Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SaltDivision 🪝

Channel

SaltDivision 🪝

@saltdivision

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,638subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658877578
TypeChannel
Username@saltdivision
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/saltdivision

Growth

2,6282,6382,6337 August 2026 — 2,628 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,629 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,630 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,629 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,638 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,630 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,637 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,638 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,627–2,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:392,638+1
6 Sept 2026, 02:392,637+7
1 Sept 2026, 21:532,630-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:542,632-6
24 Aug 2026, 01:462,638+6
20 Aug 2026, 01:032,632+3
17 Aug 2026, 09:472,629-2
13 Aug 2026, 10:272,631+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:172,630+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:162,629+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:012,628no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:592,628first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 43s
Average length
2m 26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

390 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18146.4%
👍12732.6%
389.74%
💯153.85%
🤣143.59%
😁61.54%
🆒51.28%
👌20.513%
👏10.256%
🙏10.256%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC595 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кастинг + моно + топвотеры = это правильно и хорошо ✅ Что?!…Так почти никто не ловит?! Это их проблемы:)

👍23🤣14🔥32💯1

6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC728 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Последний рывок! И на сегодня - всё….

🔥29

6 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC789 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эту удочку я сделал лет…15?!…назад. Как видите, она все еще таскает голавлей. И АБСОЛЮТНО адекватна. И в плане материалов, а там митсубиши, наносмолы и титан, пробка и хорошая ручка. Думаю, если их выпустить сегодня в том же дизайне, и в тех же материалах, то точно можно будет продавать вдвое дороже. Дизайн и типаж не потеряли актуальности ни на грамм. И материалы тоже. Знаете, что это значит? Ничего особо нового в

👍13💯12🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC821 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот что мы заметили. С приходом воды рыбу размазало по акватории, и она (вдруг!) стала резко пуглива. Не знаю причин, но вот буквально вчера она не боялась лодки и отлично реагировала на разные штуки, а вот уже сегодня не пускает и требует оооооооочень тщательного подбора приманки и ее подачи. Пока начало сезона выглядит очень жереховым:) Ловим на пластик, конечно же. Никакого железа. Стики, и skipping lures - они

👍193🆒1

5 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC887 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ребята говорят… думали, что в Волгограде - раю! - никогда не бывает дождей летом. Штож. Иногда в раю бывает влажно. Ангелы тоже плачут:)

👍1412😁6

5 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC968 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро! Постоянно сталкиваюсь с тем, что большинство рыболовов, приезжающих к нам рыбачить, не умеет вязать нормальные узлы. Использует один-два привычных, и все. Причем, эти «привычные» или не совсем компактные, или не совсем крепкие. Рыболовы самого разного уровня, от любителей, до «спортсменов». И самое удивительное, они не хотят учится их вязать:) Оправдывая это тем, что как-то же они ловят:) Конечно, мне

👍356👌2💯2

4 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC921 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍10🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC948 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Бесценные коммуникации с моими ребятами! Ну про приманки и жереха, конечно.

🔥17👍51👏1

4 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC963 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из баржи в рабочий полдень!

🔥35🆒32

3 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,120 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Утренний волгоградский вайб, еее!!!

🔥637🆒1

3 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,050 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @starsplavPhoto

Не прошло и половины лета (на самом деле, прошло), как Медведица посветлела в достаточноой мере, и пару сплавов в июле мы провели на ней. Погода радовала непредсказуемостью, гости радовали эмоциями, а голавль тоже молодец, ловился исправно. Поймали нескольких +/- полметров, да и в целом средний размер был неплох. Я ловил на свои поделки, у ребят хорошо работали новые кренки от River Vibe, Chubby Bug, а вот кроулеры

🔥29👍85

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @saltdivision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Андрей Питерцов
@AndreyPitertsov · 30,682
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 7 September 2026
Снасти Здрасьте!
@snasti_zdraste · 43,642
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Pro Anglers League
@PAL_ProAnglersLeague · 32,218
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SaltDivision 🪝” (@saltdivision), 2,638 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saltdivision.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.