Channel
@sarhneM37
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
213subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003045373749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sarhneM37 |
| Description | رابط القناة: https://t.me/sarhneM37 رابط صراحة: |
| Created | 23 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sarhneM37 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 213 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 213 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 23 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
التقديرات بشكل عام بتتحسب الامتياز 100% : 85% جيد جدا 85 % : 75% جيد 75% : 65% الامتياز 65% : 60% وفي حالة ان فيه كسور بيتم تقريب الدرجات غالبا فا إن شاء الله خير وفي حالة بلوك الIPC بعد التقريب الامتياز تجيب 45/53 جيد جدا تجيب 40/53 جيد تجيب 34/53 مقبول تجيب 32/53
رسالة بشكل عام لتوضيح درجات الرافة و النجاح في كل بلوك اول شرط تكون جايب 60% من درجات البلوك و تاني شرط انك تجيب لايحة الفاينال اللي هي 40% من درجات الفاينال طاب امتي آخد درجات الرافة انك لازم تكون معدي لائحة الفانيال ولكن فاضلك علي النجاح كام درجة في الحالة دي هتتحسبلك 3% من درجات البلوك زيادة بحيث تضمنلك النجاح اما لا قدر الله في حالة انك مجبتش اللائحة مش هتاخد درجات رافة و هتاخده سمر
شروط النجاح في اي بلوك عامة هي ان تعدي لايحة الفاينال و توتال 60% من درجات البلوك لازم الاتنين
31.8 يعني حوالي 32 بشرط انك تعدي لايحة الفاينال
تبديل الامثلة تقريبا هينقصوا عليهم و إن كان ربنا قادر علي كل شئ و الحروف الغلط ترجع للمصحح انه يعديها ولا لا بس لو حرف مثلا او حجات بسيطة بتعدي غالبا
خير إن شاء الله و عامة اللائحة 13 درجة في البلوك ده فالدرجة هتتحسب علي انها 23 في الفاينال و 8 في الميد و كتوتال ممكن بفرض احتساب ال 5 درجات بتاعت البروتفوليو 36 من 53 إن شاء الله
و خيرا جزاكم فعلا الترم ده اخد مننا مجهود كبير خاصة انه فيه ملفات و افكار كتير اتعملت محدش كان عملها بفضل الله و إن شاء الله نكون في تقدم دايما و في حسن ظنكم و نسال الله القبول❤️
مش ناسيينكم طبعا و كذلك زمايلنا اللي كان موقوف قيدهم الترم الاول 🫡❤️
❤🔥1
هنتاكد حاضر من هي كام درجة هو كان صعب لانه سال في تفاصيل ما بين السطور او حتي بين قوسين كمان و غير النقاط اللي بيسال فيها عن السنين السابقة فا الامتحان علي الكل كان صعب و الله المستعان
❤️❤️
❤4
هي فعلا الاسئلة السنة دي خاصة الاسئلة بقت اصعب عن السنوات اللي فاتت و بقت تسال في تفاصيل المناهج وكذلك انهم بيكونوا عايزين يصفوا في سنة اولي امتحانات الدور التاني غالبا بتكون اسئلتها كويسة بس اللي بياثر معاهم الوقت قبل الامتحان فا مهم تكون محضرله عشان زنقة السمر خاصة انه السنة دي هيكون مدته قليلة
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sarhneM37. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صراحة - معوان 37” (@sarhneM37), 213 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarhneM37.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.