how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fason koylaklar ๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿ’
@kuzgi_qishgi_fasonlar ยท 66,457
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 20 here โ€” alongside 19 others โ€” read 20 August 2026
ัั…ะพ ะผั‹ัะปะตะน
@exomisleyy ยท 44,148
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 13 here โ€” alongside 12 others โ€” read 28 August 2026
๐“œ๐”‚ ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฏ๐“ฎ๐Ÿ’—
@storiestash ยท 49,483
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 25 here โ€” alongside 24 others โ€” read 25 August 2026
๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ๐Ÿ’Œ
@storiesinstaa ยท 24,163
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 48 here โ€” alongside 47 others โ€” read 16 September 2026
SALATLAR RETSEPTI
@salatlar_retsepti ยท 56,986
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 25 here โ€” alongside 24 others โ€” read 22 August 2026
ั‚ะต ัะฐะผั‹ะต ะณะพะปะพัะพะฒั‹ะต
@treki333 ยท 72,140
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 31 here โ€” alongside 30 others โ€” read 28 August 2026
Dietolog Tursunboyeva๐ŸŒฟ
@dietolog_tursunboyeva ยท 279,159
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here โ€” alongside 63 others โ€” read 10 August 2026
KUAF (official)๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ
@kuaf_edu ยท 37,265
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐’€๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐‘บ๐Ÿ’•โ€ (@safiiyam), 26,495 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/safiiyam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.