Перекрытие по вселенной Чужого Старую татушку в комменты приложу Первый сеанс в концу Кстати. Весь рукав будет по Прометею. Будет просто взрыв!
🔥13🥰4

Channel
@sashechqa540
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,496subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001290443874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sashechqa540 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sashechqa540 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 1,496 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:42 | 1,500 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 1,501 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 1,503 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:26 | 1,495 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 1,496 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,497 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 1,496 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 1,491 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,488 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 1,487 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 1,493 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 1,492 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 1,493 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 1,493 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
161 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 89 | 55.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 18.6% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 6.83% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 4.97% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.35% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.73% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.621% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.621% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Перекрытие по вселенной Чужого Старую татушку в комменты приложу Первый сеанс в концу Кстати. Весь рукав будет по Прометею. Будет просто взрыв!
🔥13🥰4
Уникальность этой тутатроыки знаете какая? 7 и сколько то сеансов за месяц! Вот так вот А вы дальше ходите раз в пол года Человек вот видит цель и препятствий нет Через месяц будет турбо красавец
🔥15❤🔥6
Опять вписался в какую-то цветную заварушку Красил сегодня на проводе, не оч понравилось конечно. Но Вайб присутствует. Мне бы с такими пастельными видяниями Ренессанс поколоть Желающих бы на ренессанс цветной найти - былобыславно!
❤🔥10❤3🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9👍2❤🔥1🤝1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9💯2❤🔥1
Сначала читайте, потом смотрите на картинки! Щас снова будет говнопост. Вам будет что почитать. Короче Вот Из последнего рилсе моего мы уже поняли, что некоторые люди не видят разницы между хорошей тату и говеной тату. Сиська - сиська, цветок - цветок. Так же есть еще одна вещь, которая тревожит людей, это как не попасть к хуевому мастеру, если у него ну..ну норм портфолио. Смотрите Если вы когда-нибудь сидели на пин…
😁5🥴4❤🔥3❤1😱1
Алоха! А мы тут потихоньку рукав приканчиваем Еще внутри жабича доделаем и вообще шик бокс 🥊
🔥15❤1❤🔥1
Совсем забыл залить сюда, а то в ВК и инст уже поделился. Это Асклепий - Бог медицины. Запрос на профессиональный рукав в греческой тематике Нравится 💅💉
🔥20👍4❤🔥1
Таргетинг?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Высвечивается мне иногда вот такое чудо. Не только от этого чувака, а в целом. Татуеры, пользуетесь услугами таргет-менов?
Факт дня: ЛЮДИ РАЗНИЦЫ НЕ ВИДЯТ. Я очень сильно рекомендую вам почитать комментарии под рилсом выше. Там люди буквально пишут, что эти работы (приложил) им реально нравятся, либо они неплохие, либо что в них ничего такого, что они кому-то нравятся Щас не будем спорить о вкусах, щас просто пост констатации факта. Надеюсь, я вам доказал это наглядным опытом)
❤🔥7😁6❤3
Таких историй на самом деле очень много. Я очень часто слышал от мастеров такой тейк, что я не буду бить, если вижу что это плохая идея. Но! Прямо тебе показывает полную хуйню, и просит её исполнить один в один. И ты к этому относишься, либо как к коммерции и просто делаешь деньги. Либо уже отказываешь в угоду души своей творческой 😹 Было было. Иногда просто делаешь, как делаешь, просто исполняешь работу. Клиент уше…
💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @sashechqa540. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Таргетинг?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SASHECHQA 540” (@sashechqa540), 1,496 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sashechqa540.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.