Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PLAYERS

Channel

PLAYERS

@saintplayers

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,114subscribers

+672 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821095939
TypeChannel
Username@saintplayers
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/saintplayers

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

12,400 average views per post against 7,114 subscribers — an engagement rate of 174.1%. Across the 25,659 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.41% and 20.1%, with a median of 10.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (4 August 2026 3 September 2026)
Posts measured12 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled148,610
Mature posts only174.1% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,114 measured 31 August 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 25,659 channels · p10 2.69% · p25 5.41% · p50 10.7% · p75 20.1% · p90 33.6%
Position in cohort99.875th percentile · 16.3× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.06% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 3 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,4427,1146,7786 August 2026 — 6,442 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,442 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,845 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,086 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,078 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,094 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,102 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,112 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,113 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,114 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +672. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,341–7,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 14:067,114+1
28 Aug 2026, 09:247,113+1
25 Aug 2026, 04:397,112+10
21 Aug 2026, 14:477,102+8
18 Aug 2026, 17:327,094+16
16 Aug 2026, 02:477,078-8
12 Aug 2026, 21:087,086+53
9 Aug 2026, 23:337,033+188
7 Aug 2026, 00:206,845+403
6 Aug 2026, 03:206,442no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:356,442first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
174.1%
avg views ÷ 7,114 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,400
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 June 202617 August 2026)
Views total148,610
Reactions total3,185
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,890 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524922081483794815382928.7%
custom 525614855843167348767923.5%
custom 525163132228315680152618.2%
custom 530754355443480425551417.8%
custom 524926353687764028834211.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈17,800 views202 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Оставляйте в комментариях фидбек и присылайте фотографии что забрали из дропа 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥5️⃣

custom 530754355443480425599custom 524922081483794815355custom 525163132228315680135custom 525614855843167348713

14 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC≈4,190 views184 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Подписка на закрытый клуб www.playersclub.zone

custom 525614855843167348792custom 524922081483794815349custom 530754355443480425537custom 52516313222831568016

11 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈24,100 views229 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

GREY P t-shirts WWW.PLAYERSCLUB.ZONE

custom 5307543554434804255111custom 525614855843167348764custom 525163132228315680148custom 52492208148379481536

11 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈5,740 views277 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

RED P t-shirts WWW.PLAYERSCLUB.ZONE

custom 5249220814837948153135custom 525614855843167348780custom 530754355443480425561custom 52516313222831568011

11 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈4,930 views225 reactionsread 20 August 2026

— завтра-послезатра начинаем отправку заказов

custom 5249220814837948153114custom 525614855843167348760custom 525163132228315680146custom 53075435544348042555

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈29,300 views204 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

PLAYERS ONLINE www.playersclub.zone

custom 5256148558431673487112custom 524922081483794815348custom 525163132228315680137custom 53075435544348042557

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈7,480 views267 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

5️⃣

custom 5251631322283156801126custom 525614855843167348768custom 524922081483794815354custom 530754355443480425519

7 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈6,060 views172 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ваши голоса ускоряют релиз https://t.me/boost/saintplayers

custom 525614855843167348785custom 524922081483794815346custom 530754355443480425536custom 52516313222831568015

6 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈9,150 views426 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

07.08 — 15:00 (MSK) — ONLINE

custom 5249220814837948153220custom 5256148558431673487105custom 525163132228315680179custom 530754355443480425522

6 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈25,500 views374 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Это первая часть дропа, уже завтра онлайн, время сообщим позже, дроплист вечером 🏷️

custom 5249263536877640288184custom 530754355443480425597custom 525163132228315680173custom 524922081483794815320

6 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈2,860 views330 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @oblagramPhoto

5TH ANNIVERSARY Pt.1 — 07.08 — ONLINE

custom 5249263536877640288158custom 524922081483794815382custom 525163132228315680170custom 530754355443480425520

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @saintplayers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PLAYERS” (@saintplayers), 7,114 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saintplayers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.