Здесь выходят проды на ролики, эксклюзив, блуперсы! А ещё показываю всё о закадровой жизни блогерства 🧡
Сотрудничество:
[email protected]
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67505a0bd793bc0b0b95649d®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 58 days, net -1,178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,742–32,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 09:21
30,919
-166
25 Sept 2026, 19:59
31,085
-101
19 Sept 2026, 07:16
31,186
-62
16 Sept 2026, 22:17
31,248
-44
15 Sept 2026, 02:57
31,292
-35
13 Sept 2026, 12:01
31,327
-35
11 Sept 2026, 19:19
31,362
-34
9 Sept 2026, 07:17
31,396
-59
5 Sept 2026, 21:17
31,455
-33
3 Sept 2026, 17:41
31,488
-21
2 Sept 2026, 10:34
31,509
-28
1 Sept 2026, 10:09
31,537
-42
31 Aug 2026, 10:16
31,579
-29
30 Aug 2026, 07:14
31,608
-10
29 Aug 2026, 05:34
31,618
-11
28 Aug 2026, 04:24
31,629
-16
27 Aug 2026, 06:37
31,645
-29
26 Aug 2026, 04:33
31,674
-6
25 Aug 2026, 01:46
31,680
-35
23 Aug 2026, 14:49
31,715
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.62%
avg views ÷ 30,919 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
47 (15 July 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
44,740
Reactions total
1,364
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Oct 2026, 11:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,380
Videos
≈294
Links
≈297
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,295 reactions across 47 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,665
62.0%
🔥
415
9.66%
💋
298
6.94%
😱
272
6.33%
❤🔥
168
3.91%
🥰
126
2.93%
😭
46
1.07%
🕊
45
1.05%
💘
36
0.838%
🤣
26
0.605%
⚡
15
0.349%
🎄
15
0.349%
😨
15
0.349%
👍
13
0.303%
😁
13
0.303%
🍓
10
0.233%
😍
10
0.233%
😢
10
0.233%
🎅
8
0.186%
🤡
8
0.186%
22 further kinds
81
1.89%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 47 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sandy_cheekks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«А она оказывается готовить умеет?»
Да, умею 😇
А учитывая то, что мне молочку можно только 1 раз в день (спасибо железу), я стараюсь из нее выжать максимум.
Кстати доставками я питаюсь сууупер редко, чаще готовлю, но что-то быстрое + полезное + простое
Не хочу посадить здоровье всякой фигней из доставок
Ну нисшевоооо😍
+1 мечта в копилку
И что-то мне подсказывает, что попасть туда реальнее, чем в космос
Осталось понять где это и как туда добраться
Одна проблема: это слишком нисшевый трип и найти бади для видоса будет трудновато
Знаете, почему я тут такая недовольная?
Я закупилась витаминами, который прописал врач. А еще он сказал, что для усвоения железа нельзя есть за 2 часа ДО и ПОСЛЕ большое количество продуктов😭.
И ладно, если бы вредных..
НЕТ
❌Нельзя: чай, кофе, яйца, цельнозеоновые продукты, какао, молочку. И все что это содержит
Самое обидное, что из этих продуктов состоит большая часть моего рационаааа😭😭😭
Витаминки пить 3 месяц
Аэрофобы, пролистывайте этот пост😬
Потому что даже мне становится не по себе от этих кадров с посадкой самолетов
Я вроде бы еще не говорила тут, но после Кейптауна очень захотела побывать на острове Мадейра (Португалия) 🇵🇹
Остров невероятный и по вайбу похож на Кейптаун и Бали одновременно
Но этот аэропорт…☠️
Даже для меня, как не аэрофоба, это сильно
Хочу обозначить важное правило по поводу общения в чате 🧡
В последнее время некоторые конфликты переходят в оскорбления и травлю, и я не хочу, чтобы здесь была такая атмосфера.
Спорить и не соглашаться - нормально.
Оскорблять, унижать и переходить на личности - нет
Поэтому хочу обозначить новое правило:
❗️Теперь за первое оскорбление будет мут, за повторные - длительный мут, а на третий раз - бан из чата. Без во…
Повелась на рекомендации Тик Тока и решила пойти на Садовод 🛍️
Ни разу там ничего не брала. Но в Тик Токе говорили, что там много прикольных вещей по низким ценам
Итог: мне ВОООБЩЕ НЕ ПОНРАВИЛОСЬ
❌Продавцы с пассивной агрессией, если ты ничего не купил
❌Примерить много чего нельзя
❌Качество и ассортимент не очень (на мой вкус)
❌Повсюду воняет айкосами и сигами 🥵
Больше сюда ни ногой. Лучше за оверпрайс покупать, …
Ну блокбастер, товарищи 😬
Вообще цель ролика - это не выложить ролик. Я просто думала, что если мое внимание будет на съемке, а не на процессе сдачи крови, то психологически будет легче и я как-то отвлекусь
Спойлер: нет
Иду сдавать кровь на железооо😭😭
Страшноо.
Еще этот крик мальчика на фонее😬
Была б моя воля, также бы кричала
Я очень боюсь всех этих иголок, мне прям не по себе становится даже от запаха лабараторий.
Сдаю естественно в платной клинике, потому что не хочу встретиться врачебным абьюзом
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @sandy_cheekks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sandy_cheekks named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cavabanga300 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сэнди Чикс” (@sandy_cheekks), 30,919 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sandy_cheekks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.