Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sanchez

Channel

Sanchez

@sanchez_works

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,878subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834378176
TypeChannel
Username@sanchez_works
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sanchez_works

Growth

10,72310,87810,800.56 August 2026 — 10,846 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,846 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,826 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,814 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,811 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,813 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,806 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,813 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,811 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,801 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,787 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,783 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,781 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,770 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,766 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,750 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,749 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,747 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,738 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,739 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,750 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,743 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,736 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,735 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,733 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,731 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,723 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,878 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,700–10,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 05:4010,878+155
7 Sept 2026, 01:1610,723-8
4 Sept 2026, 06:3910,731-2
2 Sept 2026, 21:2210,733-2
1 Sept 2026, 20:2610,735-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:1410,736-7
31 Aug 2026, 01:3510,743-7
30 Aug 2026, 01:4210,750+11
29 Aug 2026, 02:0410,739+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:1310,738-9
27 Aug 2026, 00:1410,747-2
25 Aug 2026, 21:4310,749-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:3810,750-16
23 Aug 2026, 12:5810,766-4
22 Aug 2026, 01:1610,770-11
20 Aug 2026, 21:1310,781-2
19 Aug 2026, 18:3210,783-4
18 Aug 2026, 16:3310,787-14
17 Aug 2026, 16:0610,801-4
16 Aug 2026, 06:2810,805first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 10,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,420
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held24 (21 May 20261 September 2026)
Views total13,270
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

983 reactions across 24 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁57158.1%
🔥22222.6%
🤩989.97%
😱626.31%
👀303.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 983 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 24 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanchez_works. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,900 views33 reactions12 Starsread 1 September 2026

какой же веселый рынок, забриджил бабки на кронос для арбитража купил на часть стейбла битка, сеть остановили и сделали откат, щас запустили, а тугриков нету -60к сижу в полном ахуе, ну как нахуй в ДЕЦЕНТРАЛИЗАЦИИ ТАК ДЕЛАЮТ нет чтоб заблокать хакера команда гондонов, решила просто перенести этот убыток на тех у кто бриджил. Есть конечно шанс что сдеают какой-то конверт для старых, надеюсь что он отиграет.

😱26👀7

26 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC≈4,900 views38 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Говорят там Phemex 300 еще и не последний человек на бирже. Я выведу до копейки все оттуда.

😁33👀5

24 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈5,470 views65 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Прикольно, Теперь биржи за арбитраж списывают наши деньги. Жаль вот XPL и LA нам не рефнули, ну хорошо что проектам которые сами себя взламывают отдадут наши деньги, справедливость.

😁65

9 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC≈7,890 views76 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ахахах. Почему $TUT торгуют больше чем биткоин, такого я еще не видел. Как же рынок наполнен нами лудиками.

😁75🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈5,290 views24 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @bvksbdr5Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁23🤩1

9 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈5,170 views33 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Вот че вам писать не знаю, но дам совет если вы уже заходите в такие шорты как тут. Сегодня многих ликвиднуло из-за того что заходили или рано в шорт или в спредик, я при таких ситуациях беру всегда шорта маркетом уже на красных палках, это намного безопаснее, а то никогда не знаешь насколько запампят. + деньги есть, + параноя заходить в спреды есть.

😁23👀5🔥5

11 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC≈7,060 views28 reactionsread 1 September 2026

фингерит забайтил зарегаться в новом перп дексе от робингуда ARCUS - ТЫК в целом то, о чем я говорил в посте, новая сеть, новая платформа сюда точно уделю много внимания, должны быть дыры не доработки.

😁24👀4

11 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC≈6,490 views53 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Здравствуйте друзья, сложно что-то писать когда у всех так много ликвидности, щас колы буд-то можно кидать только в какие-то маленькие чаты, но пока руки не доходят сделать место для смартиков. Че вам хотел сказать, я вот сидел думал как словить свой лч, и понял что такие ситуации в 95% случаев новые или в чем-то новом. Как было с нефтью, новыми биржами, выходами акций, добавление новых продуктов типо астера или бин

😁33🔥16🤩4

1 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC≈6,360 views67 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Лень меня убьет, лежали бабки на кракене думаю занесу на пох в ипо, потыкался потыкался не нашел кнопку и забил хуй, а там 33%😁

😁65👀2

28 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC≈8,230 views45 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

кто там спрашивает чем занимаюсь сейчас лето, рыночек на упадке и ленивом ворке. Так что сейчас больше чилю, со спейсх вышел, жду биточек на откуп и фармлю фандосики и 2-3% спреда. их кстати очень не дооценивал свою планочку профита на них поддерживаю, не ленитесь в такие штуки заходить там с SIREN и SKYAI целое состояние упало. надеюсь скоро мета вернеться и буду опять всем рассказывать что фомо и миллионы были п

🔥36😁6👀2🤩1

28 Jun 2026, 14:10 UTC≈5,910 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Потегайте, пожалуйста, все в лс @NPCDOL до 1-2 числа uid и биржу на рефбек комсы ,первого числа всем закину.

🔥3

12 Jun 2026, 16:47 UTC≈7,980 views64 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Не верующие в мекс проспамлены

😁56🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @sanchez_works. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sanchez” (@sanchez_works), 10,878 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanchez_works.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.