Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for таваккуль.

Channel

таваккуль.

@salafiiiaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003583343057
TypeChannel
Username@salafiiiaaa
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salafiiiaaa

Growth

385144.58 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46 subscribers8 September 2026 — 49 subscribers17 September 2026 — 51 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:2051+2
8 Sept 2026, 18:3849+3
24 Aug 2026, 06:0846+4
16 Aug 2026, 21:2342+4
10 Aug 2026, 21:0138no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:4538first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5425077683836986043419.0%
419.0%
custom 5249445875419226212314.3%
custom 520407453239401419329.52%
custom 522240023013308171429.52%
custom 533251424948064186229.52%
👍29.52%
🕊29.52%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC25 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54250776838369860434custom 52494458754192262122custom 52040745323940141931custom 53325142494806418621

7 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC45 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ошибки ждут от двух людей: 🖤от мужчины с бородой 🖤от женщины в хиджабе у всех остальных все нормально. вера же в сердце должна быть😊

3🕊1custom 52040745323940141931custom 52494458754192262121custom 53325142494806418621

7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Посланник Аллахаﷺ сказал: 🌟«Ни в коем случае не входите к (посторонним) женщинам!» Один мужчина из числа ансаров спросил: «О Посланник Аллаха, а что ты скажешь о родственниках мужа/хамв/?» На это Пророкﷺ сказал: «Такой родственник – это гибель!» 📖Муслим 2172

1🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Посланника Аллаха ﷺ спросили: «Какая женщина является лучшей?» Он ответил: «Та, которая радует его, когда он смотрит на неё, повинуется ему, когда он приказывает ей, и не поступает вопреки его желанию в отношении себя и своего имущества». «Сунан ан-Насаи», № 3231.

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC150 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Посланник Аллахаﷺ сказал: «Поистине, женщина была создана из ребра, и если ты постараешься выпрямить его (полностью), то сломаешь его, а если оставишь его, то этой кривизны будет достаточно, чтобы жить с ней (и наслаждаться ею)». Ахмад 5/150

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @salafiiiaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“таваккуль.” (@salafiiiaaa), 51 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salafiiiaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.