دوست دارم آقا ادرویت

Channel
Sajad Shahi
@sajshah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
109,546subscribers
+33,685 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001959492139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sajshah |
| Description | 🟠SoundCloud soundcloud.com/sajadshahi 🟢Spotify open.spotify.com/artist/3VzZOmXc8pZRfNxoiliE1A 🔴YouTube youtube.com/@SajadShaahi 🟣Instagram instagram.com/sajadshaahi ⚫️AppleMusic music.apple.com/us/artist/sajad-shahi/1640091683 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sajshah |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:50 | 109,546 | +325 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 109,221 | +546 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:54 | 108,675 | +637 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:18 | 108,038 | +244 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:26 | 107,794 | +245 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 107,549 | -33 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:55 | 107,582 | +43 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:48 | 107,539 | -71 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 107,610 | +55 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 107,555 | +60 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 107,495 | +67 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:39 | 107,428 | +173 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 107,255 | +332 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 106,923 | +762 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 106,161 | +6,819 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 99,342 | +142 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 99,200 | +96 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 99,104 | +118 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 98,986 | +224 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 98,762 | first reading |
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 51.8%
- avg views ÷ 109,546 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 56,700
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (26 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,304,060 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 22s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5,792
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 118
- of 138 we hold a reading for · 86%
- Most on one post
- 1,290
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sajshah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video message, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
باهاتون مثل خودتون بازی میکنم
یه ج*د رو نمیشه باورش کرد
از همه بابت بی ادبی این دوروز معذرت میخوام دست بوستونم❤️
خسته شدم از تکی جنگیدن از اون اول زندگی همیشه مفبر میشدم
Video, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
ساعت ۸
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @sajshah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @sajshah as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 23 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@RapFarsCity · 59,34017 postsRaproom | رپ روم
@TheRaproom · 16,8149 posts𝗔𝗛𝗔 𝗥𝗔𝗣 | اها رپ
@AhaRapOfficial · 15,5416 postsRap FarsiNewz | رپفارسی نیوز
@Rap_FarsiNewz · 47,3696 postsPouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 62,9836 postsMhsenivx
@mhsenivxx · 253,0005 postsلطفى
@lotfiMGMT · 6,3573 postsBig Shaggy
@Big_Shaggyy · 43,1812 postsRap3da | رپصدا
@Rap3daMedia · 8,3532 postsرپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 244,8572 postsTrap Pulse
@TrapPulse · 21,4472 postsAshkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 119,6102 postsSicko
@itseverythingaboutme · 3522 postsDark mod🕸️🕷️
@mobinhdfelas · 2192 postsRJ
@rip_amirali · 6,2702 postsShervinn
@shervinnmgmt · 1,7542 postsسوگی
@soogowu · 102,1392 postsتیمارستان ترپ💁🏿♂️
@timarestan_trap · 15,7732 postsتنایج و نظرات کاربران چیتانت
@CheetahNets · 1211 postComment Rapi
@CommentRapi · 27,3901 postGift Forc
@Giftforc · 7,4311 postGrimeZone | گرایم زون
@GrimeZone · 12,6061 post1Hunna
@Hunnaone · 3911 postViper
@Lilmo021 · 2481 postAR$HI
@Prodbyarshi · 6391 postRAPGOD | رپ گاد
@RAP_GOD66 · 41,1311 post𝗢𝗡𝗟𝗬𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗖𝗔𝗥_
@ROOM_SIZDAH · 15,6081 post𝗥𝗮𝗽𝗶𝗪𝗮𝗿
@RapiWar · 64,7901 post𝗧𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹 𝗥𝗮𝗽
@Troll_Rap2 · 11,3541 postA💤
@White7XIT · 971 postBenjam💤🥷🏻
@bengam0 · 4,5351 post🌀
@bluesiidd · 471 post𝑫𝒆𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
@fuckingdelusion · 4101 postWania
@made0fvanilla · 7881 post4:20💕
@mybeeeee420 · 3781 post🪬
@nafas56 · 7221 post𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝗯𝘆𝗮𝗳𝗮𝘇𝗭𝘇
@prodafaz · 1981 post808Bvby
@prodby8B · 5231 postRed Trap
@redtraap · 1,8941 postمورفین | Morphine
@shadow_alonex · 5651 post.
