цитаты под твои фото 🫦

Channel
𝑺
@samstyless
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111,047subscribers
+10,280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002034191043 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @samstyless |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/samstyless |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 111,047 | +1,428 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:07 | 109,619 | +1,073 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 108,546 | +719 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 107,827 | +437 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 107,390 | +570 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 106,820 | +117 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 106,703 | +331 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 106,372 | +422 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 105,950 | +227 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 105,723 | +99 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 105,624 | +487 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 105,137 | +667 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 104,470 | +325 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 104,145 | -89 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 104,234 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 104,230 | +269 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 103,961 | +681 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 103,280 | +557 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 102,723 | +159 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 102,564 | first reading |
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.5%
- avg views ÷ 111,047 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15,000
- 157 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 157
- of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 157 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 171 (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,350,947 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 01:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1,668
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 73
- of 171 we hold a reading for · 43%
- Most on one post
- 173
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samstyless. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 171 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
И если когда-нибудь в далёком будущем мы всё-таки встретимся, я улыбнусь тебе, вспомню, как мы проводили своё единственное лето, учась друг у друга зрелости и любви.
Photo, posted without a caption
как будто все песни о любви написаны про тебя.
фото на аву(без лица)🫦
🌸🌸 🌸🌸Канал для VIP girls 🌸🌸
Настоящая ценность становится ясна лишь после потери.
Треки из Spotify 🤩
Треки Jah Khalib,Macan,Есенин🎵
0:30
0:07
- в конце концов ты встретишь человека, который тоже устал от игр. и его верность встретится с твоей.
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @samstyless. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Catvpn1bot · 33,7573 postsɢᴀʟʟᴀᴛᴏོ
@gallaatoo · 6,8793 postshoney sins
@honeysinss · 2,0353 postsnaymax
@naymax111 · 11,5343 postsser im
@negovoritemne · 1,5443 postsAHA VPN
@ahavpnbot · 36,9212 postsloveli
@lovveelii · 6,7672 postsnrll
@nrll_ch · 1,4572 postsслюбовyou uma
@slbvuma · 14,7362 postsВечно XVII
@Vechn0_XVII · 17,3692 postsчувство верности
@wthlvan · 66,9902 postsMr
@axmuurr · 1,0461 postMMVII
@MMVII_1 · 17,9781 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑺” (@samstyless), 111,047 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samstyless.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.