Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Наука, идеи, открытия. Интеллектуальный канал.

Channel

Наука, идеи, открытия. Интеллектуальный канал.

@samintell

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,049subscribers

-291 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001845780323
TypeChannel
Username@samintell
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/samintell

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0492,3402,194.57 August 2026 — 2,340 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,340 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,336 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,331 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,326 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,328 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,316 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,326 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,147 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,161 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,105 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,098 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,083 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,049 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,005–2,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:362,049-34
15 Sept 2026, 06:592,083-15
11 Sept 2026, 06:562,098-7
6 Sept 2026, 12:192,105-56
2 Sept 2026, 10:042,161+14
30 Aug 2026, 11:222,147-179
27 Aug 2026, 04:172,326+10
24 Aug 2026, 07:242,316-12
20 Aug 2026, 10:062,328+2
17 Aug 2026, 16:352,326-5
14 Aug 2026, 14:372,331-5
11 Aug 2026, 06:042,336-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:132,340no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:032,340first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

463 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥24653.1%
👍10121.8%
6614.3%
👏143.02%
🥰143.02%
🤝112.38%
😁71.51%
20.432%
10.216%
❤‍🔥10.216%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC114 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как происходила эволюция кошек.

19👍19🥰1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC119 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤝2

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC102 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Учёные зарегистрировали и детально исследовали недавний взрыв звезды Вольфа - Райе. Когда массивная звезда заканчивает жизнь, её ядро коллапсирует, а наружу устремляется мощная ударная волна. В момент, когда эта волна прорывается сквозь поверхность звезды и окружающее её вещество - возникает очень короткая вспышка ультрафиолетового и мягкого рентгеновского излучения. Астрофизики называют это событие прорывом ударно

🔥36👍137👏21

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC85 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Космический телескоп Einstein Probe, предназначенный для поиска кратковременных рентгеновских вспышек, обнаружил источник мягкого рентгеновского излучения EP260321a в галактике SDSS J095942.88+002506.2, расположенной на расстоянии около 500 миллионов световых лет от Земли в направлении созвездия Секстанта. Уже через несколько часов после получения первых данных от космической обсерватории началась международная камп

🔥33👍155👏1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC89 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для проверки этого факта космическая рентгеновская обсерватория Chandra провела глубокие наблюдения через 15 и 39 дней после вспышки и не обнаружила никакого послесвечения в рентгеновском диапазоне. Кроме того, радиоинтерферометр Very Large Array в Нью-Мексико наблюдал объект на частотах от 6 до 22 ГГц и также не выявил признаков мощного релятивистского выброса в радиодиапазоне. Особенно ценными оказались оптические

🔥26👍114👏1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC102 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Однако самым интересным оказался не сам тип звезды, а особенности её поведения незадолго до взрыва. Обе научные группы независимо пришли к выводу, что помимо непрерывного мощного звёздного ветра, в последние годы жизни звезда пережила несколько эпизодов резко усилившейся потери массы. Во время этих событий она выбрасывала значительные количества вещества, сформировав вокруг себя сложную многослойную структуру. По м

🔥42👍1811👏3

Signed Алексей Кутерев

5 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Подробнее об этих исследованиях.

🤝2

Signed Алексей Кутерев

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC105 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Международная группа учёных под руководством специалистов из Калифорнийского университета в Беркли (США) и Университета Джонса Хопкинса (США) разработала новый метод поиска следов древних человеческих видов в ДНК современного человека. Он позволил обнаружить в ДНК современных людей, как уже известное наследие неандертальцев и денисовцев, так и следы ранее неизвестных вымерших человеческих видов, от которых не сохран

🔥15👍8🥰6😁63👏1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC96 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Главная трудность в работе учёных заключалась в том, что большинство существовавших сотни тысяч лет назад таких популяций исчезли, не оставив пригодной для исследования ДНК, а без сравнительного анализа их генома почти невозможно напрямую установить - какие участки наследственного материала были получены именно от них. Все существовавшие ранее методы требовали либо наличия древнего генома для сравнения, либо исследо

🔥13👍72👏1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC118 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кроме того, оказалось, что часть унаследованных от неандертальцев и денисовцев генов впоследствии подвергалась естественному отбору. Некоторые из них, вероятно, помогали нашим предкам лучше приспосабливаться к новым условиям внешней среды, тогда как другие постепенно исчезали из популяций. И новый метод позволил проследить судьбу таких участков генома значительно точнее, чем существовавшие ранее. Однако, авторы иссл

🔥19👍10🥰76❤‍🔥1👏1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

3 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Подробнее об этом исследовании.

1🤝1

Signed Алексей Кутерев

1 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC138 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кроме того, за пределами рассчитанного края галактики учёные обнаружили 8 очень протяжённых асимметричных звёздных структур, которые являются следами сравнительно недавних взаимодействий и слияний с другими галактиками. И две из этих структур совпадают с обнаруженным ранее рентгеновским излучением от возмущений горячего газа, заполняющего скопление Abell 2029, что указывает на связь между распределением звёзд и перем

🔥247👏2

Signed Алексей Кутерев

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @samintell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Какая страна осуществит первой в 21 веке пилотируемую посадку на Луну?

  1. США47%
  2. Китай49%
  3. Индия0%
  4. Россия0%
  5. Япония0%
  6. Новая Зеландия0%
  7. Никто никуда не летит4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,091
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,774
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наука, идеи, открытия. Интеллектуальный канал.” (@samintell), 2,049 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samintell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.