Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Online Crypto School🌏

Channel

Online Crypto School🌏

@sagarocs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,159subscribers

-569 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001231864069
TypeChannel
Username@sagarocs
DescriptionCryptocurrency News Update , Wazirx , Bitcoin , Free Calls And All Crypto currency update. TECHNICAL CRYPTO COMMUNITY TEAM 🚀🚀🚀😊 BUSINESS ENQUIRIES 👇👇👇 [email protected] Note : Sell Buy in your own Risk⚠️ DYOR/NFA
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sagarocs

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7499,7448,246.57 August 2026 — 8,728 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,728 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,683 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,595 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,563 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,541 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,528 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,512 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,486 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,414 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,344 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,292 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,252 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,215 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,167 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,210 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,945 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,856 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,826 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,798 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,766 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,749 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,744 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,786 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,221 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,159 subscribers8,1597 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net -569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,300–10,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:518,159-62
2 Nov 2026, 18:078,221-565
30 Oct 2026, 16:348,786-958
27 Oct 2026, 12:159,744+2,995
24 Oct 2026, 16:286,749-17
21 Oct 2026, 07:146,766-32
18 Oct 2026, 07:296,798-28
15 Oct 2026, 07:166,826-30
12 Oct 2026, 09:386,856-89
5 Oct 2026, 17:206,945-265
28 Sept 2026, 01:177,210-957
18 Sept 2026, 19:008,167-48
14 Sept 2026, 08:368,215-37
10 Sept 2026, 22:208,252-40
6 Sept 2026, 05:008,292-52
1 Sept 2026, 19:138,344-70
29 Aug 2026, 16:348,414-72
26 Aug 2026, 11:438,486-26
23 Aug 2026, 11:388,512-16
20 Aug 2026, 07:218,528first reading

Engagement

286 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.55%
avg views ÷ 8,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
208
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 286 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held286 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total10,611
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,830
Videos
≈71
Links
≈4,420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 65 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10663.5%
🔥3521.0%
👍148.38%
😱84.79%
👌31.80%
💯10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Cz kal kuch indication de raha tha Ham samj nahi paye 🧐

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC195 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Video time nikal ke dekh lena ♥️♥️♥️

🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC223 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪔 Light up Diwali with Bitunix’s special trading fest! 🎉 Join Bitunix’s Diwali Dhamaka Trading Celebration and unlock exclusive rewards made for crypto traders. - Grab a 200 USDT BTC/USDT Futures Position Voucher (available for the first 500 users only) - Compete in the trading contest and fight for a share of the 20,000 USDT prize pool - Earn extra volume rewards of up to 70 USDT on top Campaign runs from 2 Novem…

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 03:20 UTC201 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Video time nikal ke dekh lena ❤️ 100+ Likes 👍 complete karwao motivation milta hai 🔥

👍3

4 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC218 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Democrats plan to investigate crypto industry's financial ties to President Trump and his family, Bloomberg reports.

4 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC200 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Over $900,000,000,000 added to the US stock market at open after Democrats win control of both the US House and Senate.

Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @sagarocs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @sagarocs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WazirX Announcements
@wazirx · 96,627
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Tek Baaz
@TekBaaz · 23,264
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
Kuch New For You
@kuchnewforyou · 18,359
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Bitcoin Expert India
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,762
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
IguVerse
@Iguverse · 18,725
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Online Crypto School🌏” (@sagarocs), 8,159 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sagarocs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.