@shahiiiot · 431 postsᴀᴠᴇᴅ ᴍᴇᴍᴏʀɪᴇs"
@sloeow · 771 postA.💘
@storymadi · 1,1341 postتکست رپی [ Text Rapi ]
@texttrapi · 52,8711 postWasted
@wasted021 · 2481 post🪩🛌
@xXxdonyaaa · 2111 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HipHopTweety · 269,3406 postsلطفى
@lotfiMGMT · 6,3574 postsPouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 62,9834 postsTrap Farsi
@TrapeFarsi · 47,8763 postsرپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 244,8572 postsHipHop FUN Quiz
@hiphopfunquiz · 101,0832 postsRapCity
@rapcity · 82,2942 postsBig Shaggy
@Big_Shaggyy · 43,1811 postMhsenivx
@mhsenivxx · 253,0001 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@HipHopTweety · 269,3405 postsTrap Farsi
@TrapeFarsi · 47,8763 postsBandshami
@bandshami · 1042 postsHip X Hopi
@hip_hopi · 389,2892 postsHipHop FUN Quiz
@hiphopfunquiz · 101,0832 postsرپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 244,8572 postsRapCity
@rapcity · 82,2942 postsRap King
@rapking · 313,9682 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tijayamin · 76,205#1
@HipHopTweety · 269,340#2
@VinakOfficial1 · 85,914#3
@hesamtiemchannel · 75,494#4
@hip_hopi · 389,289#5
@Aliegeramy1 · 30,984#6
@hiphopfunquiz · 101,083#7
@putakk · 219,382#8
@TrapeFarsi · 47,876#9
@catchySR · 33,165#10
@dalumc · 18,148#11
@HipHopi_archive · 52,998#12
@ciainthehood · 24,926#13
@xGoFuck · 10,181#14
@soallk1 · 15,027#15
@thrvshyyy · 2,166#16
@MoreShahin · 3,181#17
@mamazi · 14,673#18
@ashkan_kagan · 119,610#19
@olaghiadroit · 62,983#20
@aligeramy · 50,042#21
@rapking · 313,968#22
@tiemeshon · 150,554#23
@rapcity · 82,294#24
@RegaPlus · 1,509,386#25
@sharikjormeasli · 28,966#26
@funhiphop · 293,821#27
@RapGodNews · 183,511#28
@RapBad_Newz · 244,857#29
@futballbadtv · 318,622#30
@mvshiontop · 11,093#31
@raptv · 393,540#32
@eycin23 · 45,689#33
@koorowshOfficial · 105,118#34
@NimaDW1 · 4,563#35
@youngsudden8 · 10,343#36
@RapRelease · 81,840#37
@RapCityWorld · 26,655#38
@iRoProxy · 7,994,058#39
@iMTProto · 7,730,279#40
@zZRap · 63,919#41
@RapPlusNews · 85,524#42
@RapiWar · 64,790#43
@AlmightyAliz · 2,988#44
@Mowj4 · 722,020#45
@Ma4TaLegacy · 4,029#46
@erfanpaydartelegram · 12,019#47
@lildeafo · 4,153#48
@pookeroot · 7,752#49
@TrapCafe · 40,496#50
@Codeain · 348,592#51
@drtel · 782,926#52
@NaslePanj5 · 4,389#53
@residambetashh · 55,653#54
@hiiphopfree · 105,651#55
@proxy_qavi · 3,260,320#56
@Aliztory · 161,795#57
@darkproxy · 4,574,975#58
@rmanwildcat · 8,076#59
@afshartikk · 132,523#60
@NextUpGen · 3,364#61
@initiatur · 208,226#62
@veecxx · 11,543#63
@dgixapp · 15,612#64
@RealRibar · 4,255#65
@tniiiy · 2,488#66
@hamclasixii · 112#67
@HipHopiFreeArchive · 35,902#68
@rvdingetouttahere · 761#69
@ArmanMiladiMusic · 1,759#70
@proxymtproto · 11,862,632#71
@TrapEdu · 1,199#72
@SportBaadNews · 845,357#73
@razcom · 1,218,490#74
@RealSamanWilson · 24,243#75
@FUTBALLI18 · 481,215#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Aliegeramy1 · 30,984
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
@tijayamin · 76,205
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@VinakOfficial1 · 85,914
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@ciainthehood · 24,926
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026
@hesamtiemchannel · 75,494
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
@catchySR · 33,165
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
@papillonisam · 18,696
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 October 2026
@vinak · 350,072
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 31 August 2026
@shayannyo · 101,399
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@FourTwentyPlayList · 48,855
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
@aligeramy · 50,042
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@Chvrsi · 19,457
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@rapfa · 26,327
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
@TrapeFarsi · 47,876
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@putakk · 219,382
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
@ShayanEshraghi · 22,647
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
@moodsgraphy · 26,786
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
@godpoori · 45,044
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@FootballVerseNews · 48,119
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 1 September 2026
@koorowshOfficial · 105,118
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
@ittahass · 109,103
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
@BigShaggyReal · 37,423
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 September 2026
@Free_HipHop · 32,388
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
@olaghiadroit · 62,983
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 105 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sajad Shahi” (@sajshah), 109,546 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sajshah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.