Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Свят | B2B Sales

Channel

Свят | B2B Sales

@salesvyat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,832subscribers

+49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002181309988
TypeChannel
Username@salesvyat
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salesvyat

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7831,8321,807.56 August 2026 — 1,783 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,783 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,797 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,798 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,794 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,806 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,832 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,776–1,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:201,832+26
13 Sept 2026, 02:191,806+12
9 Sept 2026, 09:401,794-4
4 Sept 2026, 02:391,798+6
31 Aug 2026, 14:131,792+2
28 Aug 2026, 13:221,790-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:281,797+4
22 Aug 2026, 03:461,793-10
19 Aug 2026, 00:231,803+8
15 Aug 2026, 17:141,795+12
6 Aug 2026, 07:011,783no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:361,783first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

768 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥29238.0%
24732.2%
👍17022.1%
👏222.86%
💯81.04%
😇81.04%
😍50.651%
💩30.391%
😁30.391%
🍌20.26%
💋20.26%
🤔20.26%
10.13%
❤‍🔥10.13%
🤝10.13%
🥰10.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 768 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @salesvyat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 December 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC480 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Найти человека по почте — тест нескольких вендоров. С цифрами👇 🎥 Тут подробное видео Проблема: пришли новые клиенты или отвалились старые и мы знаем только почту (надо их удержать или вернуть) Зачем: в базе только email. Чтобы отработать с ними хорошо, надо знать: -Кто это -Из какой компании -Какая роль -Контекст с их сайта -Их поведение в продукте Связка: Anysite.io (живые данные, скрепинг любых источников из ин

🔥9👍5👏42

28 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC860 views19 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Недавно созвонились и познакомились с Деном. Планировали созвон на полчаса, а залипли на 2 😁 Оказалось, что у нас много общих знакомых и тем. От AI и продаж до закрытых стартап-сообществ. Ден делает стартап, привлекал в него гранты и инвестиции. Шарит в маркетинге и мобильных приложениях. Довел приложение Govar с 300 до 5 000 установок вообще без платной рекламы. А недавно еще и пивотнул стартап — нашел неочевидный

14🔥4🤔1

1 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,410 views28 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Телеграм — темная лошадка аутрича Сегодня расскажу как с помощью CRMchat выстроить полный цикл работы с телеграмом и получить лидов из этого канала как можно быстрее 🎥 Тут подробное видео На тёплой узкой аудитории тг бьёт почту в 2–4 раза. Логика простая: → В email хороший холодный реплай — 1–2%, до встречи доходит 0,5% → В телеге на узкую проработанную базу — 10% ответов, и это реальность → Канал тёплый, личку т

🔥11👍98

15 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,370 views25 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎟 На Money20/20 организаторы сами знакомят тебя с нужной компанией Но почти никто этим не пользуется. Только вернулся с Money2020 Europe в Амстердаме. Второй год подряд, одна из самых крупных финтех-конференций Европы. Кстати, при записи видео на эту тему постарался выйти на новый уровень: микрофон, хорошее качество записи, красивый фон все как надо 😂 Заценить видео о Money20/20 можно тут Первое, что хочу разобра

15👍5🔥5

13 May 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,110 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ИИ не всегда экономит время. Иногда убивает. Недавно: разовая задача (скоринг небольшого списка в новом сегменте — то есть правила скоринга не отточены). Час руками. Что-то лень. Беру ИИ — думаю, будет быстрее. В итоге сижу 6 часов вместо 1. И делаю на троечку. Почему? Потому что закладывал в ИИ цель «готовая задача 1 раз». А разовая задача почти всегда быстрее и качественнее закрывается руками. ИИ окупается, ког

15👍8💯8

6 May 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,010 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Cold message в LinkedIn без захода в профиль лида — через Claude + Anysite.io MCP В прошлом посте мы обсудили, как с помощью промпта улучшить письма и как писать лучше в целом. Сейчас расскажу про более advanced подход к письмам 🎥 Тут ссылка на видео 👇 Ниже текстом В 2к26 "слепоту" пробивать сложно. AI без доступа к свежим данным пишут generic письма Покажу на свежем кейсе как с этим бороться. Цель: написать фа

🔥26👍12👏94

13 Apr 2026, 09:33 UTC≈2,500 views71 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему твои cold emails никто не читает (и при чем тут Хемингуэй) Тут ссылка на видео 👇 Ниже текстом Самая частая ошибка, которую я вижу у команд — overcomplicated письма. Интуитивно кажется: мы в B2B, тут серьёзные люди, надо писать серьёзным языком. На деле на решение "читать или удалить" уходит 2-3 секунды. Чем проще текст — тем быстрее мозг его переварит. Есть формула Flesch-Kincaid — она считает сложность т

👍3422🔥13❤‍🔥1😁1

13 Apr 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,650 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Залетел на SoldOut подкаст поболтать о продажах Кто искал что послушать в понедельник на тему b2b продаж, это для вас 😂🫶

10🔥5👍4🤝1

8 Apr 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,020 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

3 инструмента, которые экономят мне 30+ минут каждый день Записал видео, где показываю каждый из них в деле — ссылка на видео тут. 1. Сниппеты в Raycast Все повторяющиеся штуки — почта, ссылка на календарь, промпты для упрощения писем, спинтакс — вынесены в шорткаты. Набираю /cold → вставляется готовый промпт. Набираю /cal → ссылка на календарь. Правило: если отправляешь что-то больше 2 раз в неделю — это сниппет

20🔥18👍14

6 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,840 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сколько стоит поднять раунд самостоятельно? Я помогаю фаундерам в акселераторе Лимб Вижу, что большинство недооценивает стоимость процесса фандрейза. Посчитал конкретно. Email-аутрич на инвесторов: → Smartlead: ~$100/мес → 10-15 доменов: $130-200 единоразово на старте → ~30 ящиков через Zapmail: ~$100/мес → Обогащение почтами ~$100+/мес → Прогрев — 3-4 недели в том же Smartlead, и это месяц, когда ты просто ждёшь =

🔥1910👍7🤔1

18 Mar 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,910 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Впервые с меня так сильно трясли запись вебинара 😂 Ловите и делитесь мнением об эфире!

6💩3

18 Mar 2026, 11:54 UTC≈2,170 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rinatkhat

На прошлой неделе поговорили со Святом @salesvyat и Петей @impecableNotes про вайбкодинг в продажах: – как навайбкодить свою систему лид-скоринга без бэкграунда в разработке – почему Clay на скейле невыгоден и чем его заменить – сетап аутрич-кампании одним промптом Если пропустили – вот запись https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06Wbsn_FNyk

🔥2113🍌2💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @salesvyat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Свят | B2B Sales” (@salesvyat), 1,832 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salesvyat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.