Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صلاحیت بالینی دکتر علی نسخه اوردر

Channel

صلاحیت بالینی دکتر علی نسخه اوردر

@salahiat_balini

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,209subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001068707385
TypeChannel
Username@salahiat_balini
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salahiat_balini

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@noskhenevisi_pezeshkan/3506 May 2024, 18:09 UTC@salahiat_balini/1813 · this entry6 May 2024, 18:13 UTC1.004 minutes
@salahiat_balini/1827 · this entry13 Oct 2024, 22:47 UTC@noskhenevisi_pezeshkan/36213 Oct 2024, 22:47 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@noskhenevisi_pezeshkan7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 May 2024 to 18 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @noskhenevisi_pezeshkan. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,2095,2665,237.55 August 2026 — 5,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,261 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,262 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,265 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,266 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,264 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,253 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,249 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,244 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,237 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,234 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,226 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,221 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,209 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,200–5,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:585,209-12
13 Sept 2026, 16:575,221-5
10 Sept 2026, 07:215,226-8
4 Sept 2026, 15:215,234-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:185,237-7
28 Aug 2026, 15:565,244-5
25 Aug 2026, 07:235,249-4
22 Aug 2026, 16:365,253-11
19 Aug 2026, 03:565,264-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:035,266+1
12 Aug 2026, 23:545,265+3
9 Aug 2026, 16:045,262+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:375,261no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:295,261first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2025, 22:47 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

سوالات احتمالی آذر 1404 آزمون صلاحیت بالینی پزشکی در فایل دانلودی لینک زیر انتشار حداکثری لطفا برای قبولی همه باهم https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/فایل-خلاصه-طلایی-کتاب-جامع-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-دکتر-علی-1404

20 Aug 2025, 09:08 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

دوستان عزیز اپدیت جدید کتاب خلاصه طلایی آزمون صلاحیت بالینی با شایعات آزمون مرداد و شهریور را براتون با پاسخ دقیق از منابع معتبر علمی قرار دادیم میتونین وارد لینک زیر بشید تهیه کنین و آزمون را با سوالات تکراری قبول بشید و بدون استرس رویکرد جدید ما اینه که ذهن شما را منظم کنیم سامان بدیم تا در طبابت هم از این شیوه استفاده کنید https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/کتاب-خلاصه-طلایی-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-مرداد-و-شهریور-1404-…

20 Aug 2025, 09:08 UTC≈2,360 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

دوستانی که قبلا خرید کردین میتونین فایل رایگان مرداد خلاصه طلایی را از آیدی زیر بگیرین فقط اطلاعات خریدتون بفرستین کامل همه سوالات این دوره را پوشش میده @dralihz

15 Aug 2025, 08:49 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

خب دوستان رسیدیم به هفته آخر سوالات شایعه شده و سوالاتی که فک میکنین میاد را برام به آیدی زیر بفرستین جوابش را در خلاصه طلایی مرداد اضافه کنم ما دسترسی به بانک پاسخ سوالات صلاحیت بالینی داریم ولی دقیقا نمیدونیم اساتید و معاون آموزشی هر دانشگاه از بانک سوال چه سوالی را انتخاب میکنند اما اگه شما بگین تیتر سوال را ما پاسخ ش اضافه میکنیم حتی سوالاتی که وزارت بهداشت میفرسته هم محرمانه ست و عده ای میان حدس میزنند و میگن ب…

4 Jul 2025, 11:08 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/دانلود-فایل-کتاب-خلاصه-طلایی-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-اردیبهشت-1404 این خلاصه را از دست ندین قبولی تضمینی تقریبا همه سوالا از این فایل خلاصه میاد خیلی براش زحمت کشیده شده فقط روخونی کنین

11 May 2025, 00:50 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/دانلود-فایل-کتاب-خلاصه-طلایی-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-اردیبهشت-1404

5 Feb 2025, 20:25 UTC≈3,710 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

سلام و دروود خدارا شکر آماده شد از الان به بعد فقط این فایل پی دی اف بخونین سوالات احتمالی پر تکرار و شایعه شده را لحاظ کردیم اصلا وارد حاشیه نشید فقط روخونی کنین کافیه قبولی تصمینی https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/خلاصه-طلایی-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-پزشکی-بهمن-1403 لطفا برای دوستانتونم بفرستین خیلی زحمت کشیدیم روش تا برسه به امروز هزینه شم پول دوتا ویزیت عمومی شماست پس حمایت کنین @salahiat_balini_film

25 Nov 2024, 19:37 UTC≈4,260 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/خلاصه-طلایی-صلاحیت-بالینی-آذر-و-دی-1403

17 Oct 2024, 07:16 UTC≈4,630 viewsread 12 August 2026

دوستان عزیزم امیدوارم هر روز موفق تر از دیروز باشید با توجه به بررسی اولیه ما سوالات همه از کتاب جامع دکتر علی آخرین ورژن اومده بیرون ممنون میشم سوالات را به آیدی زیر بفرستین ایم دانشگاه را بگین حتما برای تحلیل بیشتر این دوره سوالات در اکثر دانشگاه‌ها باهم فرق داشته و دانشگاه برگزار کننده انتخاب کرده نه دانشگاه قطب اون ناحیه ولی سوالات تکراری بوده یعنی حتما در کتاب جامع ما دیدین میخواستم نظرتون درباره کتاب جامع صلاحی…

15 Oct 2024, 23:02 UTC≈3,890 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @salahiat_balini_film

سلام دوستان عزیزم قایل جدید خلاصه طلایی برای مهر ۱۴۰۳ منتشر شد فقط همین و بخونین قبولی https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/خلاصه-طلایی-صلاحیت-بالینی-مهر-1403 خلاصه طلایی آزمون صلاحیت بالینی مهر ۱۴۰۳ قبولی تضمینی لطفا برای حمایت از ما و ارائه محصولات بهتر و تلاش بیشتر لینک سایت به کانال ها و گروههاتون بفرستین ما کلی تلاش کردیم سوالات پیدا کنیم لطفا فایل پی دی اف منتشر نکنین و خرید بزنین این برای پزشکای آینده چیزی نیست…

13 Oct 2024, 22:47 UTC≈3,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

فایل جدید صلاحیت بالینی برای مهر و آبان ۱۴۰۳ در سایت قرار گرفت قبولی تضمینی برای دیدن لینک سایت فیلتر شکن خاموش بهترین گزینه ست https://salahiatbalini.ir/product/کتاب-جامع-آزمون-صلاحیت-بالینی-مهر-و-آبان-1403

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salahiat_balini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

صرفا نسخه‼️
@noooskhe · 49,248
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Med_Skill
@med_skills · 37,802
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
تشخیص های افتراقی
@differential_diagnosis1 · 32,379
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صلاحیت بالینی دکتر علی نسخه اوردر” (@salahiat_balini), 5,209 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salahiat_balini.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.