Channel
@salafi_sejati
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,643subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001749265146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @salafi_sejati |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/salafi_sejati |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 1,643 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 1,648 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 1,650 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 1,659 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 1,655 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 1,657 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 1,656 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,651 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 1,659 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 1,664 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 1,670 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 1,672 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 1,673 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 1,673 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 186 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
PERNYATAAN USTADZ ABU FUAD SAIFUL YANG MENGANDUNG PERENDAHAN TERHADAP FADHILATU ASY-SYAIKH DR. ARAFAT HAFIDZOHULLAHU TA'ALA SECARA TERANG-TERANGAN DAN TERBUKA [Versi Status] https://t.me/salafi_sejati/811
👍12
PERNYATAAN USTADZ ABU FUAD SAIFUL YANG MENGANDUNG PERENDAHAN TERHADAP FADHILATU ASY-SYAIKH DR. ARAFAT HAFIDZOHULLAHU TA'ALA SECARA TERANG-TERANGAN DAN TERBUKA Bagi seorang da'i salafi tentunya sangat mengerti dan memahami bahwa diantara kebiasaan ahlul bid'ah adalah suka merendahkan, mencela dan memusuhi ulama atau ahlul ilmi. Abu Hatim Muhammad ar-Razi rahimahullah berkata: علامة أهل البدع الوقيعة في أهل الأثر "…
👍8
Ust Abu Fuad Saiful waffaqahullah dahulu kala sampai-sampai dengan lantang menegur dan membantahnya: “Sebagaimana anda mencela Asy-Syaikh Arafat di majelis terbuka, anda sampaikan bahwa anda salah. Katakan wahai Ust Zuhair bahwa aku Zuhair Syarif salah! Saya bertaubat! saya keliru! saya lancang!” 🎙️ Audio Muhadharah Hari: Jum'at 8 Shafar 1445 H/26 Agustus 2023 M Di Masjid Al-Anshar Besuki Lihat bukti audio-audionya…
👍9
☝️ Mengingat kembali perendahan dan celaan Ust. Zuhair Syarif hadahullah terhadap Fadhilatu Asy-Syaikh Dr. Arafat bin Hasan al-Muhammadi hafizahullah dikarenakan beliau telah memberikan dan mengeluarkan fatwa dan bimbingan saat fitnah mufarriqah asatidzah jumhur!
👍10
PERNYATAAN USTADZ ABU SAID HAMZAH YANG MENGANDUNG CELAAN TERHADAP ULAMA [Versi Status] https://t.me/salafi_sejati/807
👍12
PERNYATAAN USTADZ ABU SAID HAMZAH YANG MENGANDUNG CELAAN TERHADAP ULAMA Sungguh perkara yang sering kita dapati pada setiap fitnah-fitnah yang terjadi, dimana orang-orang yang dulunya dikenal istiqomah diatas prinsip bersama bimbingan ulama rabbani, namun kemudian berubah prinsip dan lebih mengutamakan hudzudzun nafsi serta pendapat dan penilaiannya sendiri. Hal ini pula yang telah menimpa diri Ustadz Abu Said Hamz…
👍8
"Kami memohon maaf, kajian malam ini ditiadakan karena adanya kendala teknis dan jaringan internet yang lemah."
نعتذر عن كليمة الليلة لظرف طارئ ولضعف النت
KABAR GEMBIRA Dengan penuh rasa syukur, kami mengumumkan akan diselenggarakannya sebuah muhadharah ilmiah melalui via telepon yang akan disampaikan oleh Fadhilatu Asy-Syaikh Dr. Arafat bin Hasan Al-Muhammadi hafidzohullah Dengan tema: «نصائح وتوجيهات» "Nasihat dan Arahan" Ditujukan kepada saudara-saudara kita di Kota Surman, Kota Al-Jumail, Kota Zaltan, Kota Bani Walid, wilayah Al-Mutharrad, Kota Ummul Aranib di…
👍12
وفي جزيرة سومطرة ببلد أندونوسيا
👍9
WASIAT IMAM RABI' RAHIMAHULLAH AGAR MERUJUK KE SYAIKH ARAFAT DAN SYAIKH AL-BUKHARI KETIKA FITNAH TERJADI 🎙️ Disampaikan oleh: Ustadz Luqman Baabduh waffaqahullah [Audio Muhadharah Kamis, 17 Dzulqo’dah 1446 H atau 15 Mei 2025 M di Masjid Ali bin Abi Thalib Ma’had Minhajul Atsar Jember] HARAPAN DAN DO'A: Semoga Allah subhanahu wa ta’ala senantiasa mengistiqomahkan salafiyyin di Indonesia agar tetap berpegang teguh d…
👍12
MENGINGATKAN KEMBALI SALAH SATU PRINSIP PENTING KETIKA TERJADI FITNAH Sebuah komitmen yang dibuat oleh Ustadz Luqman Ba'abduh, Ustadz Ruwaifi, Ustadz Abu Said Hamzah, Ustadz Abu Amr Alfian, Ustadz Abu Ammar Yasir, Ustadz Abu Abdirrahman Arif, Ustadz Abu Ibrahim Waliulu, dan Ustadz Abdurrahman Ramli pada hari Jum’at pagi, 30 Jumadal Ula 1447 H atau 21 November 2025 M yang berisi pengingat akan salah satu prinsip pent…
👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salafi_sejati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Salafi Sejati” (@salafi_sejati), 1,643 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salafi_sejati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.