Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 62 days, net +3,874. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,111–24,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 20:39
23,566
+362
4 Oct 2026, 07:40
23,204
+677
25 Sept 2026, 12:41
22,527
+354
19 Sept 2026, 00:58
22,173
+139
16 Sept 2026, 18:21
22,034
+278
14 Sept 2026, 20:18
21,756
+98
13 Sept 2026, 07:56
21,658
+116
11 Sept 2026, 09:19
21,542
+147
8 Sept 2026, 14:36
21,395
+193
5 Sept 2026, 09:15
21,202
+109
3 Sept 2026, 13:40
21,093
+80
2 Sept 2026, 07:45
21,013
+130
1 Sept 2026, 08:44
20,883
+87
31 Aug 2026, 07:53
20,796
+141
30 Aug 2026, 05:46
20,655
+17
29 Aug 2026, 07:33
20,638
+30
28 Aug 2026, 08:34
20,608
+70
27 Aug 2026, 08:53
20,538
+104
26 Aug 2026, 05:16
20,434
+40
25 Aug 2026, 02:04
20,394
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 23,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,490
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held
100 (3 August 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total
208,486
Reactions total
4,553
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 08:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
767
Videos
14
Links
427
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,922 reactions across 100 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,422
44.6%
🔥
3,925
39.6%
👍
628
6.33%
🏆
451
4.55%
👏
265
2.67%
🤯
90
0.907%
💯
72
0.726%
🥰
69
0.695%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,922 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 100 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanixenfree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 100 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 10 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🏆 Results of the SEASON 2 Trading Tournament from 😏 Spiceprop!
Every day, the leaderboard changed with new leaders. Everyone had different tactics - trading on full margin or conservatively. The final results are as follows:
🥇 1st place (Mirakbarov Mirolim) — €100,000 Challenge
🥈 2nd place (Джулаев Артем) — €50,000 Challenge
🥉 3rd place (Osuyos Amelito Jr) — €25,000 Challenge
🥉 4th place (Phang Gibson) — €25,000 Ch…
🗣What Type of Reaction to Expect from Fibonacci Levels?
#strategy
The Fibonacci retracement grid is a core tool, yet many traders make the mistake of expecting an identical reaction every single time price approaches a level like 61.8%. Price delivery varies based on context and timeframe alignment.
Here are the 3 primary reaction models at a Fibonacci level and how to manage your execution for each:
1️⃣ Instant …
🔥🎁 Promo from Spiceprop
🔥 10% OFF. THEN 100% OFF.
The math gets better the second time with code DOUBLE10
Your first eligible account:
✔️ 10% OFF
Your second identical account:
✔️ 100% OFF
Same program. Same account size.
And you get the second one immediately — no need to pass the first account.
🏷 Promo Code: DOUBLE10
❌ Not included:
Spice 3-Step €15K
Spice Instant Pro €1K
Spice Instant €1K
Spice 2-Step €10K
S…
Good Morning, Team 🤝
Today is FRIDAY, which means I should publish a FREE Educational post today 📕
It will be an educational post on Fibonacci levels.
By the way, I haven't done that in a while..
Support with reactions if you're genuinely interested in my #strategy 🔥🔥🔥
🌟V.S community | 🌐 Sanixen VIP|😏 Spiceprop
🥇 5M GOLD → 🌟 V.S. COMMUNITY
🤩 A major update to my Free channel!
It is no longer just a Gold channel — together with another trader, we have combined our approaches and created V.S. Community — an open trading community for those who want more than just individual signals.
What is now inside:
1️⃣ Trading Signals — real trades in signal format: Entry, SL, TP, limit orders, and real-time position management.
2️⃣ Go…
🗣Results of Day 3 of the trading tournament from 😏 Spiceprop!
Halfway through, and traders are already showing strong results. Everything can change in one day - stick to your strategy until the end. You still have 2 full days! 🏆
You can see the limited promo for yourself
🌐 Sanixen VIP|😏 Spiceprop
🥇#XAU +5R +5R +4R 😎😎😎
5R one way, 5R back, and another 4R along the way 😍
Today in the VIP Community, we caught an excellent buy. I looked for shorts in this zone several times, but after the sweep and the re-test of the trendline, everything became crystal clear - this was an ironclad long. Above, there are zones where I'm anticipating shorts.
🗣Next, 2 trades were executed in the new channel/community that I will …
🗣Results of Day 1 of the trading tournament from 😏 Spiceprop!
Here is the current Top 10 participants. Everything can change by tomorrow, and there are still 4 days of active trading ahead!
Single limit (Drawdown): The maximum allowed drawdown is 8% of the initial deposit - elimination occurs when Equity drops to $92,000 or below.
Full freedom:
• No daily drawdown limits.
• No lot size limits, trade count limits, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @sanixenfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sanixenfree edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sanixen™” (@sanixenfree), 23,566 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanixenfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.